• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only people who are likely to take such a test in an anglophone country are immigrants …

      Would be interesting to see how native speakers score, though.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If you immigrate as an English speaker to Canada you have to take an English proficiency test even if it is your first language.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m guessing you could take French as well, regardless of where you’re going, right? Language equality is serious business.

          Yes, unnecessary documentation is very our style. And no guarantee you won’t have to do it again for some other entity. Somehow we’re still one of the easiest destinations to immigrate to.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m an immigrant in Germany, and they offered me an integration course when I got my spousal visa. I’ve taught those classes for the same city. They did waive my language requirement because of my master’s degree in German though, so that was nice and unexpected.

            • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              They did waive my language requirement because of my master’s degree in German

              Yes, we believe in degrees.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                To be fair, it’s a master’s in German language education, so it should really apply to the integration course as well (it’s basically a language class that focuses on things like siezten/dutzen, bureaucratic language, holidays, navigating the workplace and shared housing, and cultural quirks like not jaywalking and quiet sundays).

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              On behalf of Germans, sorry for that. It’s hard to go against the rightwing propaganda machine, but lots of people are trying.

              Come to !ich_iel@feddit.org if you want to learn some new idioms Ü

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              There is a lot of very similar vibes between the Canadian and German government, I’ve noticed. They even both love faxes the same.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, I think you just have to show proficiency in one of the official languages.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I can’t comment for the whole Anglosphere and I certainly won’t comment on NI, Wales, and Scotland, but for England:

        Pick any point on the map and move in any direction. As you move, if the average wage increases, English proficiency increases and vice versa.

        I’d say at the lowest level equivalent is France and the highest level equivalent is Denmark.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I have a hard time believing that there are regions in England where native English speakers are on the English proficiency level of France. Unless you classify any dialect as “bad English”.

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            You haven’t been to enough regions of England mate. I’m only slightly joking when I say it can get bad. Not “it’s a difficult to understand dialect” but “how the hell did you even make it through the state school system?” bad. Genuinely some of the first generation immigrants speak better English than some of the locals.

            Source: grew up in one of these regions.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes, that’s what a dialect is. Well, thanks for clearing up what you meant.

              Also, I’d assume even the heaviest dialect speaker will usually be able to write perfectly understandable sentences in a written test.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wouldn’t expect Scandinavian countries to move much. Most of them learn it to fluency as part of primary education.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If they don’t immigrate, they might still take the test for domestic purposes like proving their ability to deal with tourists or other international customers to their employers. But the test takers are definitely self-selecting, some rural greatgrandmother who barely learnt to read her native language isn’t taking that test.

    • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I find that broken English is easier to understand, compared to the time I talked to a Londoner in the bus, I could understand him but my travel buddy had no idea.

      Accents can be rough on tourists.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s known that two non-native English speakers can understand each other more easily than a non-native speaker and a native speaker. The non-native speakers are better at deciphering incorrect use of the language than the native speaker who has stricter expectations.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wonder what the numbers look like between English first language ‘with no second language experience’ versus ‘some or fluent post-childhood learning second language experience’. Because there are a lot of English only speakers.

          I’ve been told im awful to practice English with because i just understand. But i have teen/adult learning experience with two other languages.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think it has a significant impact, yes. When you understand how different grammatical structures in other languages behave, and if you are even familiar with some of the words from other languages, understanding the speaker’s incorrect English (or other language they are trying to speak with you) becomes much easier. 👍

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah i think just having experience with a different grammar at all forces you to be more flexible. When you only talk to other english speakers as a first language, the rules are somewhat rigid in the sense that everyone’s interpretation assumes your intent aligns with what is spoken. If that’s your only experience you might try to apply that assumption with non-native speakers. So I’m suggesting regardless of your knowledge of any particular other language, having learned some of any secondary language in practice forces you to re-evaluate the rigidity of those social rules and think more critically about what an English learner is trying to say.

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Exactly, it increases the plasticity of your understanding. Widens your ability to error correct on your own, and understand despite incorrect use.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        At work I had to speak my english slow and deliberate with french people when in international meetings, or they would not understand.

        The interesting part is that when doing so I picked up the “french accent” in my own English 😅.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am fully expecting England to not be at the top. Especially if written skills are measured.

        • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          There’s a related joke, about the general language skills of populations: the Luxembourgish speak four languages, the Swiss speak three languages, the Swedish speak two languages, the English speak one language and the US-americans speak half a language.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I fully expected England to be in the lowest color and am disappointed that they aren’t on the list at all.

  • whimsy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    What is the point of depicting data in this manner? The spatial coordinates have no meaning

    • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      The countries are ordered on the bend line according to their rank, so the 1-dimensional spatial coordinate system describing this line does have meaning.

      This somwhat unusual representation has the advantage that they managed to represent all datapoints with a well readable font on a graphic that fits well even on a phone’s screen, and it’s sort of eye-catching.

      It’s pretty unintuitive, though. I had to actually read and analyse it rather than just view it.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why not just use a coloured map instead? Presumably that would fit in roughly the same aspect ratio.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Whenever a few Europeans from different countries come together, there’s a joke that inevitably gets told:

    Someone who speaks many languages is multilingual. Someone who speaks two languages is bilingual. Someone who speaks one language is English.

  • chonomaiwokurae@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s hard to believe Germany is so high on the list. I visit regularly and even worked there for a while, where are all the fluent English speakers hiding?

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      The EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI) attempts to rank countries by the equity of English language skills amongst those adults who took the EF test. It is the product of EF Education First, an international education company, and draws its conclusions from data collected via English tests available for free over the internet. The index is an online survey first published in 2011based on test data from 1.7 million test takers. The most recent edition was released in November 2023.

      Wikipedia.org

      So the data is not representative for the entire population of a country.

    • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same with Austria. As a Dane living in Austria, it feels like nobody here has even half-decent English skills. It’s horrible, and I blame generations of dubbed TV and movies.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t know what study these numbers are based on, but many of them only assess certain (typically younger) age groups. In my experience, the people coming out of school today in Germany are often quite good in English.

      Edit: Looked it up. The data are not based on any study but the results of test takers that aim to earn a certain language certificate. So no specific age group but still likely younger people. The sample is completely self-selected, though, so it’s hard to say anything definitive. From the Wikipedia page:

      The EF EPI 2024 edition was calculated using test data from 2.1 million test takers in 2023. The test takers were self-selected. 116 countries and territories appear in this edition of the index. In order to be included, a country was required to have at least 400 test takers.

      And more:

      The EF English Proficiency Index has been the subject of criticism in literature. From the point of view of methodology, it suffers from self-selection bias. Instead of testing the level of English proficiency in the population, it tests the level of English of those who self-select.

      This seems like a very poor basis for a country ranking.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Currently in university or so, and there is a large countryside vs. city gap.

      In my experience there has been a relatively recent massive improvement in English skills by the younger generation. Anyone 35+ is still very much behind though. As an elder Millenial myself, it actually caught me on a wrong foot carreerwise as being able to speak English well is no longer considered to be a selection criteria for many jobs, because so many can do it and it is assume a given.

  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Was curious how Belgium would score by language region.

    Seems the Flemish part scores higher than The Netherlands while Wallonia drags everything down.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Fairly unsurprising. English is literally harder if your native language is a romance language than if it is a germanic language. Same is true for germanic native speakers who try to learn a romance language.

      • johan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Except Flemish people tend to speak good French while people from Wallonia barely speak Dutch. I agree with your statement in general, but in the case of Belgium there’s a lot more to it than that.

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        As a native English speaker, I don’t know the language rules in English, I merely speak the language. I suppose the idea is that I can think with the same grammer in English as I can in Dutch or German (except when I can’t) than with romance languages.

        But at the same time, I feel like the Spanish language, is a fairly easy language for non native speakers to learn. It’s phonetical, it’s logical, it doesn’t have ridiculous numbers or times for the clock.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          But at the same time, I feel like the Spanish language, is a fairly easy language for non native speakers to learn. It’s phonetical, it’s logical, it doesn’t have ridiculous numbers or times for the clock.

          I tried learning Spanish in school for about six years. IDK, maybe most other languages would be even harder, but I found it pretty hard, especially understanding spoken Spanish.

  • Tamlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    What’s the source for this, what does these numbers mean and how do they got these numbers, just curious

  • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I look at this and I think you know, not everything needs to be a bar chart… this is different, it’s creative, but then again, it would be better as a bar chart.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It feels like they tanked the test out of spite. I’m curious about the methodology of the study, but France has far too much tourism to believe this without seeing the underlying data.

      • Waldelfe@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean have you ever been a tourist in France? I went to Paris last year and I would have been lost without google translate. The french expect even the tourists to just learn their language.

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s kinda sick that they label everything in French to make it easy to learn the language. I visit France and Nederland as often as I can, and to be fair, even the Dutch don’t label everything in English; the people just speak it super well.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            As a German, I can read a lot of Dutch writing. Some words are seriously funny, and the accent is cute, but I usually get the gist. If not, I can always ask in English (in the western parts) or German (in the eastern parts). I can attest that the Dutch are seriously good with English.

            I think that most of this is due to TV and cinema, as everything foreign is English with Dutch subtitles, except maybe for the children’s TV.

            • Horsey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Native English speaker here, but spoke French with my father’s family about 1/2 the time: I can read and pronounce Dutch well enough that my Dutch friends understand what I’m saying (we’ve laughed about it a few times when I was unaware of a few of the weird dipthongs they have). I can’t understand nearly anything I’m saying or reading.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, it isn’t. The French are so asshole about languages that are not French, it is amazing.

      The French teachers at our kid’s school had serious penis envy because English is the first tier foreign language here, while French is only a second tier one.

      We had a French teacher who wanted to fail our son, claiming that “French is the subject that shows if you are actually smart enough for advanced schooling” - my son had the equivalent of A to A+ in all subjects but sport, arts, and French. His English teachers considered him “native speaker level”, so it was not an issue of having problems with foreign languages. But obviously all this had nothing to do with the crappy teaching methods they used that made even French native speaker students fail…

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        French teachers can be a cock sometimes, it’s 100% true. In the end of it, French grammar is far more specific than other languages, so there’s a bit of a need to be persistent and persnickety; native speaking French classes during school are noteworthy for being hard for that reason. They don’t really take the Japanese/Mandarin approach and drill you to death, instead they’ll just kinda mock you for things they think you should know. It’s super important to find a French teacher that will be detail oriented, but not a cock about it.