As much as I would like to see that happen paying to fight a court case against Conde Nast just to get a retraction that they will stick somewhere invisible doesn't really sound like a winning formula.
I mean the man is 5 or 6 distilled PowerPoints away from the people who actually know something. This coupled with the fact that he is clearly seagull management personified I'm gob smacked the (shitty) iron man image continues.
He's likely paying for this PR fluff to be written.
In a large enough group there is still anonymity even if your face and name are on there.