• IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

    They had the presidency and did nothing.

    But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Of course.

      Can’t do anything, but gotta look like you’re doing something so they can use it for fodder in the next election

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is just so some Democrats can claim “supported/worked for higher worker wages” during their next reelection campaign.

  • Tolc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Imagine begging for crumbs of your own labour from the bourgeosie imperialist democratic party

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that’s adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn’t be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

      But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

    We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      most of them are gop that are not electable as a republican, so they become DINOS. schumer +13 other senators are likely the same, likewise with the house seats.

    • amgine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not just that but if it passed it would eat into profits. We can’t have that, think of the shareholders

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Profits are already eaten up by executive bonuses and salaries.

        It’s regular salaries that eat into those, and that’s what they’re trying to protect.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can’t earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn’t matter the amount the wage is, if it isn’t also tied to inflation as we’ll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn’t. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it’s not just theater.

    Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

    • jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      there will never be a wage cap under this current neoliberal hellscape. the entire goal of both parties is to make money for their corporate interests

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s where the cap needs to be. There will always be someone capable and willing to take the job without the enormous pay packet. Executive pay is the biggest scam ever created.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No but you see if we don’t offer 2 million a year AT LEAST we won’t attract too talent!

          • immutable@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s such a wild lie that for some reason we are all supposed to take seriously.

            We all work at companies, the executives aren’t doing anything earth shattering. Most executives seem to be running the playbook of “give the customer less and charge them more to increase profits”. Wow, what innovation!

            I would love for someone to be able to point out some concrete brilliant ideas that an executive actually had that went from “vague bullshit” to execution without getting worked and reworked and reworked by a bunch of normal employees until it was actually viable.

            Steve Jobs made the iPhone, oh by himself, did he design the chips and write the software? Sure the vision is great, but for every iPhone there are a thousand CEOs that basically keep the lights on an already functioning company and raise the price. Oversee a rebrand. Go on the news and talk up their company.

            And they’d have you believe that that’s worth 300-400x what a regular employee.

            That every day they are coming in and providing more benefit than a worker does in an entire year. It’s the most obvious bullshit we’ve ever been asked to swallow

    • aaa999@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the “the 1%” meme is really anti-class consciousness, rich workers are workers, this individual literally forgot investors exist

  • menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Dozen of workplace burn by the workers -> even shithead thinks to raise wages

    Direct action pay cash

  • atoro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t wait for this to not go anywhere and have several dems finger-wag for the next several years saying there’s nothing they can do

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they’re not in power.

    When they’re in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema’s thumbs down.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you really think that wages are low because higher wages would make the businesses fail? Wages are low because businesses have no incentive to raise them in an employer’s market, that’s it. They make higher margins and keep the difference.

          • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Both cases are possible. Wages may be low because of surplus of working force on the market (hence no incentives to rise wages) or can be result of extremely low margins at the given industry.

            There can be tens of reasons why wages are poor, and rising minimum pay solves the issue only in some cases

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              Of course, there will be edge cases of industries that have not improved their margins over the years. But the fact that prices follow inflation, and wages do not, is enough information to generalise that businesses are just greedy as fuck.

        • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Most of the past history of raising minimum wage/payroll taxes/employee benefits has been immediate outcry by business groups over how all business is going to go bankrupt/the sky is falling followed by change that a year later has business chugging along mostly the same as it was prior to their catastrophizing. It’s not really surprising that employees who are able to spend more, spend more.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This may be for show but that’s more show than they were willing to show 2019-2021. Republicans were throwing out certain to fail bills constantly for at least the last 25 years. It at least throws people a marketing bone and also any that make it out of committee to a floor vote, it puts on record/something to market for/against an elected public servant. Republicans effectively steer public opinion against their own to their advantage for getting stuff passed and who they want into office. Democrats do not.

    It’s one way to craft a publicly recognizable party ideology that the democratic party has failed to build up these last few decades. The we’re not republicans, we looks and sound more professional doesn’t work. Something like this is a major improvement. If it makes it to the floor for a vote, which democrats and republicans will vote against or abstain. We should want that for potential future primary challengers and be encouraging these

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No it is not. Democrats did plenty of performative theater in the past. They even have a rotating villain cast which will always make sure there are just enough Democrat votes “betraying” the party to make Republican legislation pass.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      its performative, the gop isnt on board with this and likely they will block it. dnc has alot of bad publicity recently, israel/gaza, inaction trump, plus ending shut downs early,etc.

      THE gop has largely convinced thier own base that higher wages =higher prices.

      they get more good publicity by raising the MEDICAID/care income cap, where you have a max income on which you can receive " recieve free healthcare" or reapplying the covid-area susidies to the ACA.