What system accomplishes that?
- Posts
- 9
- Comments
- 2675
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 9
- Comments
- 2675
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Showerthoughts @lemmy.world We need a tag like /s but for non-rhetorical questions
3DPrinting @lemmy.world Decent 3d scanners under $1000
Ask Lemmy @sh.itjust.works Have you ever actually had an "and then everyone clapped" moment?
Unpopular Opinion @lemmy.world I actually kinda like when curse words are censored
Home Improvement @lemmy.world Making the most of a totally dead cabinet corner?
Buy it for Life @slrpnk.net Induction range in the $1,500 ballpark without a bunch of nonsense
Out of Context Comics @lemmy.world Not sure if this breaks rule #3
DIY @slrpnk.net Breezeway Greenhouse Help?
Mildly Infuriating @lemmy.world This moon decoration my wife got
But razors aren't supposed to be logic in the first place. They're not objective analytical tools to arrive at a conclusion, because they weren't designed to be. They're framing tools to help establish an initial hypothesis.
Occam's razor doesn't claim that the simplest explanation is true, it merely says it's the most practical assumption, all else being equal. If additional data provides more support for a more complicated explanation, Occam's really doesn't require you to cling to the simpler one.
Similarly Hanlon's razor doesn't claim that stupidity is universally a better explanation than malice, only that is the most practical assumption, all else being equal. It does not require you to ignore patterns of behavior that shift the likelihood toward malice.