Sorry to be pedantic but strictly speaking "shareholder profit" isn't the issue with capitalism because that would include worker-owned cooperatives which are not causing the same problems.
The issue is the legal obligation of a private or public company to make an increase in returns for shareholders year on year.
This is why decisions like downgrading quality, design by committee to appeal to focus groups, everything becoming a subscription service, and firing staff to reduce wage overheads in the last financial quarter exist.
Because it's easier for the company directors / C-level executives to make these decisions which make line go up, rather than try to justify to shareholders why a steady or small dip in returns is necessary for longer term investment and growth.
This is compounded by the shortsightedness of companies only planning quarter to quarter then governments + central banks basing all economic decisions on GDP figures.
Because the easiest thing to make national line go up is to give tax cuts to the owning elites for them to shuffle even more money around in the stock and commodity markets, they buy up all the assets of the working class, the middle class, and the governments selling them off.
But funnily enough, centralising all the apparent wealth in the hands of a few silver-spooned arseholes is not a basis for a functioning society.
The screen reads "Bluetooth Init..." which is short for "Bluetooth Initialising" i.e. starting up, turning on, setting up.
"Innit" is a common UK slang term usually associated with chav/roadmen which means "isn't it". This is used at the end of a sentence or as an affirmation.
Do I believe in ghosts in the literal sense of an actual spirit hanging around in the physical world haunting places and people? No.
Do I think it's fascinating to see how the idea of "ghosts" are used in a cultural sense usually representing an individual or group's desires, thoughts, feelings, etc. after they've passed on and usually storytelling around respecting their wishes or finishing what they started so they can finally be "at peace"? Yes.
I also find it fascinating in a tragic way how people who've gone through extreme grief and loss can cling to the idea of ghosts, particularly of loved ones. Perhaps the pyschie doesn't want to let go of that person so much that it can manifest as audio-visual hallucinations that feel incredibly real to the individual.
After all, we all perceive the world through our brain: it is the filter for everything.
I've experienced some strange stuff personally, but I don't think I've seen an actual ghost. I remember having a dream about a close relative the night they died suddenly and we all found out in the morning. But that could be my memory post-rationalising something.
I've seen a milk bottle fly out from the back of the fridge but I swear I remember that the fridge wasn't rocking unstably and that the milk was definitely at the back of the fridge. But I could have seen incorrectly because who pays attention to the precise location of a milk bottle when opening the fridge.
And I've encountered machines that appeared to be haunted. An ex-gf's iPod classic she kept because it is a time capsule of her music would randomly turn itself on, play 10 seconds of a random song, then turn itself off again.
I can feel how a ghost story would fit all of these and feel like it would make emotional sense to me. Like there's some deep part of our evolutionary psychology that supports feeling this way. Why?
Now in that sense I believe people genuinely experienced "ghosts" that aren't actually there but are a part of their perceived reality and I find that fascinating.
I searched that wiki page for "horse" and found nothing, please can someone explain what that reference is because from the sounds of it I really don't want to search it...
Until all outside spaces are owned by someone selling the next distraction like VR wank pods, just hanging around in public spaces not spending money is made a crime, then hanging around outside just becomes straight up dangerous due to pollution, weather swinging wildly between biting winds, freezing rain, and scorching heat.
Reclaim the Outside now before there's nothing left of it!
So the mechanic of this game is you have to collect jewels for a royal whilst they struggle to escape from the hordes of "rocks" blocking their exit for some reason?
I'm starting to think that this game is from the royal's perspective and the "rocks" aren't to be taken literally.
Also I don't see how the neoliberals can't see that within a few years of implementation, productivity would jump massively as more people would be able to participate in the economy and therefore generate so much more value.
I should stress, that shouldn't be the reason for implementation, you know the usual ones about why decent healthcare should be available for free/at subsidiesed cost (depending on which style of universal healthcare implemented): it's the morally right thing to do under the hypocratic oath, every other developed country does this, etc.
I've already adopted the transparent frame: nothing to hide, only my undivided attention if they'd like to geek out about their special interests or just want someone to listen.
Not so much a hero but I admired his work the projects he is associated with: Elon regarding Tesla & Space X.
I had heard that he was a bit of a nightmare to work with but I just chalked that up to the usual tech CEO being a bit of an arsehole but still delivering the vision. So admired the projects but wouldn't personally work for him.
The first time I came across something that gave me the impression something was off with him was when he called one of the Thai cave divers a pedo after the diver rejected using an unproven single person extraction canister Elon proposed.
It was just so uncalled for. Then the more I read and saw stories about him my opinion of him wained further down to a spoilt nepo-baby cosplaying as a design engineer who'd do best to get out of the way of the actual engineers trying to do the work.
Now I think the world would be better off without him and I hope the talented engineers currently work for him leave to find fulfilling employment elsewhere in the space and electrification industries as soon as possible.
Technically they haven't paid for the feature yet, it just so happens that it's cheaper to manufacture without having a second line of non-heated seats which makes me think "why not just include heated seats (and enabled) as standard?"
Edit: Why am I being downvoted? I'm only pointing out that if BMW wanted to have a heated/non-heated seat options it costs more to set up and operate a separate manufacturing line to support both options. That's just a fact of running production lines.
Furthermore I'm questioning their business logic here with going with the subscription model because, as shown in the thread here, it only generates negative press, so why even bother with the subscription model and just have heated seats as standard. No subscription model for hardware BS needed, it makes the brand look more luxurious, and it'd be a great selling point in the dealerships to say "all these bad bois come with heated seats as standard".
They can just adjust the baseline cost to include the heated seats if they need to preserve that margin.
It's also useful to think of the "ground" plane as a sort of well of potential charger carriers that the conventional current model overlooks. Aside from simultaneously visualising what's happening inside simple ICs like BJTs / MOSFETs and the circuit diagrams I've found it a useful way for checking for common mode noise in circuit and PCB design.
I guess this makes me a lunatic? Don't know until we test it;
But who the fuck is actually introducing these bills? Which entity/organisation/individual/company are they getting the ideas from?