• adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    243
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    When the war was turning in Ukraine’s favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They’re presumably talking about the Kursk Oblast. Edit: probably not, see responses.

        • altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          1 month ago

          IIRC that was long after that. The initial shutoff of Starlink happened around the explosions targeting the Crimean bridge and them introducing their naval drones.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.

        • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure it is. You just confiscate the infrastructure that operates them here on earth, and order their employees to comply.

          I don’t think that this would be a good idea, but it is definitely doable.

          • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            When it comes to stuff like this, the USA is like a tax heaven: outside of international jurisdiction and never signed any cooperation agreement with foreign powers. The USA is the best place to run shady business right now

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Musk and Starlink aren’t major difference makers in this war. It’s a years-long slog where the main takeaway is “cheap and reliable in volume is more than a match for the newest and fanciest.” It hasn’t been on the verge of turning in Ukraine’s favor since the end of Russia’s initial push towards Kyiv.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Everyone who disagrees with me is a Russian” was ran into the ground five years ago, get new material.

          But yes, a steel cage offering significant protection against much more modern technology is a great example of what I’m talking about.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have a buddy who’s been eating/sleeping/breathing this war and, hands down, cheap and reliable FPV drones have changed how warfare is done. It’s the main reason why trench warfare came back, and one of the things that fucked Russia up in the mid-term. Apparently they have a long-standing strategy that involves armor and something something something that my buddy explained and I don’t remember, but because there’s always drones watching every inch of the front at all times, Ukraine was able to bust that strat by being able to dial in artillery fast and early. At least, that’s how I’m remembering what was explained.

        • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not rly the ability of drones to observe that makes them so strong, but the ability to attack. Russia’s air defense is unable to stop a drone swarm, especially because its something the world hasn’t yet seen. And if two drones armed with explosives take down a bigass helicopter, that’s a massive win.

          A few weeks ago, Ukraine decimated an oil refinery on russian territory with a swarm of drones of which only 40% were taken down by the russian air defense.

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think it might be more fair to say that it isn’t just the ability to observe. Drones have absolutely transformed the modern battlefield.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          cheap and reliable in volume

          cheap and reliable FPV drones have changed how warfare is done

          We’re in agreement here. I’m not saying new technology is useless, I’m saying there aren’t any wonder weapons (or wonder communication systems) that would have given Ukraine a decisive advantage.

          Long-term, it’s still a matter of which side can outproduce the other when it comes to the cheap and reliable equipment we’re talking about. At this point that’s clearly Russia.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no I’m hearing from people that wa a technical glitch.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Close. There was a geobarrier that he refused to remove. Because attacks against Russia are aggression.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    ·
    1 month ago

    He also challenged Zuck to a cage match and chickened out when Zuck accepted. They’re both pieces of shit.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He even chickened out of his recent offer to come on the Daily Show and debate Jon Stewart! He’s a Nazi coward even when it’s just talking…

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Did he officially bow out then? Jon gave him all the conditions he wanted too…

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol I forgot about that! Yeah fuck em both of course, but I feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept control of freakin’ Russia over nepo-baby “gamer”, “engineer” Musk. What a goofy threat. And I say that as a middling gamer and engineer myself lol

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept contr

        Putin is 5’ 7", like 160 lbs, and 70 years old. Elon is 6’2", probably 200 lbs, and 52 years old.

        I don’t think fitness and training can overcome 20 years, 50 lbs, and a full head of height.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          and a full head of height.

          I thought you were gonna say “full head of transplanted hair,” but I was disappointed. I’ve seen tiny guys take on bigger dudes when they have more skill. The age thing is more what I might think of as an advantage for that doughy chud.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Musk is so fucked up he’s gonna make some noises, groan, then shit himself after the first attempt at a swing

          70’s isn’t too shabby in this day and age for a well kept physique, it’s 80+ the rot cements itself.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Tweet linked in the OP is Musk claiming that he challenged Putin to a fist fight.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate Zuck but in this match I’m thinking if it’s not mutually assured destruction, then I might root for Zuck. Elon is becoming a very big problem.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t respect Putin very much, but I am 1000 percent sure that a former KGB agent will whoop Musks ass. Apart from that, wtf is he trying to show with challenging Putin to physical combat. What does that have to do with Ukraine?

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The 600 series had rubber skin. We spotted them easy, but these are new. They look human…sweat, bad breath, everything.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        67
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s faster, cheaper, and on the tech side more reliable (definitely not politically reliable though).

      • learningduck@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

        They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

          The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 month ago

        Now, I don’t know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that’s only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

      • Inktvip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Starlink has enough uplink to be able to handle live video streams and a latency low enough to do this with simple tools.

        I’m not sure if that still happens, but I’ve seen some pictures of Ukrainian command bunkers literally getting drone feeds using discord screen share.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oligarchs used to act the part, and have the appearance of being “classy”.

    Now Oligarchs are just a bunch of 4chan users.

    Wtf is: “Be quiet, small man”

    That’s not an elegant way of speaking.

    These people are supposed to be “upper class”?

    🤣

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, Elon thinks it’s elegant. As in “Ha ha, I spoke like a big boy. I heard that badass line on TV once, on one of those shows I’m not supposed to watch. Bet that guy is now red on face and is so distraught he won’t be able to eat broccoli on supper and his mom will yell at him. Owned.”

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Really dude ?? 4Chaners are smarter than Elon, Elon is the definition of rock-bottom

    • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Be quiet, small man” sounds like a thing Dennis would scream at Mac in IASIP 😄 THE GOLDEN GOD! Dude is copying a comically psycho character from a show, thinking he’s being sooo cool 😎

    • sakodak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s literally an expression of the outsized amount of power this dipshit wields due to his enormous stolen wealth.

      He says that to a member of the Polish government to remind him that he is powerless and owned by the capitalist class.

      “Be quiet small man” with an implied “I own you.”

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 month ago

    If America was a real country this guy would’ve immediately been removed from any and all companies he runs.

    Does SpaceX not have a board?

    • phampyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except for the fact that he doesn’t make anything, he pays people who do, then takes the credit for it. Is his way with everything: companies, gaming profiles…

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I get what you’re saying, but I refer to my car as…my car. I didn’t turn a wrench in its construction, nor did I design it, but it’s still mine.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean he doesn’t own it, SpaceX does. And he owns a bit less than half of SpaceX, though he retains most boring power.

      • Betty_Boopie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        “I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army.”

        It’s the first sentence of the quoted tweet.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The interior, initial Musk tweet. It’s a snippet in the middle of a sentence.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s quite an interesting insight into what kind of thing Musk himself feels is a great insult (hence he is susceptible to it) as well as how much Musk thinks his opinion counts for people such as the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs, all of which dovetails with the idea that the guy suffers from both Megalomania and Narcisistic Personality Disorder.

      For any reasonably well adjusted person in a position of responsability such as being the Foreign Minister of a country the size of Poland (or, frankly, for anybody self-aware and self-confident), being called “small man” by somebody like Elon Musk is roughly the equivalent in importance to being barked at by a dog that cannot actually harm you.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        For a person who is afraid of being assassinated, he’s pissing off a lot of people with the resources who could get him assassinated.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s weird: Musk and Trump are doing exactly what one would if they were Russian assets, bent on destroying western alliances… You don’t have to believe all the evidence that they are… Just imagine that these 2 billionaires are compromised. What would they do at this exact moment in history…?

    • Renohren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s called One Web by Eutelsat. Same latency and reliability, but less Mb/s about 70 Mb/s (and does it matter much for the few Kb packets to relay small amounts of data?).

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Eutelsat

        Eutelsat has about 9% the number of satellites and Starlink is expanding fast. This significantly limits the potential backhaul, which is why Eutelsat doesn’t really focus on consumers, but rather governments and enterprise. They don’t have the backhaul to offer wide consumer products. Their cost of launch is 10x higher than Starlink, at least, so they’ll never be able to compete in backhaul or the consumer space. Of course they could contract SpaceX to launch their satellites, but then they’re basically paying the competition to operate, and this power imbalance would be immediately leveraged to their detriment.

        The bottom line here is that competitors need reusable rockets, and no one else is even close. However Musk put together the company and strategy pushed space transport forward by decades in a very short space of time, and it’s unlikely another Musk figure emerges in Europe. I do not subscribe to the common notion that if we throw enough money at the problem we can solve it. Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin confirms this. It appears to require an appetite for extreme risk; the will to blow up hundreds of expensive rockets; and likely a penchant for the disregard of existing safety laws. The EU would never permit this.

        • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Correct. The EU and its cadres of Brussels technocrats cornered the law in multiple angles so a risky (yet massively profitable and useful) venture like SpaceX would never find the right conditions to exist

          • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Its a tricky balance, on one hand the US system has createst the most profitable and capable companies on earth, on the other hand its also created the most powerful and regulation capturing companies on earth.

        • Renohren@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I don’t really believe in the financial aspects of reusable rockets, but I tend to believe in the financial aspects if an air force gives you free launch sites then a US state gives you public land to use as you wish without any supervision. Using taxes to pay for something and call it cheap, as shameful with spaceX as it is for EU healthcare (except in one case it benefits one company, in the other whole nations).

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            I’m not really sure I understand what you’re arguing here. That reusable rockets are easy to build as long as the government gives one some land to use? If that were true we would have had reusable rockets many decades ago.