

Who says human traffickers have to be dumb?
Who says human traffickers have to be dumb?
I wouldn’t say there aren’t people who are naturally more flexible than average but all the people who are VERY flexible worked for it. The processes that improve your ligaments and muscles in that way require repetition and dedication like any other self improvement.
They’re already monarchists
It’s Ukraine’s position?
Elon is literally a Nazi. “Israel controls America” is a completely expected position from him, especially now that he can play victim of the state.
With a different angle we could have had a fasces over their heads.
Oh wow you know so much about this topic and everything else!
Said it above, but get a clue:
I mean, they made the Asian girl the yellow ranger, the “Native American” (not sure if the actor actually is but the character was) the Red Ranger, the black guy the Black Ranger, with Basic White People as gender-defaults Pink and Blue.
The White Power Ranger might be innocent but the producers knew what they were doing. He’s even more powerful than the others put together.
I mean, they made the Asian girl the yellow ranger, the “Native American” (not sure if the actor actually is but the character was) the Red Ranger, the black guy the Black Ranger, with Basic White People as gender-defaults Pink and Blue.
The White Power Ranger might be innocent but the producers knew what they were doing. He’s even more powerful than the others put together…
Does make you stand out from the crowd if you’re not that though
OkCupid is a dead/dying site. It sounds like you specifically got off it just as it started its decline.
It’s probably not any worse than Tinder though. On account of match.com buying both…
That’s what a fed would say! And someone that’s not a fed would say!
She’s probably real in the novel as well, but I don’t think you can definitively say it’s an impossible interpretation in either.
It’s a bit more clear in the novel for a few reasons but you can still wave away a lot of the points against it simply by pointing to how extremely unreliable the Narrator is.
Sometimes it be like that too
Pretty obvious if you’re used any recently but confirmation is nice. Their closed captions are generally pretty terrible as well.
Yeah this plan seems impractical and out of touch
I have no problem believing that every society has ludicrous cultural vestiges that can undoubtedly be traced back to a religious practice. For example, some Pope might declare that fish isn’t meat based on an example of linguistic sophistry to protect the fishing industry.
That’s because you had a bad take that illogically separates the biological demands of organisms and their communities from aspects of social organization
There is no separation, social behaviors are also adaptations to the environment.
Not hitting dumdums on the head with a hammer whenever they say something silly is a social construct.
Hitting dumdums on the head with a hammer when they do could also be a social construct.
The usefulness of either method might be disputed by some but that there is practical social and individual value in not being murdered for a bad take should be obvious.
The criticism of “that’s just a social construct” is not that it is one and is therefore meaningless, but that being a construct means it could be flawed.
I’ll be a frog so I don’t