It’s literally in the name! Congress controls the Library of Congress.

While the goal might be correct, this isn’t going to do shit. This is a non-story, Trump is just redoing something he did in his first term already that failed. The headline is what Trump is after, this is just a PR move.

I mean there’s a good chance. Air traffic control in the US is hanging by a thread.

It is simultaneously the most promising and most dangerous tech imaginable. There are so many amazing and wonderful things it could enable. There are so many horrifying and terrible ways it could go wrong. It has to be approached with utmost caution and incredibly well thought out regulation and standards. I’m not sure I trust any government or institution in existence in the world currently to manage it the way it needs to be.

The problem is who’s going to stop him? He already said he’s planning to run for a third term. Track record isn’t looking great, he seems to have figured out that if he just does things and ignores the law nobody stops him.

If Trump somehow loses the next election they need to throw the entire book at him, then write a new book and throw that at him as well. We also need to add a few more amendments to the constitution to prevent this shit from happening again. Maybe eliminate political parties? Not sure exactly how to fix this but it’s blatantly broken right now.

Absolute fastest way to kill this shit? Feed the entire Disney catalog in and start producing knockoff Disney movies. Disney would kill this so fast.

That privilege does not extend to ongoing crimes or future crimes. Lawyers have an obligation to act to prevent harm to both their client and others. If you were to tell your lawyer you kidnapped someone and locked them in your basement, they’re absolutely going to tell the police about it so that person can be rescued. Past crimes may or may not be confidential depending on the nature of them. For instance if you admit to molesting a kid in the past that’s currently living with you the lawyer would likely report that because it’s highly likely you would molest that child again in the future. It’s all contextual, but there is no absolute right to confidentiality.

Past crimes, when there’s no reason to believe you would commit another crime in the future are covered by confidentiality. However if the lawyer believes you intend to continue committing crimes or that you have admitted that you plan on committing a crime are not covered. So yes, your lawyer could be a witness against you if you admit to planning a crime you have either not yet committed, or which you hadn’t committed at the time you told your lawyer but subsequently then committed.

There’s also a question on whether admitting to crimes unrelated to your current case is covered by confidentiality or not. I’m not entirely clear on if that applies, but I think E.G. if a lawyer is representing you on a robbery case and you admit to him you murdered somebody 5 years ago he might be allowed to tell the police about that without breaking his obligation of confidentiality since that admission is entirely unrelated to the current case.

There is no absolute confidentiality even with therapists and lawyers, they’re both obligated to report anything said to them that they believe indicates you’re planning to commit a crime or do harm to yourself or others. You can’t just walk into your lawyers office and go “so I was molesting this eight year old” and expect them not to report that.

Confidentiality agreements do not cover illegal acts. Since you brought up the bar association, fun fact about that is that if you admit to say abusing a child to your lawyer not only is that not covered by attorney-client privilege the lawyer is obligated to inform law enforcement or face punishment by the bar association for failing to do so.

I read the headline and was prepared to support the church on this one (for once). Then I read the first paragraph of the article. I have never made a 180 on an opinion so fast. The fuck is wrong with the Catholic church and child abuse? Why is this a constant problem with them?

For once China didn’t do shit. Trump closed the US market all on his own and now that the entirely predictable outcome occurred (that he was warned about repeatedly before hand) he’s throwing a tantrum and blaming everyone else (as he does).

The religion is just an excuse, what they’re really looking for is a small and weak minority group that they can attack without getting too much pushback. At something like 1.5% of the population trans people are a small enough minority without too much existing case law defending them so they’re an easy target.

Ultimately Republicans have to have a minority to attack because it distracts the public from noticing how everything else the Republicans are doing is hurting everyone but a select few rich people. It’s political slight of hand, watch the rights violations over here so you don’t notice the embezzlement over there.

Yes but if they weren’t spending all their time oppressing minority groups they’d have to solve actual problems and that’s hard.

Why not both?

Make it even simpler abolish organized religion. You’re free to do whatever you want in the privacy of your home, but get rid of all the temples, churches, mosques, and synagogues. No tax exemptions for religious organizations either (and that one change would kill most Christian churches practically over night).

For a brief window Tesla was the only company making a “good” EV in that all their competition was making cars with sub 150 mile range (sometimes significantly so). Teslas have always been bad cars, but they were the best EV. Then all the other manufacturers finally got the memo that they couldn’t keep ignoring the EV market and grudgingly made decent EVs which almost by default made Tesla the worst EV on the market.

The loophole that seems to be being exploited is that they’re allowed to redefine existing federal lands as military bases thus side stepping posse comitatis act. I don’t think they can just declare any land (E.G. state owned or privately owned land) part of a military base and there’s likely knock on effects from that as well. For instance I’d be surprised if there aren’t various laws about who and how you’re allowed to access “military bases” and therefore they can’t just slap one in the middle of a campus at least not without opening a giant can of worms.

Sounds like this is less about weakening the US, Trump has that well in hand all by himself, and more about strengthening China and Russia.