Triumph

“Even assuming that the IGA comports with Article II, Plaintiffs’ inability to perform their duties for 30 days is not irreparable harm. Moreover, if the IGs were reinstated, the President could lawfully remove them after 30 days by providing the required notice and rationale to Congress.”

The “irreparable harm” is that the president is being allowed to break the law without consequence. Reinstate them, and if he wants to fire them again, make him do it.

Yes, people are still talking about the FCC chair and the president violating the First Amendment with exactly zero consequences.

AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAA –

inhale

– HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

They decided there was too many of him.

The squirrels on campus back in the day were so used to people. We’d go with a bag of peanuts and they would all come running. Some would sneak in and steal them out of the bag, others would eat them out of your hand, a couple would go wherever you led them, including on top of my head or in the palm of my outstretched hand. And then sit there and eat the peanuts.

Revolutions are never “legal”.

You anti-gun and anti-car people …

I’m carrying right now. If you pull the trigger, you are responsible for the bullet.

We are all objects on this glorious day.

I’m being radicalized by a fascist government. But I’m not a “youth”.

Strictly speaking, yes, but the word carries a “trained [pseudo-]military actor” connotation that “shooter” doesn’t. The choices people make in the words they use are important to pay attention to.

Acting ICE director is calling the shooter a “sniper”, probably to paint the shooter as a “combatant”. Because they want it to be a war.

Live and learn. You won’t make the same mistake again.

Yes, I just read it. I blame society.

I don’t even know what you’re talking about, but whatever it is, you’re still here (in a “cosmic” sense, if you feel like fucking off from fediverse, you do you), and that’s what matters.

Also literally an unconstitutional abridgement of 1A rights. The president threatening and extorting people and businesses, using the weight and power of the federal government, because of legal speech is in direct violation of the First Amendment.

Back in my day, if a US president did that, there would be consequences, but here we are.

TIL! Thank you! It does look a lot like a young cuttlefish, though.

We know you live there sadly. It’s Oklahoma.

That’s because that’s true.

A question was asked. I answered it. Please indicate where I was “unwilling[] to reason”.

Far west of Houston? All those kids are used to guns already.