Though the ideas espoused for the revolution might be grand, the cause and motivation behind those who joined the revolution was purely monetary.
Rich didn't like being taxed so they made their slaves join the army.
George Washington didn't like the fact that the British having lost the French Indian war made a pact with the Indians which stopped his business of prospecting.
The American revolution was a war of businessmen against the government in England. The government was and is the same; in the past only rich, land owning white men could vote or form government. Now it is the corporations or rich white men.
I don't want my kid to be a doctor. Why would I want anyone to be over worked, under paid, under appreciated and always blamed for everything under the sky.
No, if he is earning a billion a year that's too low. But most billionaire have familial wealth and might be earning a few millions in a month. I don't mind taking a million or two off of it even if he is not earning anything.
I'm not sure Modi would feel so happy if we were to walk around hand in hand with Xi if China was invading India or whoever the leader is of Pakistan while they were suicide bombing India
It wouldn't be anything new, US had been doing it since India's independence. Even now it is continuing it's bon homie with Pakistan because India didn't stroke Trump's ego.
Having said that though, I disagree with the direction the government is taking. India nonetheless does have very consequential strategic millitary relationship with both Russia and Israel. Developed during cold war and continuing to this day.
He always seemed to be a shady character, I mean who leaves gifts for kids for free. How does that make any economic sense? /S