So you get in the bathtub with the bike pump and have the hose connected to a nozzle going out. You might need something stronger that shrinkwrap depending on what you get, but your bathtub is invariably able to handle 1 atmosphere of pressure.
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 1403
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 1403
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Or, hear me out: a bathtub, some shrinkwrap, a bicycle pump and so e good old fashioned grit and determination.
I'm one of those people who knows we should standardize, bit also finds Fahrenheit just very convenient.
Like, when people say it's 50 out, I immediately know that it's going to feel about halfway between what I know 0 and 100 feel like. No one can even put up the pretext of doing that with Celsius, because not even the most pedantic person ever bothers to tell you when it's 100 c out.
In seriousness though, the Fahrenheit scale isn't non-sense, it's just addressing things we don't much need help with anymore. The zero point was chosen as a temperature you can create reliably without particularly sophisticated tools, and the range is so freezing and boiling are 180 degrees apart, putting them on the opposite sides of a dial.
Ugh, I'm one of those people who will defend imperial as not being irrational, just built ad-hoc for purposes that aren't in alignment with modern ones and ... No, that's not what Fahrenheit is.
Fahrenheit was trying to make a temperature scale that was easy to recreate to ease the calibration of thermometers. Zero is a temperature that can be created in your garage with some ice, salt and water. 100 was his best, ultimately inaccurate, attempt to measure human body temperature, since it's another easy calibration point, and from there water was defined as 32 and 212 so that they were 180 degrees apart, which would fit will on a temperature dial.Not irrational, not a comfort scale, and not in alignment with current needs.
It's pure coincidence that it kinda lines up with comfortable outdoor temperatures in the opinion of a good chunk of a population living in the northern part of the western hemisphere.
First, you're assuming that most successful assassins are the unstable nutcases. It could just be that it's more memorable when the motivation is "make jodi foster love me" than "stop an expansionist imperialist who's destroying the lives of the common man".
You're also more likely to be a lone assassin if you don't conform to social norms because social norms say not to kill people.
The most prolific assassins are just common soldiers whose names we don't even record.
Hey, let's not turn dislike for the technology into dislike for people.
You saw someone copying and pasting back and forth between email and chatgpt, message coworkers and then work on a chart in Excel.For all you know he was using chatgpt to translate the emails, not as a prosthetic mind.
group that all had very Indian looking names
What does the ethnicity of who he messaged matter? If anything it lends credence to "guy used translation software for work email".
At no point in the 3 hour flight did a conscious thought enter his mind
completely dependent on AI. Without it their lives and careers would fall apart. This guy would pay anything for it. He cannot function without it
That's a mighty leap to make from what you described.Saying someone else didn't have conscious thought reeks of "I'm the main character and everyone else is an NPC".
There are people who use it. There are people who pay for it, and there are people who over use and over pay for it. That can be true and you can be upset by it without demoting people below "consciousness".
Conservatives seem to oscillate between isolationism and aggressive intervention. They're both from the stance of American primacy, either using our military for our benefit and to enforce our wishes or saying the world has nothing to offer us we need and that we're better off not extending effort or energy on the rest of the world.
Currently our conservatives are swinging towards isolationism, which is why the anti immigration rhetoric and pulling out of international organizations was very popular. That's not compatible with a plan to forcibly annex another country.
So for the first part, I don't disagree at all. I just don't think the logistics or theoretical necessity is a bearing on the symbolic-ness of it. Same for the effectiveness of it. Even if it changed literally nothing and no one would ever know I still wouldn't shake hands with someone I considered evil.
I don't see defining a subset of what you consider evil, like dissemination of hate speech, to be a downside.
There's a lot of complex questions around a platform curating ideological content which could possibly make them loose certain platform protections. Right now most platforms are roughly content neutral because it allows them to be viewed as platforms, rather than publishers. This is more a response to the claim that there's no reason for them not to remove ice. It may or may not be compelling, but it's a real reason.
As for the use of the word "service", sometimes my hands type slower than my brain thinks. My intent was to convey "those who develop and control the mastodon license". Hopefully my original statement makes more sense in that context.Those are the people providing the printing press schematic analog. Obviously an idea can't support an ideology in that sense.
I'm not of the opinion either supports them in a way that's worth getting angry over.We also aren't talking about being angry at ISPs for being willing to deliver packets to and from ice or Nazis, or any of the other entities that do less then the most they could possibly do to distance themselves.
Says the fact that it's come up multiple times amongst a wide swath of the open source community, and look about you. Those licenses aren't used. One or two exist and have a vanishingly small usage level and a couple more I have been "in progress" for years.The people who write most of the open source licenses have explanations for why it's not compatible.
Group behavior is a collective decision and a reflection of the group.
No, you're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm not the person you were replying to.Mastodon is a piece of software. It has a license, just like bluesky or any other. You can put a clause in the license saying the software cannot be used for the dissemination of hate speech. The open source community has discussed this and decided it goes against the principles of free software and open source.
If you're mad at one and not the other, you're applying different standards because being part of the fediverse weighs more.
Personally I hold platforms to a different standard and so I'm neither mad at mastodon nor bluesky. I just think it's hypocritical to be mad at someone for publishing a fascists letter but not be mad at the person who gave the same fascist a printing press.
So the mastodon service supports Nazis.
nobody owns it and anyone can run it
They could have chosen a license that forbid usage for spreading hate. They put "free software" and "open source" above blocking hate speech.They're providing software to Nazis, and I don't really see how that makes them better than providing a place to post.
I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm saying that the people who are saying that they've lost all faith in Americans because we haven't full actualized a revolution in less than a year are being shitty for no good reason. Armchair revolutionaries who think that it should be done now because it's supposed to be as simple as "organize, kick them out, make a new government and they all just say shucks while we arrest them".
As you said, people are getting organized. But to some people outside the US, that's not enough and we should be done deposing the government by now. That's what I'm saying is unreasonable.
Based on the finish dude in your icon and finish instance name, I'm assuming you're in Finland.Organization takes longer here than it would there based purely on population. I'm in an average sized state. Our population is twice that of Finland. The state is about the same size as the country.Even if we were all on board even for a strike, it's still gonna take longer than so many people seem to expect us to be able to do it in.
It costs a company money to process mail at their place if business. Not like, crazy amounts but someone has to open the box, see what's in it and figure out why it's there. It's probably going to cost them at least $2-$3 in time.
It's far from an effective way to cost them money, but it's $2 more than throwing a book away at your house.
Alright. How do I make that happen? I'm assuming since you're answering so confidently that you actually have an answer and have done something like this before.You certainly couldn't just be another armchair revolutionary who handwaved the entire "plan a nationwide general strike and risk execution for insurrection" based purely on what you think sounds straightforward, right?
Most revolutions have outside partisans who come and lend a hand. Why don't you come over and do that?
Maybe it's a bit trickier to organize hundreds of millions of people to have at least passive support for something and interrupt the social momentum of hundreds of years of uninterrupted peaceful transfer of power than can be accomplished in less than a year and being shitty towards the people who are upset and don't know what to do is just ... Being shitty.
Yes, that's what I'm asking for the details of how you do it. I don't know how to do a revolution. My assumption is that the people who confidently and definitely know that we're doing it wrong must have some idea how to do it right.
So again, how do I overthrow the US government?
You people dicked around so long
"So long"? What's your threshold for a reasonable timeline for a revolution to start? he hasn't even been in office a full year.
Walk me through your plan to depose the American government in less than a year. Don't forget that if you fail or are caught planning they don't just kill you, they kill you by injecting you with poison that feels like being set on fire from the inside while you suffocate, take everything you or your family possess leaving your survivors homeless and destitute, shoot your dog and probably a couple of family members too.
Like, if you've lost all faith we'll "do what needs to be done".... What needs to be done?
It's slightly more complicated than that. Still doesn't make him look good but it's more nuanced.
He was a Nazi and flagrant racist before Nazi was the unequivocally negative descriptor we think of it as today.He thought Nazism was right for America the same way he thought square dancing would keep away the blacks and that the Jews would be undercut if he did car financing without banks.
He was awful and a patriot, so when Germany went to war with America he was unequivocally in favor of destroying the Germans.He still agreed with them on everything else.
I agree that it's artificial scarcity, but I don't think the conversation is going to fully be able to move to removing that scarcity until we find a way to handle the people who rearrange the bits actually living in a world of objects and totally authentic scarcity.
It's the same dilemma we have with authors and musicians. Even if it can be infinitely copied the people who make it still need to eat, and not just be able to find a way to eat, but to reliably and predictably eat which makes donations and crowd funding iffy at best.
As a user and contributer to open source, I'm loath to put up any defense of something that irritates me more often than not. As a person who makes a living working on the closed side I can honestly say I would probably not be in the field if there wasn't as much ability to make a living in it.
Software patents can fuck off though.
I would recommend it. It can take a minute your first time through to get to some of the intense optimization stuff, but a lot of it's there really early.The dominant gameplay loop by far is "you have tools. There's a new problem to solve with those tools that's hard/tedious. Solving it means you can make tools that make the problem easier. Goto step one".
Spiders @lemmy.world Friendly little jumper helping me with the black flys
It's more complicated than that. It's literally that sometimes two of the exact same item last for radically different times. It's not a different design or manufacturing process, just an amorphous series of random factors lining up we call luck.
Mean time between failures is something they do actually measure in manufacturing, and you see interesting results like what hard drive manufacturers do to increase reliability: stress test the drives until the ones destined to fail early fail, and then sell the others.
There are things that can increase reliability, but a lot of the things that make the extreme outliers are just random, and no one documents what they were because they didn't know it was going not have an effect, good or bad.