

What about being sexually abused by an older family member makes it a better punchline?
What about being sexually abused by an older family member makes it a better punchline?
The only asari I’ll ever truly accept is Dr. Liara T’soni, my OTL.
The ‘plap plap GET PREGNANT’ meme, but with a therapist shouting:
h’whut with h’whomb?
What??
We could build that in. Glue on some googly eyes too.
69,421.5
Edit: Please update when you’re fully dead, OP, so I can finalize the new count.
What didn’t the dragon say?
Everyone still on Twitter
This does sound like a Marvel mutant? I think his name was “Furnace”? He had no jaw and his chest was flaming energy?
Edit: That was not his name:
Jono Starsmore, also known as Chamber, is a mutant who possesses mutant abilities including the generation and manipulation of concussive blasts of psionic energy from a furnace in his chest, telepathy for communication and mental manipulation.
Ah yeah, of course not. Who would live in a hellscape where having an apartment to yourself is a fantasy?
Ay, you live in Boston too?
You…
What’s your stance on tiny tomatoes?
Magic is cool. But don’t pick the one used primarily by evil if you don’t want to be judged.
Like, you can thunk the rugged military aesthetic of WW2 is a vibe but if you only collect Nazi uniforms, you’re gonna be that guy.
Once again, we have lawmakers just making spurious if not outright false statements with no repercussions. When your words decide people’s reality, you should be afraid of what you say. And I don’t see that fear in legislators.
They just say whatever the fuck incorrect bullshit they wish, and walk it back at their leisure when the effect is already resolved in throughout news media. The world’s gotten their soundclip, the base started foaming when they heard their whistles, and then the politican quietly amends “oh, I obviously didn’t mean that.” If more politicans shut the fuck up because they were scared of the repercussions of walking their statements back, then maybe there’d be more reporting on what they’ve done then the inflammatorily idiotic shit they spew every other day.
"I am not resisting arrest. I am merely standing inside my home to be arrested. Why would I step outside to be arrested?
Idk hown I’m supposed to hit this, nor with what.
So when is the government going to deliver my local squadron of tick-squashing gorillas?
A risk lay in the fact that users with sufficient power could choose what to show and what to conceal to other stones: in The Lord of the Rings, a palantír has fallen into the Enemy’s hands, making the usefulness of all other existing stones questionable.
They aren’t just “unreliable”. They are consistently described as a tool that it is misguided to use or trust because of how suspectible it is to being manipulated and how readily it, in turn, poisons the user. If a user isn’t wary, their world-view – when informed through the palantír – will be malformed through projected half-truths and misdirections.
Even if the “concept” of a palantír is neutral (saying nothing about a magical device that enables imperceptible surveillance), it is an astounding failure of literary analysis to not get why Tolkien included them as they are – with their consistent, negative representation – in his books.
The You in U-310 was forced to bear witness to an extinction event. Their psyche will not recover, despite the univ-phasic trauma ripple.
That doesn’t answer anyone’s question.