Well, to be fair, not having a proper appreciation for terroir is just barbaric for a French person.
Exactly.
People behaving as "consumers" supports the current system and hence supports the harmful side effects of such system, from the systemic suffering from wealth inequality to ecological destruction.
Whilst very few of us, living within this system, can in practice stop living within the system, we can refrain from living in accordance with the rules of the system which are not imposed on us via removing all other choices or force, but which we are "nudged" or manipulated to follow using marketing or even propaganda, and pretty much everything which is "impulse" or "deriving a momentary pleasure from buying" are the latter kind of thing.
Re-read what I wrote - being black is nowhere as correlated with suffering systemic abuses from wealth inequality as is being poor or working class, more so for gender as per your own numbers: women earning in average 80% of what men earn is far less unequal than the average worker earning less than 0.3% of what a CEO earns (and way less than that when compared to a billionaire).
There is no inherent poverty in being black or a woman, there's only that which has been placed there by people who - like Reagan - when they look at other human beings don't see people, they see ethnicity or gender, and by following a logic that expects afro-americans or women to all be "something" and "having an obligation to behave in certain way" purely because of their race or gender, you're following THE EXACT SAME MENTAL ARCHITECTURE as the racists and sexists like Reagan of classifying people based on genetics and then having expectations on them and determining what they deserve based on that.
(Emphasys and big caps because that's the part that really pisses me off)
Fighting inequality by using the very same proxies of worth and deserving as the Far-Right is validating and prolonging the very fundations of Far-Right thinking that say that people should be treated first and foremost based on race and gender. Those who do so, whether they think that they're leftwing or not, are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
It's thus not surprising that this kind of thinking is most widespread in Neoliberal countries whose Overtoon Window is way to the right of most countries - you don't shift politics to the Left by limiting yourself to the perspective on other human being of the Fascists.
You fight the suffering of systemic abuses by punishing and stopping the abusers and helping the ACTUAL victims, not by accepting the reductive and prejudicial proxies of the abusers themselves and shaping your thinking on the subject and fighting around those - that's just willfully playing by the rules of the Fascists.
PS: But don't trust me, just look at the actual results - Identity Politics has been way worse than things like Social Democracy or even Unionism in reducing the systemic abuses its supporters claim to want to address. In fact in the countries and period were Identity Politics dominated left-of-center (relative to the local Overtoon Window) politics, the suffering due to systemic abuses has actually worsened when compared to periods and places were Social-Democracy or even just Unionism were more dominant.
So best change your investment strategy, then.
If people persist in riding this bubble out of greed, it's only fair if they get burned when it blows up.
Agreed.
One single potentially good thing in the middle of bad things still adds to something bad.
My point is that this shit is happening either way no matter how shit it all is, so if we can recognize and extract one good thing out of it at least on the other side we'll have one good thing, whilst if we don't, we'll have nothing good at all.
Well, duh!
Digital Sovereignty make industrial espionage much harder, plus it reduces the profits of the massive companies which grew in the previous Tech evolution wave, which are mainly in the US.
The silver lining in all this is that when this bubble explodes we'll probably have a glut in the supply of HDDs and SSDs, driving prices down.
Just hold any plans to upgrade your hardware for a year or two and you'll end up better of (for many it will even be a good exercise to wean oneself out of the mindless "instant gratification" impulses one is indoctrinated into by Consumer Society).
I, for one, applaud anything that helps destroy the current Intellectual Property system.
Not the other things, though.
I suspect that to some level this reflects how varied one's path through life has been.
Certainly my own varied collection of mugs and cups is mainly the product of having lived in many different places and having picked new mugs up along the way. Also I'll keep old mugs around even after they're chipped because they're associated with my memories of places I lived in before.
That said, maybe a varied life and a hodge-podge collection of mugs are correlated and have a common cause, rather than having a causal relation - it makes sense that the kind of people comfortable with moving to places were they don't know anybody (and even with different cultures, if they change countries) would also be comfortable with a less than perfect collection of cups and mugs.
Access to entry level positions is pretty fucked up in this because whilst experts will recognized expertise, for anything but smaller companies candidates get filtered out by HR and those people have no fucking clue what expertise outside their domain looks like, so they use proxies for it such as "stamp of approval from higher education institution" so in big companies the candidates without such stamps of approval (or a pre-existing insider contact) never actually get to be evaluated by the domain experts who can recognize that expertise.
That said, if a candidate doesn't have at least some domain expertise (so, neither formal study nor having done anything in that area in their free time), sorry but somebody who has actually had the discipline to attend a learning institution and enough capability and domain knowledge to actually pass their exams and graduate, is way more likely to be at least decent at it (no guarantee, but the odds are much better) than a random person who never did either. It's only fair that if you haven't invested in learning it in some way or other (not necessarily college) you're not going be seen at the same level as somebody who has actually invested in learning that domain.
It's only naturally that some kind of expertise validation system for candidates emerges for any kind of domain were some level of expertise is required and as things stand now in most such domains at the entry level that's colleges (which, IMHO, are better than cronyism-heavy "know somebody who knows somebody" systems), though in many domains something lighter and cheaper (some kind of cheaper test-only option) would probably be better (or, alternativelly, do as it's done in civilized countries and have higher education be Public, thus cheaper or even free).
Also having attended college and actually successfully passed its knowledge tests and graduated proves that you have both the discipline and mental capability for certain jobs.
I'm in software development and have been part of the process of hiring people and from the point of view of an employer, for a candidate to an entry level position that college diploma is an indicator that the person in question has the knowledge and capabilities to do that kind of job.
Mind you, in my area fortunatelly there are other ways to indicate that - for example, having participated in Open Source projects or, even better, having your own Open Source project with actual users that you've had to support (which in my view can put somebody above somebody else who merelly has a college diploma) - though that's generally only for smaller companies since large ones will have HR filter candidates before the ever reach the actual domain experts and HR can't judge skill like that and instead will go for "formal stamp of approval" shit such as college diplomas.
That said, the college diploma stops being important after junior level, unless it's one from a handful of very prestigious institutions and even then it won't work on domain experts, only non-expert manager types - if a company is hiring people for mid and above expertise levels based on which college they've attended, that place is going to be a political shithole of incompetence better avoided by those who aren't skilled at or interested in progressing their career through social games.
as an individual who has undoubtedly been subject to those systemic abuses
Bullshit!
Plenty of black women are part of the Owner Class, plenty of white men are part of the Working Class - what's almost perfectly correlated with being subject the systemic abuses of class is "Wealth". Race (even in the US, which is extra fucked up) is only somewhat positivelly correlated and gender is barelly so (the difference in average incomes between rich and poor is literally thousands of times greater than the difference in average incomes between men and women).
There is no reason to pull out "identitarian markers" when talking about class inequality unless one has been indoctrinated in a Neoliberal "divide and conquer" fake-Leftist political ideology designed to divide the fight for Equality For All into a hierarchy of "differently deserving of having Equality" based on things people wore born with rather than on Need, a view of others and how deserving they are that mirrors the way the Far-Right sees the world.
Not being filthy rich and having to slog in the mud like the rest of us to just keep one's head above the surface is infinitelly more correlated to not being in the Owner Class than one's count of X chromossomes in pair 23 or one's gene for melanine production.
It really pisses me off how people from some political cultures with very right-shifted Overtoon Windows, even whilst they have the best of intentions, have been brainwashed into classifying their fellow human beings and having expectations on them (i.e. Prejudices) using the very same architecture of thinking as the Far-Right, to the point that even when they talk about "class inequality" their mind sees "identitarian markers" (just like the Fascists) rather than "Working Class" which is from where the actual expression "class inequality" originates from.
She's not a class traitor because she's black or because she's a woman, she's a class traitor because she works for a living and is cooperating in suppressing news about the problems caused by the Owner Class.
That's just the coding part of the work, which for a modern AAA game (and pretty much all 3D indie games) is the smallest part of the work - modelling, texturing and level design easilly exceed that, and whilst those are the biggest ones, there's quite a lot more non-coding work, from graphics design to audio engineering.
IMHO modern tools and frameworks have reduced the work that needs to be done in the coding space more than they did in other areas.
Also, in gamedev there's the exact same problem you see in non-game-related software development: as the tools, libraries and frameworks get better and let devs do more in the same amount of time, the expectations on the capabilities of the software grow, eating up all those gains and more - nowadays you can't get away with a bunch of lines defining walls on a flat grid space and a handful of sprites with just 2 animation frames each like in Pacman.
Same here.
The whole things has a massive "grift" vibe, especially given that they're double dipping since supporters of their "Game preservation efforts" still have to pay for those games.
Happy to keep on buying games from them in preference to from Steam, some even from the "Good old game" bucket, just not willing to assume a monthly monetary commitment to some black-box "trust us" which feels a lot like the "Charity as a business" shit from the most sleazy "charities" out there (you know the kind: the ones with CEOs paid massive salaries and were only a small fraction of contributions actually ends up in the charitable objective).
Wasn't that just in the UK?
That's some serious envious Loser energy!
It's not only misogyny.
Social media absolutely removes the inhibitions of just about all kinds of assholes, builds pat-each-other-on-the-back support groups for them by putting them together with like minded assholes and then algorithmically shovels all that shit on everybody else because anything that elicits strong emotions means more clicks and anger from being offended is one such emotion.
By the way, this also applies to unhealthy gender expectations on males (including misandry), though this being The Guardian I expect this is about the UK, which IMHO (having lived there and also elsewhere in Europe) is a country with serious problems when it comes to gender expectations around women and insidious "benevolent" sexism ("benevolent" not because it's good but because it follows the whole "women are fragile creatures" and subsequent subtle disemplowering of women "to protect them" or because "they're emotional creatures") which far too often taints the articles in The Guardian because they're very much from the British upper-middle class Acceptable Feminism, which tends to underestimate the strength of women and favor "protection" "solutions" over empowerment and agency.
So whilst I absolutely believe in all of this and in misogyny online being very bad, especially in certain countries, the choice of focusing on misogyny rather than as a whole in the problem of social media's Profit Driven amplification of societal dysfunctions in general, is very much a typical privileged British Upper Middle Class "Third Wave Feminist" perspective and choice.
Ye Power Trippin' Bastards @lemmy.dbzer0.com Lemmy world moderation as usual using "anti-semitism" as a cudgel against Humanitarian beliefs.
Sounds like the police in Britain has automated arresting people for the "crime" of walking on the street whilst not looking white enough.
Reference material