• Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because safety protocols would inherently be a software issue and you might need to turn them off to calibrate it from time to time. Also, what might be safe for one species could be dangerous to another.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably for physics experiments. The holodeck isn’t just used for entertainment. They might use it to simulate new engines or technologies they are working on. If the forcefields can interact to work just like a prototype engine would, it becomes possible to prototype new tech in the holodeck then fabricating the real thing.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was blown when I found out that liquid can be drank in the holodeck, and went down a rabbit hole where I found out that modern holodecks have replicators built in, and mix/match when to create real water, and when just to simulate a virtual (but hard) liquid.

      Whenever you see a waterfall in the holodeck, it’s likely just rendered scenery until you interact with it, in which case they switch to using a replicator to give the real effect.

      TL;DR – Video game mipmapping hasn’t changed essentially

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also getting to them. Holodecks appear larger than they are because as you move around the projections move with you.

        And they can even isolate individuals inside the holodeck in smaller “rooms” that move the projections relative to that person so people can be spread around in the virtual space while remaining in the room.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because they trust their crew to make wise use of it and have advanced, free medical treatment available for the risks involved?

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    In the TNG episode Descent, Data tries to run a physically dangerous experiment and turn off the safety protocols, but this time the computer requires 2 officers to authorize it. I guess they finally got smart after a few years?

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe it was just that dangerous to let data fuck around with the holodeck.

      Wait, disregard I’m thinking of Geordi and Barclay

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The answer is religious purposes, notably Klingon and presumably Jewish ceremonies with one being explained in the show and the other is me just assuming they probably don’t have all the religious centers onboard but could generate any of them in the holodeck.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        What Jewish holidays are we celebrating that require the holodeck be turned off??? Are we bringing Haman back for some reason?

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          A moyle which is traditionally done in Temple with family but many religions have done form of bloodletting or ritual combat/painful physical contact. Like say for instance they got a dude from that tribe in Africa that use those trippy ant filled reed gloves, the pain has to be real and the danger has to be real or they couldn’t be considered a man. For any of these to work safeties would have to be off to accomplish them.

    • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is no doubt one of the best answers. But also I think the episode where Data is studying humor kind of answered it as well. If there’s no consequence to failure, it’s not actually thrilling, it’s just VR. If you can’t feel the pain of the cut, are you going to learn to sword fight as well?

      Training martial arts would actually be amazing in a holodeck. Imagine being able to fight Tyson, but at 10% strength so you can better understand his moves, then ramp up his strength slowly to understand how you can counter stronger opponents? Or Ali at 25% speed so you can work your way up to full speed reaction timing.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Based on a quick search, the estimates I found had a pretty wide spread but most people seem to put him as punching 5-10 times harder than an average man. At 10% you still have to contend with his technique, but the force would be comparable to an amateur boxer.

          Granted, without training an amateur boxer could still probably wreck your shit, but they probably wouldn’t put you in the hospital.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        To dredge up the old argument.

        Ali fought a lot of powerful hitters. George Foreman was a monster, Joe Frazier was a monster, Sonny Liston was a monster. He beat them all.

        Name one really great boxer Tyson defeated.

      • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        From a technical standpoint I feel like it would be easier to implement when you need hardlight interactions for things like chairs and consoles to be tangible in the holodeck. Seems easier to just implement a safety protocol that affects anything moving at a harmful velocity than any other way. Anyway, programming it like that would allow for the safeties to be easily disabled.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a military vessel. The bigger question to me is why don’t they turn off all the safety protocols around the transporters more often?

    I think at least half of their problems could be solved if they used transporters to intentionally kill people or to disable other vessels. “Their shields are down? Beam their life support system and parts of the ship’s hull into space.”

    • 0x4f1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 days ago

      No it is not a military vessel. It is an exploration vessel. That is the core mission. Not sure how anyone who has actually watched StarTrek miss this key point.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        Whether or not Starfleet is a military force is a pretty debated topic, you really can’t brush it off like it’s a closed case.

        They have command rank and structure similar to a military. They have ships. The ships have weapons - powerful ones. Sometimes they use the weapons.

        We can argue “well they don’t want to use them,” but a lot of earth militaries don’t really want to be in combat either, until they have to be.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          It depends what Star Trek you are watching as well.

          Defiant is very definitely a military vessel. Next Gen Enterprise has like a thousand people on it or something so it’s less clear.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Good point. Even if it’s science and exploration, wtf do they need a thousand people for? Unless they are trying to find some place to colonize, but it’s pretty clear from watching the show they are not. A lot of those people don’t wear uniforms, so they are not part of this rank hierarchy. What are all those people doing there?

        • BillyClark@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think that people who say that Starfleet is not a military organization must just have a different definition of “military” than I do.

          In addition to all of the things you mentioned, when Earth is attacked, Starfleet frequently orders ships to return and fight.

          So, they’re either a police or a military, and the fact that they may face court martial for disobeying orders to fight really decides it in the direction of military for me.

          That’s by my own definition of military. I was looking at the Star Trek wiki and it seems that Roddenberry was very much against Starfleet being the military. He must just have a different criteria.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I can totally see them as not a military. They are to science and diplomacy what the East India Companies were to capitalism. Sure they have a military structure and a militia role, but if anything they’re more like general purpose UN vessels. They need to be capable of military force because they’re the government’s ships, and because even beyond dealing with aggressive governments, they’re also responsible for peacekeeping missions and they’re off in unexplored places.

          • phx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think Enterprise covered it fairly well. They definitely started it more towards the science/exploratory side but quickly ran into the “1000001 ways to die horribly in space” and started jerry-rigging stuff like phasers and photon torpedoes from what was formerly mining equipment etc. Even then they did still have a command structure similar to military, which just makes sense from a practical “who’s in charge of what” perspective. They also do have a mix of civilian and more military-style ranks.

            Starfleet may have an overall scientific mission/objective, but it definitely developed along the the structure of a military protectorate or coalition, though again that was likely due to a certain amount of necessity. I’m pretty sure that exploratory or trading vessels in historic times tended towards that in some regard.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, that’s why it was a response to the holodeck question, which has the same answer, only the holodeck is far less immediately powerful.

        • hansolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          The holodeck is also just a plot device. Instead of the TOS penchant for time travel and “oh no, we ended up on Earth in 18XX/19XX” plots, they could hit the Holodeck as the release valve. Lower stakes, lower contrivance barrier to get the crew into the situation.

          You want real life? The safety protocols keep people from breaking the damn thing. It wouldn’t render half the dangerous stuff, like bullets flying too fast to bother rendering. The emitters wouldn’t be able to render objects inside a body, so bullets would only penetrate a few cm at best if they did render. Knives and sharp objects might not render sharp enough to cause real harm, and might not render into the would, either, so also low penetrative range. Chemical reactions are visual simulations, so acid doesn’t really burn. Poison isn’t real poison because it’s a hologram that feels real, not real chemicals. Blunt force trauma, crushing force, and maybe heat, might be the only guaranteed ways to do violence in the Holodeck with the protocols turned off.

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            I like the part about how the holodeck power was separate so they could fuckoff there when they were about to die instead of hooking that power supply up and getting life support back.

              • [object Object]@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I mean, the holodeck probably theoretically requires at least most of the power available on the whole Earth right now. Wouldn’t want it to touch the ship’s other systems.

                • hansolo@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s basically just tractor beam forcefields, maybe not the whole Earth.

                  And I can see how an IRL explanation is that of someone is doing something crazy and flipping around, if everything disappears, they might get hurt falling even a meter at an awkward angle.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s another question: In a world where you can remotely read the quantum state of every atom of someone’s body from (at minimum) thousands of miles away (as this is what would be required for beaming from the surface of a planet into orbit, a fairly ordinary task by Trek standards), how could informational security exist? A transporter sensor array ought to be able to read the screen on any computer on any ship without specific shielding, as that would be a comparatively macroscopic task, compared to transporting a living being.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its always been dumb that transporting opposing crews into space or directly into brig cells isn’t the main strategy for any culture with transporter tech.

      Oh, their shields are down. Better poke tiny holes in their hull for an hour and hope they don’t kill us first.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        In real life it would absolutely be this. There could be no weapon more powerful than a transporter.

        But it would make for a very dull show and that is the reason they don’t (usually) do it.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’d also see massive investments in transporter blocking, including passive blocking built into the hull.

          Which is completely possible based on half a dozen episodes.

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          For sure. Its just a thing we have to accept to keep the writers from having to spend all day working through this shit to the point where its just boring reality.

          Like how “the ability to destroy a WHOLE planet” is treated as some kind of significant technological advantage in so many universes that also treat propelling a hundred thousands tons of spaceship well beyond the speed of light as a trivial every day thing. A star destroyer or galaxy class ship traveling at a multiple of C is a thousand times more devastating than any super-weapon that has ever threatened to upset the balance of power in a science fiction story.

          • DarkwingDuck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            The ship isn’t moving at C. Its warp drive is bending space around it, the ship is actually at rest. Therefore, we aren’t accelerating the ship’s mass to ridiculous speeds at all.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Eh, it’s a decent four episode arc. The protagonists try it, it works, they use it once very effectively, they try to use it again and the antagonists have pattern scramblers all over their ships. And then the antagonist uses it in a different, more devastating way, so now transport blocking becomes decoupled from shields in the plot.

            I’d rather stick with poking holes

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Computer, teleport me down to earth’s surface, then drive the ship at warp 9 right through the center of Romulus.

            Computer: I’m gonna have to push back on your plan a bit.

        • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          They would just have to find a reason to disable it via plot devices before every battle.

          Kinda like in action movies where the heroes come out shooting guns at each other but immediately get them batted away so that they can begin hand to hand fighting.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Isn’t that what the borg did?

      They just kinda pulled off sections to analyze/wreck the ship like a tiny bug.

    • MoffKalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think the cannon response is that you’d have to lower your own shields to do it, which is risky. But yeah if both were down, then go to town.

    • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Military? What military?

      It’s an exploration fleet.

      However, much like myself, they recognize that the place they’re in isn’t a peaceful utopia where everyone gets along, and nobody wants to push others around just for being there. So of course they’re armed and armored exploration vessels.

      The ranks and protocol just make for standardized things across the fleet so people don’t need 500 different ways of doing things, and can integrate with each other more easily. Ranks make chain of command clear in stressful situations.

      In very few instances is starfleet’s intent to end the life of anyone else. Why punch a hole through shields and beam a quantum torpedo into the enemy ship’s engineering section when you want them to stop fighting and talk things out? Hard to do when you’re dead.

      Starfleet has similar patterns to militaries, but as a peaceful exploration focused group tries to use peaceful measures at every turn, even when their opponent has refused to listen every time.

      Hell, even the romulans got help when they needed it despite centuries of constant threats, fleet action, intrusions into territory, subterfuge and sabotage, and outright hostility. The klingons are allies despite once being at war, and older generations still being distrusting of the federation.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The ranks and protocol just make for standardized things across the fleet so people don’t need 500 different ways of doing things, and can integrate with each other more easily. Ranks make chain of command clear in stressful situations.

        It’s also just how real life ships have worked for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Ships are inherently dangerous, you can’t discuss everything to death or have two parts of the crew follow mutually exclusive plans when you’re supposed to respond to an emergency.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Beaming out their life support system seems pretty slow. Why not just beam a bunch of cinder blocks into their body cavities.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Then you’d have to worry about sourcing cinder blocks. How about, instead of cinder blocks, you beam another crew person in, or just their head? That way, you get two at once.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The damn transporters are cloning and immortality machines.

      The transporters and replicators solve virtually every problem they have.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or, just beam them over but mimic that time they turned Picard into a child. Then train the kid to be nicer and achieve diplomacy.

      If that does not work, put them in the pattern buffer but put it on a drive that is prone to bit rot so they slowly start losing small pieces of their data/themselves until they surrender from the pain.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well, obviously it is based on Linux. What, you don’t want root access to your holodeck?

    At least you don’t need a Meta account to access the holodeck!

    Oh! Edit! That’s the Ferengi model!

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Disable the safety protocols”

      “That functionality is not permitted”

      “Sudo disable the safety protocols”

      “Okie dokie”

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Disable the safety protocols”

        “That functionality is not permitted”

        POP! hisssss “Computer! Observe verification can consumption”

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I imagine a bit of a gap moe in how the cold heartless machine voice changes to a heavily accented voice for the Okie Dokie.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fun fact: In universe the OS is called LCARS or Library Computer Access and Retrieval System. The name and how they use the computers are largely due to the main lore building happening in a time before PCs were ubiquitous and mainframes were still the norm.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. The ship computers are basically terminals that are sub-space connected to the mainframe, called Memory Alpha, in San Francisco, where Starfleet is headquartered.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        They were still outputing paper tape in the TOS era. Almost like they had to relearn computing from first principles at some point.