You mean newsmax Fox is too woke these days with their “occasional fact checking of blatant lies”.

Probably something else, these rely on qanats. It’s basically cooled by a massive open face swamp cooler which I guess does use solar energy in a number of ways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat

Against US planes? No. Even networked aa has a hard time seeing stealth planes. Our typical operation is to preprogram hard sites and destroy them with stealth bombers at extreme range. Then we come back with f15s and hammer mobile sites, then you have air superiority and there wouldn’t be much for them to do about it.

Nah dude, he’s evil but fun so fuck with him. Get another toaster and use that that to toast stuff so he’s wildly aware of how pointless he is.

No the government is made of meme people now. Good night and good luck i guess.

They claim tomahawks which are 2 million a pop.

Y’all are weird.

My opening move is always pictures of my gooch with no message like a man of true refinement.

Technically they do keep log books but if a dog doesn’t find something they just log it as trace evidence. “Some shake” " a mysterious powder" “hard crystalline substance” “there must have been people in there recently” things that would be hard to prove or disprove but maybe the hit average raise all the same.

That’s excluding killing their air supply which is traditionally how you force people to evacuate bunkers sans bunker busters or heavy bombardment.

Cool and I’m going to say you’re a shitty person for doing so.

Ok.

I’m not sure everyone knows that but they do know 911 and propaganda tells us the police will know what to do and do the right thing.

311 would almost certainly direct police at low priority.

Again I’m not sure everyone knew about that, so say for instance she didn’t know that. Are we still to blame her for someone else beating someone to death?

Yeah they’re not ideal though boss, you’re still advocating blaming a manager at mc Donald’s for the police being fucking murderers. I get the outrage but point it at the right people which happen to be politicians and lobbyists not low level corporate employees.

And after like 13 years of having it, seems late to me.

No he’s a dude with a covered Nazi tattoo he had for over a decade with knowledge it was a Nazi tattoo. No, he knew he admitted that much already, stop making argument even he won’t make.

There was a yellow power ranger too, what’s your point

Ok who should they have called. Serious question homie, what’s the perfect solution in your mind.

They called for a welfare check because they thought he was having a breakdown of some sort. That’s not a bad thing really, she shouldn’t feel bad about expecting police to help out and not literally beat a dude to death for an id they didn’t need for a trespass that was not requested.

They had pro rape protests, they’re goy and Zionists don’t see goy as fully human. Rape them, enslave them, take their homes it doesn’t matter and never really has.

https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/israelis-riot-in-support-of-torture-and-rape/

I don’t care when the tattoo is from, even he admits it’s Nazi symbology he just says he didn’t know it at the time. The rest of that is irrelevant to being suspicious of a dude with a Nazi tattoo in the same way I would be suspicious of a dude with a tattoo involving the numbers 14 and 88. Could it be innocent? Sure dude, is it “performative outrage” to question the dude because of it? Absolutely not, it would be fucking irresponsible not to.

People do contradictory shit all the time especially if it helps their end goal whatever that may be in the long run. I don’t really know one way or the other but I know I’d prefer a candidate with similar professed beliefs without a next tattoo.

What you feel to see here is that I didn’t say anything about his stances or beliefs. What you’re left with is it reasonable to be wary of dudes with Nazi tattoos? Id say yeah, and I’d question anyone that didn’t say the same.

Yeah because public Nazis exist certainly closeted Nazis don’t exist anymore, right? I said you’re being performative because questioning someone with a Nazi tattoo is definitely reasonable and logical. Their belief or disbelief of his story is their issue and wholely detached from the reasonably of questioning the tattoo in general.

You’ll notice I didn’t offer my actual opinion on him, you’re the one trying to purity test people based on a reasonable question of a public figure running for office.

No they rightfully see Nazi symbology and go “Nazi?”.

You’re the performative outrage section it seems.

That’s a business model and either way they would include expected revenue streams.