I played one character that would have been able to deal with 30 5-th level paladins, but she made it to 40th level before the DM retired her and made her part of the pantheon. Once she was 17th it would have been barely doable, do to her having taken silent spell, still spell, and eschew materials, but once she was 21st level she'd steamroll that many low level characters with a single spell.
While I appreciate the sentiment, I wouldn't want future archaeologists to waste time trying to identify the nonce. Carve his name and crimes on his bones before he's buried in an unmarked grave
Edit: also Saxon? I thought the British royals were descendents of Charlemagne, who famously killed the Saxons.
You seem to be correct. It's been a couple years, and I forgot it only applies to state level immunities. As far as I can tell SCOTUS would have to overturn Harlow v Fitzgerald.
The Federal Government made QI illegal in 1881. Some unnamed secretary illegally changed the wording of the law in 1884 and it wasn't noticed until recently.
If you were on the frontier it was expected. If you were trying to carry in towns or cities you'd get arrested. Also since the milita were better organized, most of the members didn't want to store weapons in their own homes.
Remote. That is the key word you left out. That word makes what you said make a lot more sense. There were a ton of data breaches that weren't remote before Arpanet.
Giddy-Up Buttercup?