If you’re fine with dipping your toes into eugenics, then have fun.

Either scrambled or sunny side up. Butter, salt, and black pepper. Occasionally paprika.

I’d say that is a US-centric concern (and media that expects the US market), maybe even more broadly a Western concern. Japan at least, uh, has not had much of a concern with sexifying…pretty much anything.

Yes.

And you don’t lose all of it, if you’re particularly well-endowed.

My issue with “porn in nonporn” is it almost always feels objectifying. Like the gooner Supergirl in the OP image: if her character liked the look of a battlethong and owned it, then that’s fine. It might even factor into the story. But if she just looks like that and acts like things are normal, then it’s like she is being sexed up solely for some nondiegetic viewer. It gives me the same sort of voyeuristic ick as invisible people peeping in locker rooms or perverts abusing X-Ray glasses.

I don’t mind Skinemax; like softcore porn is fine. Because everyone understands the assignment.

Watch the bearded guy just to her right attempt to eat that loaded hotdog.

Wow, lookit this braggart! Satisfied with their life and not passively wishing to disappear.

No it doesn’t? The apple doesn’t check if you’re a man before de-dickandballs-ing you. It’ll uproot the twig and berries whether you’re cis, trans, or intersex.

It’s expunging 15g of crotchmeat no matter what you do or don’t have, so buckle up.

This is my exact stance. I want my porn separate from my non-porn.

People that just have badonkulous jiggle physics blasting while they play a normal game baffle me.

I’m curious what you read out of my comment.

Because, to disassemble the prose, my comment equates “health” and “wealth” so that the following desire to “make oligarchs less wealthy” would naturally equate to “make oligarchs less healthy.” The implication being exacting some amount of violence on oligarchs.

Or maybe they didn’t know what the original said?

The sexual signage is a weird move when paired with someone else’s likeness, but people in here are acting like template images don’t exist. And images haven’t existed outside of the contextual meme they started in.

People can’t just call out the offbase meme. No, this was a deliberate plot to sexualize and marginalize this lady’s original message.

Absolutely insane play to claim the OP of the thread calling out OP is clearly trying to distract from their own point.

Revealed that they’re lashing out reflexively and are too immature to accept when they’re wrong.

Same here. Pretty normal dimensions: between 1" and 12" depending on temp and the like

Assailants can’t get one over on me: I’m properly stabilized.

Just solid like a rock.

“Health is wealth.”

And we’re trying to make oligarchs much less wealthy.

Why does this seem…wrong? Like the scale is bad. Like she’s scaled down to 0.9 and he’s scaled up to 1.1 but a normal person is 1.0.

I understand the concept of “height differences”, but this hits weird. Maybe I’m just tired.

Why is that insane? We have culinary theory now, but before?

It’s dead, made of meat-food, and you have a group to feed.

Believe or not, that’s still a “disappearing.”

Might even be a double disappearing.

Then we’ll work with the admission board to see if we can’t get you into “obsessed with work” on a “degeneracy” path.