• DdCno1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    There’s a new application-layer Internet protocol like (but also very much unlike) http by the name of Gemini. It was first launched in 2019 and until yesterday, flew completely under my radar. It’s primarily meant to be used for uncluttered text-only pages (although any type of file can be distributed), which are created using a deliberately simple and limited markdown language. Unsurprisingly, this results in a plethora of small niche blogs being published through it.

    The basic user experience is essentially the same as browsing the web, until you notice just how much it isn’t. You enter URLs (except that they start with gemini://) you read texts and you click on hyperlinks - except that every page looks exactly the same due to the markdown language. There are no pop-ups, no ads, nothing autoplays, nothing wants your consent to exploit your user data. Even images only load when the user clicks on them. It shows just how little is actually needed, how many aspects of the modern web are completely unnecessary and mere pointless distractions.

    Gemini pages - and this is a small hurdle that will keep most people away from it - can not be accessed with a normal web browser and instead require a specialized client for viewing (although paradoxically, creating pages often requires a web browser, at least for now). The idea is that both the underlying tech and the browsers are much more straightforward than anything related to http and html. A Gemini client is not effectively an entire operating system of its own that can execute near arbitrary code. It displays formatted text with basic images and videos - that’s it.

    Here’s a neat, but slightly outdated introduction that also recommends a few clients and where to find pages to read:

    https://geminiquickst.art/

    The entire thing feels very early, tiny, experimental and odd, almost like a parallel reality, as if the World Wide Web didn’t exist and someone came up with something like it only now, using today’s hard- and software. If Lemmy is a response to social media in general and reddit in particular, Gemini feels more like a response to the World Wide Web as a whole or like a time machine back to a highly idealized version of the early days of the information system (the primary difference being the lack of horrendous '90s UX design and malware everywhere), including some unfortunate aspects that I had long forgotten about, like how the common method of finding content next to feeds - manually updated indexes instead of search engines - is plagued by dead links; and these dead links, unlike on the normal Internet, cannot be attempted to be resolved using the Wayback Machine or some other cache, at least not yet.

    Gemini is equally parts exciting and promising, like a new frontier, but also at times confusing and frustrating. Don’t expect your Gemini client of choice to replace your web browser any time soon (or ever), but it’s still worth trying out, if for the novelty alone.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was initially interested in the idea of Gemini, but when looking for a client, I happened upon this blog post by the creator of one of the clients about why they were abandoning it.

      After a lot of thinking, I’ve realized there is one main reason I don’t keep coming back to Gemini: it offers no advantage over how I already use the Web.

      In practice, the Web already has all the Gemini content I’m interested in from various people, and then of course everything else. Having everything in one place (whether my web browser or feed reader) makes for a much nicer experience.

      Gemini is a reaction to bloated modern websites, but in fact I don’t actually visit that many gross websites like that. When I do, my ad blocker and paywall bypasser usually make them decent again. Otherwise, I spend the majority of my non-work Internet time on lightweight sites like my feed reader and Hacker News, and some time on sites that Gemini can’t emulate: YouTube, Reddit, Discord. The reality is that Gemini just wouldn’t actually improve this experience for me.

      These are exactly the reservations I had about the concept, so to have someone so invested in it reach this exact conclusion and leave it made me decide to forego it. I think it’s a neat toy, and if it becomes relevant I’ll definitely take another look, but I think it’s a bit of putting the cart before the horse. I don’t want to use a protocol for the sake of using a protocol, I want it to serve a purpose and solve an actual problem I have.

      • currawong@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I enjoyed browsing Gemini capsules using the Lagrange browser. Its look and feel is awesome and made me want to write smol websites again. I’m appalled by what modern websites have become. I miss making light but cool sites without an ounce of scripts in them.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not familiar with the Gemini protocol, but how does it differ from just starting up a webserver pointed at a single folder with an index.html? Isn’t it still just as possible to make a simple site using http?

      • krash@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gemini is encrypted by default, but they both share a lot of similarities.

      • DdCno1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Similar idea, but entirely new. I don’t think many people even here know what Gopher is.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I used Gopher a bit, but we were just looking for free games, and usually ended up on a big college FTP server.

            Then Netscape changed it all.

            Eventually Hotline came along and was our favorite way to get warez.

          • DdCno1@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I considered mentioning it, but I’ve been accused of being far older than I am, simply because I know about things from the past, so I skipped it.

        • Trollivier@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I remember seeing it mentioned here and there in 96, 97 when I first got access to internet. I was never curious enough to dig further. I just know it’s another protocol…

    • Hjalmar@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have seen Gemini before but never tried it. Maybe i will but i do have a few questions first:

      • Is there a Gemini search engine?
      • Is there support for Forms/server side code
      • How big is it? Is there like just a few sites or a few hundred?
      • DdCno1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is there a Gemini search engine?

        I’ve found this one:

        gemini://geminispace.info/

        Needs a client to access, of course. Basic, but functional. I found a general-purpose forum not too different from reddit or lemmy through it (and they decided to call it a BBS, because the Eternal September hasn’t happened to Gemini yet):

        gemini://bbs.geminispace.org/

        Is there support for Forms/server side code

        To the best of my understanding (and it’s highly limited, since I only just learned about this, so take everything with a grain of salt), what Gemini does is primarily limit what the client can do. No local scripts, highly limited markdown. The server side is not limited. You can write any complex code you want that works behind the scenes - but it still has to deliver static pages (called “capsules”) to the end user. This series of articles explains the basic underlying tech and uses the example of a simple server to illustrate how Gemini works:

        https://medium.com/erus-encodia/creating-your-own-gemini-server-part-1-what-is-the-gemini-protocol-cf497477c4d

        And yes, forms are possible, even though there appears to be a somewhat widespread misconception that they are impossible. Please excuse the sketchy-looking IP address instead of a URL, this was the best resource I was able to find on this (and yes, I checked if this page is on Gemini - this appears to be not the case):

        http://216.218.220.144/tutorials/sig-tutorials/misc/gemini-forms.gmi

        Screenshot if you don’t want to click on the above link: https://i.imgur.com/s2mL3bM.png

        Disclaimer: This is two years old and I have not tried to implement it myself. Looks entirely plausible though.

        How big is it? Is there like just a few sites or a few hundred?

        According to the search engine linked above, there are 2420 domains and 1,854,666 individual pages as of yesterday. This is about comparable to the World Wide Web at the same time 1994, a number that grew to 10,000 by the end of that year; I wouldn’t expect the same explosive growth from Gemini - the field has already been plowed, after all. Gemini Space is small, but not a ghost town.

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          And the star system and sign. Naming projects after very common words (or even worse, just letters or numbers) is really stupid as it makes searching for them or discussing them difficult and context sensitive and prone to fail.

    • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thank you so much for sharing this. I literally cannot stand the modern net. I’ve made it a point to curate personal websites. Found a bunch of cool ones on the lainchan web ring. Will check out Gemini

    • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s cool and all, but this feels more like a toy than a tool. I can make dead simple web site in minutes with current stack. Nothing, but plain static pages.

      Heck, if I looked for it, I bet I could set up markdown to HTML converter as this is already a widely used functionality throughout the web.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Couldn’t they just use No JavaScript and get the same approach? Or no JavaScript and no CSS?

      I am 100% down for that approach. We even have options now so the entire web doesn’t have to be a fucking Table element.

      Why do we need a whole new standard? That’s never a good approach

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They were teaching HTML in Primary Schools and then again in Middle Schools. I have a hard time believing it’s easier.

          It’s not even standard Markdown. Because again - why use a standard when I can make my own???

          • anothermember@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Admittedly I’ve only just found out about this today, but my understanding is that it’s meant to be going back to basics since modern web design is so far removed from the original intentions of HTML.

          • Interstellar_1@pawb.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m probably too young for that- I didn’t learn HTML in school, all the programming curriculum was in Scratch or Microsoft Makecode, and I assume it still is.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d love to host my personal site over Gemini but that site doesn’t have any details about self-hosting. Guess I’ve got to research it in more detail. Do you have any recommendations? Should I just write my own server? 🤔

    • tobiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s like html when it started out. The idea was that the user got to choose what all pages would look like. That gave way to the author having total control.

  • Interstellar_1@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Ferrero (the company that owns Kinder, Nutella and Ferrero Rocher) controlled one quarter of the global production of hazelnuts in 2014.

    (Edited to remove some unintentionally deceptive language)

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s way too much for one company. Is it just me or does the world just keep making more and more monopolies?

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s just deceivingly worded. It’s not like they took that much out of the total supply, taking away from others that would have needed it. Reality is that hazelnut farmers were farming them in order to sell them to Ferrero.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess that makes somewhat sense. But it still gives Ferrero too big of an influence on the price of hazelnuts I would guess

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or we just don’t actually have that many hazelnuts. Or Ferrero just makes some really yummy stuff and hence it’s bought in insane amounts.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          If its such a lucrative business for Ferrero, how come there aren’t competitors enough to make it so they can’t hog 25%?

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            80% goes to the EU confectionery industry, according to what I could quickly Google. So 65% go to Ferrero like companies that aren’t Ferrero.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            American candy manufacturing mostly uses peanuts and/or almonds instead, so they compete but not for filberts/hazelnuts.

            I will also contend that they’re not that good a nut on their own, they need chocolate to achieve their true destiny.

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              I have to downvote you on the hazelnuts not being very good. They’re one of my favorite nuts, and they look cool!

              • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                To me they look like chickpeas wearing windbreakers, and I prefer pecans. But you are welcome to your own preferences, enjoy! I do think hazelnuts are the very best nut with chocolate, even over pecans.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I find it hard to believe young guys still plan any aspects of their lives around watching sports events.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not everyone lives in a busling city with lots to do. For some, sport is one of not many outlets, so it becomes almost like a religion

        • oxjox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ummm… as someone who lives in Philadelphia, I can inform you that young men who live in and around this bustling city have adopted sports as their primary religion.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Fair enough. I some times am jealous of people who like following sports. Hanging in a bar watching the sports game and getting drunk sounds fun. I just don’t find it fun.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can hang, drink tea and knit if that’s what you like. But it is easy to understand why people get tribal for their sport’s favorite team.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t know about bars for it, but I do know people who have shows they watch together with a large group of friends, and alcohol can easily be involved there. Works especially well for trash reality TV. The people I first learnt about this practice from watch the Bachelor.

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Traffic (the book) says most Americans merge into traffic wrong when lanes reduce (from say 3 lanes to 2 lanes for example.)

    The right way is waiting until you are at the very end of the lane that’s reducing. When that happens up to 60% more cars per hour get through the bottle neck in heavy traffic and accidents resulting in killed or serious injury are reduced by up to 80%.

    Bottom line having multiple entry points in a queue with multiple slow down points due to the multiple entry points is the cause of the reduced performance with the way most Americans do it.

    • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But, if I merge as soon as there’s space for me I don’t have to stress and panic about not having room to get into the other lane or keep driving forward. What do you do if you get to the end of the lane and people aren’t letting you in?