Hey, let's not turn dislike for the technology into dislike for people.
You saw someone copying and pasting back and forth between email and chatgpt, message coworkers and then work on a chart in Excel.For all you know he was using chatgpt to translate the emails, not as a prosthetic mind.
group that all had very Indian looking names
What does the ethnicity of who he messaged matter? If anything it lends credence to "guy used translation software for work email".
At no point in the 3 hour flight did a conscious thought enter his mind
completely dependent on AI. Without it their lives and careers would fall apart. This guy would pay anything for it. He cannot function without it
That's a mighty leap to make from what you described.Saying someone else didn't have conscious thought reeks of "I'm the main character and everyone else is an NPC".
There are people who use it. There are people who pay for it, and there are people who over use and over pay for it. That can be true and you can be upset by it without demoting people below "consciousness".
First, you're assuming that most successful assassins are the unstable nutcases. It could just be that it's more memorable when the motivation is "make jodi foster love me" than "stop an expansionist imperialist who's destroying the lives of the common man".
You're also more likely to be a lone assassin if you don't conform to social norms because social norms say not to kill people.
The most prolific assassins are just common soldiers whose names we don't even record.