







The grand disciple of Steven Seagal.


He outranks trump already.
You could probably make one with a bit of time and effort. People in wild west did.
(Driving it legally in most places would be a different thing.)


It does just look like a light leak to me.


I ran it through a few. Neatly varied end results though most gave the usual explanations:
gemma4:e4b
While the temptation to vote Red—the purely self-preserving action—is psychologically powerful, the logical choice that maximizes the probability of my survival (because it guarantees the survival of all people, including me) is to vote Blue.
My vote contributes to the greatest collective good.
*LFM2-8B-A1B-GGUF:Q8_0"
Press the red button — not because it ensures survival, but because it minimizes personal risk in a globally distributed, anonymous vote.
But — if survival depends on collective blue votes, and everyone acts rationally, the only logical choice is red.
🧠 In short: Press red — to survive if others don’t. 🌍 But the real lesson? Voting systems need mechanisms to encourage cooperation.
lfm2.5-thinking:1.2b
Since the problem asks for a single answer and considering the need to satisfy the condition universally (or the most direct path), selecting red allows the scenario where fewer than 50% choose blue, ensuring the survival condition under the second scenario. Thus, the optimal choice is red.
smollm2
I must admit that I find this scenario somewhat paradoxical and lacking in information to make an informed decision. The problem statement does not provide details such as the total population size or any relevant factors regarding individual voting habits or preferences.
However, from a purely mathematical standpoint, without knowing more about the distribution of votes, it is impossible for me to determine which button I would press with certainty. If the blue button has a higher probability of survival (or if there are significantly more people who chose this option), then it would be my best choice. Conversely, if I were under the impression that the red button was likely to save everyone regardless of individual preferences, then it might seem like the logical decision in that situation as well.
Without additional information, the answer remains unclear, and thus I must conclude that I do not have enough data to make a definitive choice based on the given criteria.


Are you running ram compression or swap? That might help with oom, but naturally becomes another threshold top optimise.


It’s definitely also the user’s problem. It’s their information being leaked.
The best you can immediately and personally do, as others have said, is make sure there’s no personal information on devices you don’t own as far as possible. Also avoid using them at all as far as possible to minimize damage.


My guess: cruelty is the point.


Also, Russia had been the enemy of just about everyone since prehistory while Zionists are good friends with a lot of governments and institutions.


Both things can be true.


Also not doing anything about anything until the worst problem is perfectly solved is completely idiotic. You’d end up never doing anything at all.
Like arc welding.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czTB9FviGm0
I was instantly reminded.

The answer is zero.
Which is an everything problem, not a signal problem. Just in case it sounds like a signal problem.


Terrible name, almost zero info, only released for a few Linux repos and source. But maybe it’ll grow up.


They’re provably still happening, just not being shown to you.


Ingsoc is already here.