If course not, “everyone” refers to people, not things.

So what would you have them do instead?

It’s warm, partially enclosed, and smells like you.

You are not entitled to get things the way you want them.

“You want to purchase something and use it the way you want to? How entitled can you get?”

How DARE you suggest things should be better for me, the consumer, instead of the way our corporate overlords feel is more profitable!

Well, that’s certainly an… Interesting take on someone saying things should be better…

Right, and a picture of a woman is not a woman, it’s a picture.

You’ll find that pictures of women get blurred more often than actual women.

Drawings and sculptures are often censored.

So they’ll censor the nipples on a drawing of sculpture of a woman?

That still indicates that a woman is being depicted, just like in this picture.

This is my personal machine that I own, there is no reason for my operating system to “hide” options from me. If I want to never update my system or delete core operating files that’s my fucking problem to deal with.

You know what else windows hides from normal users? How to disable information tracking, ads, and this AI bullshit.

When you pull out “software I didn’t start for six months wants to update”

Did the software “want” to update or “force” an update? There’s a meaningful difference there and windows often doesn’t give you a choice or do anything else while it’s updating.

If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else

I’m not, but if we look back to the top of this comment chain, we see someone complaining that the comments won’t be about the comic but instead about how shitty a person the artist is for some reason.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:

I fail to understand why posting a pair of tits is such a controversial thing to do. Maybe I’m too European to lose my marbles over some nipples.

So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial and the artist being a shitty person.

If you are in fact over here just “trying to talk about Internet security” then it sounds like you’ve taken a bizarre tangent from the topic at hand in order to circle jerk about your topic of choice.

not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.

Sure. But that sounds like her problem, not a reason for me to dislike her.

This sounds a lot like “there are duchbags attacking her because they are misogynists” which again, is not a good reason for other people to dislike her.

Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.

She doesn’t practice OPSEC because she has an OF that exists? I am not nearly as aware of her OF as the people that don’t like her, so you’ll have to let me know if there’s something different she should be doing with it.

to determine whether friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence

I must be really out of the loop. What is her business that results in her having enemy intelligence? Is it being on OF that gets you enemy intelligence, or making comics?

Lots of posts on Lemmy are bland and unimaginative. I don’t feel the need to comment as such in each and every one of them.

I thought she was just “bland and unimaginative”

She has children so she has to be a paragon of virtue?

I only hear about her onlyfans from people who don’t like her because she has an onlyfans. You advertise more than she does.

turned the relevant subreddit into basically /r/ChurchofPizzacake…

1. I’m not on Reddit, I don’t care what the subreddit is like.

2. fans of [thing] are on the subreddit of [thing] saying how much they like [thing]?! I guess I should hate everything then!

Your grasping at straws here man.

Rages at reality for doing the thing everyone said would happen?

Removed by mod

would rather watch it die so it can be replaced with real jobs that people can live off of

A faster way to do that: minimum wage laws that require people are paid a wage they can live off of.

The’ve tried the whole “let’s not pass laws to increase minimum wage, people will just not take jobs that don’t pay enough” for decades. Jobs still exist that pay below poverty (minimum wage).

If we agree that what they are doing is garbage and shouldn’t be able to exist, why are they arguing against doing something that would prevent it from existing?