• BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      2 days ago

      Civilization (noun):The stage of human social and cultural development and organization that is considered most advanced.

      The definition Oxford Languages uses is:

      “they equated the railroad with progress and civilization”

      I hate to say it, but Trump used the correct definition of civilization in regards to his destruction of civilian infrastructure. It doesn’t imply genocide.

      • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s not the meaning of civilization he’s using.

        The Oxford Learners Dictionary you used also defines one of the meanings as

        a society, its culture and its way of life during a particular period of time or in a particular part of the world

        That’s the definition he’s using, and it’s definitely genocide.

        • dipcart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lol thank you for teaching that other commenter about how words can have multiple meanings.

          Also, if you’re bickering about the definition of ‘civilization’ when you’re talking about what constitutes genocide, you’re probably committing genocide.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Infrastructure can’t “die”. He’s taking about people, their culture, and everything that makes them who they are. He’s not talking about bridges.

      • abaddon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had the same “well technically” thought at first but destroying that much infrastructure will result in some immediate deaths and mass casualties later. So maybe not technically genocide but in reality it’s close.

        • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure what my argument is exactly; I looked up the definition of civilization because I was bored and was shocked when Trump’s statement made literal sense.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s because anything coherent from him wasn’t written by him.

            You’d think they’d do a better job managing him like they did with Reagan

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I ever found myself saying “a whole civilization will die tonight if I don’t get my way”, I think I’d just kill myself. What an utterly disgusting thing to threaten. He is truly devoid of any humanity at this point.

  • Redditsux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the stupid US laws don’t persecute this war criminal, international court should. There’s more than enough evidence.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump will nuke Iran, and the trolls on here will still insist Kamala would have done the same thing.

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump has been itching to use the nukes since minute one. I can easily see him dropping one on a city in Iran, and then threatening to drop another every day until they surrender and open the strait. While that is absolutely horrific, the irony is that Trump is too fucking stupid to see that the “whole civilization” that will die is the U.S… The world will shun the U.S., dump it’s bonds and destroy the dollar. There will be hyperinflation, bank runs, chaos, and a hard splinter of the U.S. into factions and likely a “hot” civil war. Trump will make clear that all of the “fearmongering” from radical Islamists about the U.S. and the western world was true, potentially igniting world war. None of this will take away from the tragedy in Iran, which just happened to be the convenient target Trump the bully thought he’d punch down on.

      • coyootje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think what you’re describing here is the best case scenario (if he would drop one). The worst case scenario (the one I’m most worried about) is that other (adversarial) nuclear powers react to the US launching one by launching their own, aimed at either the US, Israel or (worst of all) somewhere unrelated, like someplace in Europe or on Kiev.

        • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is very much a risk. When chaos rules, it becomes very difficult to anticipate all the potential consequences.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yep they don’t gave the balls and well justify it somehow. As cutting off the US would shrink their economy. It sucks and I wish countries would but they won’t.

    • spagbolioli@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If he does, Israel will get so heavily nuked it will be a dead zone

      Russia, China, Pakistan even India would be heavily impacted, all nuclear armed states

      I can’t see this working out well for America’s greatest ally ever but won’t put boots on the ground

      America desperately needs a military coup

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        If Israel gets nuked, it will do the Samson Doctrine, which is:

        Nuke every nearby national capital, friend or foe.

        Europe, Turkey, Egypt, fuck it.

        That’s been their nuclear doctrine since they’d had nukes, which is roughly the 1970s.

        BTW, they learned how to build nukes, in part, via stealing nuclear material from the US.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_affair

        The most insane thing about all of this is that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons.

        But Israel does, and has for decades.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump is an idiot. The rest of his people vary from incompetent to simply evil.

      I’d bet my life that the nuclear briefcase that Trump masturbates to every night is a fake. Someone in his circle has long since clipped the red wire to prevent him doing just that during a midnight Truth Social post.

      • GardenGeek@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        This was / would have been the case during Trump I … since he scraped anyone with at least a bit of reason from his admin in favor of yes-man following his ideology… I’m disturbingly unsure if you’re right under for Trump II.

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Possibly, but its more likely that he just commits more warcirmes and further undermines American hegemony. The point of the far left in advocating for Trump was accelerationist; it’s that he would speed up the collapse of the American Empire. No one expected that this would come without a heavy cost. Kamala would have just delayed the inevitable by a few more years.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, Trump has to be someone’s fault, and if you don’t blame the leftists who complained about Kamala, then someone could end up blaming her, otlr the people who put her up, or kept Biden up, or even remember when people called Sanders the last off-ramp from the apocalypse. And we can’t have that, can we?

        • Tolc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump isnt a fault, he is a true manifestation of whatever the US represents, whatever it has stood for and what does neo liberalism and capitalism leads to. Removing Trump wont solve anything, a decade down the line someone more deranged and unhinged will replace him.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m looking at the /r/conservative subreddit right now. Of the comments that weren’t removed (and there aren’t that many, that place is a partisan shithole and a comment graveyard), it’s just accusations of Iranian bots, claims that the Democrats are clutching at pearls, and mental gymnastics claiming that this is part of Trump’s playbook…

    How many world leaders have you seen make vulgar and genocidal threats like Trump has over the last few days?

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      How many world leaders have you seen make vulgar and genocidal threats like Trump has over the last few days?

      I can think of another one of the criminal, Bibi Netanyahu.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Putin just threatened to Nuke Ukraine so… I guess the late night gossip calls got then both thinking in unison.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Russia was ‘threatening’ to nuke the collective West for ages, literally at least twelve years now. Mostly via other people though, Pu normally doesn’t do such ramblings himself.

        However, Pu knows that bullshit sabre-rattling is different from actually doing things. With Trump, who ever knows what he’s thinking.

    • Alberat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve seen a good amount of people at least saying its a bad look for trump at least… some are still clinging on though… idk…

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is a pretty straightforward declaration of genocidal intent. If the Americans bomb civilian infrastructure, there is a credible case for accusing them of Genocide in the Hague.

    EDIT: Historian Timothy Snyder also identified it as such, pointing that this creates legal liabilities up and down the American state: https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-president-speaks-genocide

  • Karna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago
    • Trump will again chicken out.
    • He thought (or made to believe) Regime change in Iran will a walk in the park.
    • Given the situation he is currently in, he just wants to save his face by any mean.
    • Dropping Nuke is biggest threat he can think of.
    • He don’t have the guts to follow it through.
    • He will just extend the deadline, or declare himself a winner and left Middle East to its fate.
    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      one would also hope the military would not follow such blatantly illegals orders… but my hope on that is dwindling

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        One of the House reps just put in a resolution to impeach Hegseth, so there’s that.

      • redditmademedoit@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        What recent months have thaught us is that there are only two types of Americans: those that will actively fuck over the world and those that will them.

        Trump cannot be undone by Americans, because they all either actively or passively support and enable him. The only possible solution is foreign intervention. Since European leaders are just as useless as the Americans and the Chinese have their own insane imperialist ambitions, I guess we’re all shit out of luck.

        • Karna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump cannot be undone by Americans, because they all either actively or passively support and enable him

          The number of people joined the latest “No King” protest march across States draws a very different picture though.

          • redditmademedoit@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Dude, your governement is verbatim (!) talking about killing whole civilzations.

            The ratio of Americans that would take the risk of imporisonment or individual harm VS Americans that will risk their lives and die for killing babies (for no apparent reason) basically remains 0 : ∞.

            It’s the most armed and violent country in the civilzed world and still it remains perfectly safe to be an operative of the fucking apocalypse.

      • Karna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        He will wake up tomorrow, and forget all about the veiled nuke threats he made a day before.

        Tonight both US and Israel will likely hit harder (compared to what we already witnessed before), leaving a long trail of death (of civilians) and destruction of civilian properties and infras.

        Tomorrow the pedo president will claim he sent Iran to stone age, and (again) proclaim victory in this war.

      • 4grams@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s just been itching to use a nuke since his first term. He has talked about it, joked, even suggested it might be on the table. Let history be your guide, this asshole has a pattern. I’m scared as hell.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I actually think the guy is just old man wants to see war time stuff he thinks is tough happen while he is alive and thinks history books will really remember his name if he dropped a nuke.
        He wants heaven and heaven to him is everyone knowing his name.

  • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I for one am very thankful for our beautiful Democratic Party, which while all this craziness has entered a fever pitch, they have been loudly and boldly speaking out against this every minute of the day and not focusing on unimportant matters like trying to trash talk Hasan Piker and taking personal vacations to the beach.

  • 20cello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s going to nuke them ,almost the same words were used moments before the hiroshima bombing

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the first time I think someone’s gonna drop a nuke and that it can actually happen.

      If the pedohitler really drops a nuke, it’s gonna be over for Iran but mostly for the US. Dropping a nuke is basically admitting they have lost not just the war but their own society.

      • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 days ago

        Immediate global pariah. All agreements with a rogue nuclear state would immediately be voided. All trade ceases, all loans rescinded. Every US base would be evacuated and be blown up from afar by their host countries. The word American would become a synonym for murderer.

        • kcweller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          European leadership will still be kissing “Daddy” Trumps little asshole even after nuking Iran. They haven’t shown any sign of resistance up until now, what is a few extra dead Iranians going to change for western leaders?

          Its fucking disgusting, but the greatest risk to world peace seems to be western civilization.

          Fuck USA Fuck Israel Fuck war

          • Eril@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t want it to be like that and I want to believe EU leaders would immediately ditch the US. But I fear you are right…

          • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s one thing to be a unreliable, distasteful ally who at least has common enemies.

            It’s another thing to be a bigger genocider than Stalin and Hitler combined and knowingly rolling the dice on the end of the world.

            Europe knows the US sucks, but it’s better than the alternatives at the moment. Letting a nuke slide is not an acceptable alternative for any country in the world. The US would immediately be a common enemy of every country in the world, and even the most cynical, bootlicking neoliberal cannot go against that.

            Or maybe the political class is just all lizard people and waiting for the moment to Kill The Poor.

        • [object Object]@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s delusional. The EU would never stop trading with the US unless the US attack European mainland.

          Their whole reaction to the war so far was making frowny faces.

        • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Also the Russians would rightly be terrified they’d be next and could launch a pre emptive nuclear strike to decapitate the US and israel.

          Why the downvotes?

          • antonim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t give us too much hope!

            (I’m pretty sure Russia doesn’t give a shit about Israel, and has nothing to fear from US, considering how friendly Trump is towards Putin)

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        If a nuke is dropped it’s over for the world. Mutually assured destruction guarantees this.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, the rest of the world isn’t just going to instantly nuke the US. If Iran gets nuked it won’t be via an ICBM but more likely a traditional aircraft or possibly ship launched nuke. Until it goes off it won’t look too much different from any of the other weapons being dropped on Iran. What it would do though is instantly turn the US into even more of a pariah than it already is. You’d likely see pretty much instant sanctions across the board which would tank the US economy, and might finally manage to get Trump impeached and convicted. Might even be able to convince the spineless bastards in Washington to hand Trump over to the ICC in exchange for lifting some of the sanctions.

          • marx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            How can they sanction us when global finance still overwhelmingly depends on the dollar though? It would certainly accelerate efforts to move to a new financial regime but it would still take years to accomplish.

            Maybe mass dumping of US treasuries could be a feasible immediate option.

            • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 days ago

              How can they sanction us when global finance still overwhelmingly depends on the dollar though?

              The world has been gradually de-dollarizing for over a decade now. USD held as global currency reserves has fallen from 70% to 40%. BRICS nations are implementing their own payment systems based on the renminbi, and the eurozone obviously can operate independently already.

              A lot of global value is tied up in US investment systems, sure. But a nuke drop would make that value not very valuable anymore. It would suck and the world would be stuck in another great depression, but the rest of the world has plenty of functional financial systems to keep moving on.

          • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Theres every reason to think the Russians would consider a nuclear trigger-happy US an existential threat to them and launch a pre emptive attack. After all, the US (through Ukraine) launched attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers and Putins nuclear bunker which would have been considered suicidal during the Cold War

            If a nuclear weapon is used all bets are off.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Preemptive attacks don’t work when they will nuke you back. This is the principle behind Mutually Assured Destruction.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  First you said Russia, not the US, would do a preemptive nuclear attack. So this isn’t about Trump, it’s about Putin.

                  Second, Russia wouldn’t do it because of MAD. That’s the whole concept of MAD.

                  You’re making no sense, so I think I’m gonna peace out.

        • Ontimp@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not immediately with Iran, but even if it would be a singular nuclear strike without any reaction, it would cross maybe the only real red line that still exists in international relation; Russia might then use nukes in Ukraine, or China in Taiwan, even if only for the EMP or to sink a fleet of ships at once. It will cause a dam to break regarding the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

          • marx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m with you on Russia but I don’t think the PLA would consider nuking Taiwan. They ideologically consider everyone on the island to be Chinese and they also certainly don’t want to blow it to ashes just to have to rebuild it from scratch.

            IMO the wind is blowing toward a political reunification where China takes it without a shot. The opposition party is already pushing that and the US is not a stable or reliable enough ally at this point for them credibly rely on if China actually invades.

            • Ontimp@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not on the island but if the US now starts using tactical nukes in Iran, the nuclear power China would seriously consider its own tactical nuclear use cases - after all what’s the value in being a nuclear power if it’s a forgone conclusion that you won’t use them. Doubly so should the US prove it’s willingness to use tactical nukes now, as China would then need to expect that nukes might be used against them too, should it come to a military exchange with the US over Taiwan. It’s mutually assured destruction, but instead of destroying cities with ICBMs you sink each other’s aircraft carriers with smaller nukes.

              Regarding Taiwan itself, I think there would be valid use cases, especially for the massive EMPs given off by nukes detonated in the atmosphere. They can disable an army of drones and most civilian communication systems all at once, which seems like a very solid first strike move if you don’t want to destroy the country but cause enough disruption to allow an invasion force to land.

              I’m not a military strategist though, so no guarantees on any of this.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                They consider Taiwan part of China. They would see nuking Taiwan as nuking their own left hand. Very unlikely.

                • Ontimp@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  As I said, I completely agree regarding the island itself. I see that even the atmospheric use might be unrealistic there.

                  But if the US establishes that the use of tactical nukes is acceptable, I doubt they’d have the same qualms when it comes to ships or drones of the US Navy.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think Iran has nukes, and every other country will probably be very careful about dropping a nuke in the US. Maybe some rogue country would drop one to israel but I’m not sure this would happen becaues of MAD.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You misunderstand MAD. That applies between nuclear states. No one will be rushing to launch retaliatory nukes on Iran’s behalf.

          Still fucked, and who knows maybe they have something capable of hitting Israel

          • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 days ago

            Iran can however launch everything they have at the gulf states and israel, destroying all of their desalination plants and oil production and basically wiping them off the map and turbofucking the global economy into something worse than the great depression. They’ve been holding back so far, but if they get nuked they may as well just pull the trigger.

          • Substance_P@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know, maybe Russia, China and if there is mass global destabilization India, Pakistan, and North Korea could get trigger happy.

            • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              China has pretty clearly shown they are staying out of it. I also doubt Russia would fire at America over Iran. Although I’d wager they would nuke Ukraine given that the US just normalized it.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          MAD is when the other country can nuke you back. That doesn’t exist here. (As far as everyone knows.)

        • quips@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Someone does not know what he is talking about. This is not the 60’s.