lol smh

Yes, that’s why you can’t respond with more than two words, but still have to reply, despite having to also avoid the topics of our language skills and what your comment at the start of this thread meant.

It really is weird that you have this pathological avoidance yet obsess over replying here.

We both know you read it. We both know which of us has more language skills, and we both know what you meant at the start of the thread.

Explicitly combatants… and anyone who happens to be in their vicinity when the bomb goes off.

“Extremely” targeted you say? So when they were detonated, the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians?

You started this with “thats why it’s important to have a lot of cameras”, to which someone responded “so the cops can shut them off, like they did Afroman’s?”, to which you responded “cops wouldn’t…”

Then I entered the conversation, because you’ve asserted what cops would and wouldn’t do, showing just how much faith — wrongly, though — you have in the justice system.

You’re just really hard trying to ad hoc what you said, but unlike in real life, what has been said is actually on record, so bullshitting your way out of this doesn’t work as easily as with your mates in the pub.

Weird how you yourself commented on the “language barrier” and what you thought was an incorrect use of the English language, yet now have completely shut up about it, almost as if you’re avoiding comparing your language skills to mine. Perhaps because you don’t like feeling stupid?

Ah, so… what exactly is the reason that you think having video of cops makes you safe?

You’re trying to avoid seeming foolish. Like when you tried to correct my English.

So… how many languages do you speak?

You use “being on camera” to imply that since they’re on camera, they’ll face consequences for whatever they might do.

With law enforcement, that isn’t nearly as probable as you think. I hope you have those feeds recording to a server that isn’t located on the same premises, at the very least. Even if you have the material though, it usually doesn’t mean a thing. Cops can justify pretty much anything in the US, and the justice system tends to go their way. Sure, you can show a few examples of cops actually sentenced, but for each one, there’s at least a dozen cases of officers who got off scot-free or with a warning, and a hundred more who weren’t even investigated.

And as to your pitiful attempts at insults with your assumption that your English is better than mine? I’ve more than likely used English longer than you. More than you. In addition, I speak another language on a native level and several others on a customer service level. How many do you speak?

By tracking who sent what to whom?

And since tracking the devices is actually impossible, how would you know which pager is where and held by whom,

Say one of the pagers wasn’t delivered to the person who you “know” it to belong to. Say it got dropped in front of a school. Say another person who has one and even is a Hezbollah member, is visiting a children’s hospital, because they’re people too and usually have reasons to fight (even if their fighting style is immoral to some). Say another is eating dinner with his family. Etc. Etc. Etc.

There’s no way to verify any of that. It’s basically just as bad if not worse than carpet-bombing. Unless you implant a device like this on a person and then have surveillance on that person to know where they are and who with when you detonate the device, you’re probably doing a war crime.

You can’t track a pager.

A mobile tower will send it a message, but since there’s no two-way communication, theres no way to track where the pager received the message. (Even if it was a two-way one, you need at least three good points of connection to be able to triangulate it.)

So how exactly do you identify who’s using a pager you don’t even know the location of?

You obviously don’t know how tracking works.

Ditto

Which explains why the IDF has had so many “accidents” recently.

A almost 50 year old man doesn’t want to look uncool on his bike.

Have you noted to him how fucking uncool it is for a grown man to think safety (especially of children) is uncool?

Takes just one slipup of someone, not even them, but just someone in traffic, and he will never forgive himself his shitty attitude.

I’m not trying to change th3 subject mr “cops won’t get away with anything in my house”

Now I realise it’s a different country, but here’s my personal experience.

https://www.hs.fi/suomi/art-2000009654524.html

In Finland. And no-one fucking believes me here. Despite having supreme court documents to show. And that’s only a part of the illegal shit I got them on, as they forcibly prevented me fron filming.

I’d say nice try, but it isn’t.

I keep making the same point. You can’t let go and stop replying out of like… spite, or something?

Nothing to it. I’m not trying to insult you, but guess you are me.

Good, some doubt. Now apply that towards the justice system.

With people I might have made feel stupid? It is rare, yeah, but on occasion. Shows a lot of character when it happens, though.

And you must be on really shaky grounds with any sort of an argument, meaning you probably have literally zero experience with the justice system. Bringing me back to how cops being able to get away with things they do in your house and you noticing them in your house aren’t mutually exclusive. (In this sentence, the preposition isn’t needed. But in the first one, the way it was formatted, it did call for a preposition. See example 3: “Time and Tru Midi Slip Skirt Comfort and style are definitely not mutually exclusive with this midi skirt.”)

I literally laughed out loud. Well, not too audibly, but still. Forcibly exhaled, let’s say.

they cannot get in and out of my house unnoticed.

This is very much not mutually exclusive with “getting away with things”.

You’re too optimistic about the justice system.

Amateurs.

It was the late nineties and info on such matters freely flowed on the net.

As opposed to?