Susan Horton had been a stay-at-home mom for almost 20 years, and now—pregnant with her fifth child—she felt a hard-won confidence in herself as a mother.

Then she ate a salad from Costco.

Horton didn’t realize that she would be drug-tested before her child’s birth. Or that the poppy seeds in her salad could trigger a positive result on a urine drug screen, the quick test that hospitals often use to check pregnant patients for illicit drugs. Many common foods and medications—from antacids to blood pressure and cold medicines—can prompt erroneous results.

If Horton had been tested under different circumstances—for example, if she was a government employee and required to be tested as part of her job—she would have been entitled to a more advanced test and to a review from a specially trained doctor to confirm the initial result.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    And let me guess, she paid for the privilege of being forced to stay 5 days and having her baby taken away from her? Unless she’s got amazing insurance?

    Honestly, I’m so glad to live somewhere with public health care.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    A lot of this article is about drug testing, but this also should remind people how much chaos one shitty, or overworked, nurse can cause.

    • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      3 months ago

      Omg yes! I perform drug testing and I’ve had instances where nurses called CPS before we could give them a confirmation result causing mayhem for all involved. It makes me want to scream whenever I see screening tests used as evidence against people. Any hospital or government agency making those kinds of decisions based on a screen should be sued to high hell. Also fun fact really high levels of Benadryl will cause you to pop positive for PCP on most drug screens. I’ve had to talk a handful of pediatricians down about that over the years too.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had a fun event a year ago where I woke up in a Covid ward after surgery because a nurse saw antibodies on a pre-surgery Covid test.

        I had covid about a month before, that’s why I still had detectable antibodies. The doctors all knew that. That’s why they admitted me and performed the procedure.

        You should have to clear something past an actual doctor if some things are going to get escalated.

  • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry but anyone who thinks people with thc in their urine are less valuable than people that don’t, is a worthless piece of human trash themselves. It’s appalling that this is even a thing but more so how many people actually support it staying the way it is.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I was listening to a podcast today or yesterday talking about huge recruiting shortfalls in 3 of 4 military branches in the US. The biggest factor was that the available pool of recruits are 75% ineligible for a variety of reasons, but the biggest factor is past/current drug use. The most common drug: cannabis. Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

      It seems pretty foolish, in the biggest recruitment shortfall in American history, to discount your largest possible pool of recruits just because they might’ve smoked a doobie once.

      • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even if someone has used it only once, even if they just tried it, they are ineligible for military service.

        Well that’s just false. You’ll get denied if you pop hot on a drug test at MEPS, but they don’t tend to care if you’ve smoked in the past, except as a barometer for if you’ll smoke in the future. And, like almost everything else in the DoD, there’s a waiver form you can fill out for it too

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Can confirm. I signed said waiver. I told them that yeah, I smoke weed, but if my job requires me to be clean, I’m clean. Except Adderall. They gave me 30 days to get clean, sent me to MEPS and made me a Nuke. Then nuke school wouldn’t let me leave and they made me an officer and an instructor.

          I joined the Navy to see the world, ffs. I’d already seen South Carolina :/

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lmao I’m picturing a series of comedic events like guy enlists to quietly do his service and sail the world, but keeps getting promoted and sent to the most boring places.

            “Congrats Chief, were sending you to West Virginia”

            “Congrats LT, we’re sending you to South Carolina”

            “Congrats Commander, we’re transferring you to… Montana”

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I left as ET2 and 90% of my time was at prototype in Ballston Spa as an instructor. I went on one short tour and we saw the Persian Gulf.

            Y’all still got a gator that hangs out down there? Are the students still headed to that shitty dive bar that didn’t used to check IDs? I’m genuinely curious because I haven’t been there in over 20 years, but I heard the shitty dive actually checks IDs now.

        • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So as someone who’s in his mid 20s and chops more grass than a lawnmower, what kind of experience would I have trying to enlist?

      • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I hope every employer that continues enforcing thc testing in the workplace collaspes. Many of them are already on the brink. I just want to have a normal life and still get to smoke weed sometimes. All I know is that I will continue working towards that goal until I succeed, deal with it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        How would they know though? I know it stays in your system for a couple of weeks but not for months or years so you could just lie on the application form.

    • ngwoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      She tested positive for heroin, not THC. If she was actually actually heroin, child protective services involvement would absolutely be warranted.

      The issue here is the erroneous test and complete failure on the part of the hospital to confirm its results

          • Disgracefulone@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            She tested positive for codeine, the weakest opiate you can possibly get because to trigger any bigger result you’d need a thousand poppy seeds or more.

            The hospital is 1000000000² % at fault here. Any competent medical staff doesn’t let this happen.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think poppy seeds make you test positive for THC.

      Not that it really matters but it’s a bit of a stronger drug that it emulates

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      Counterpoint: Walked my dogs past a Gradeschool (5-13yo) during the hustle and bustle of the first morning of class. Smacked in the face at 8:30am with the stench of weed.

      Pillars of the community. No doubt.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think there is a better test. The cheap and fast one is tricked though. The fact they didn’t do a more advanced test before taking her child is pretty fucked.

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed.

      It sucks for everyone involved too. The mothers, the doctors, the hospital, the caseworkers, all seem to be locked into a ridiculous position because of poor testing equipment, and overly protective laws.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            3 months ago

            Anyone at every step of the way.

            “Whoops we didn’t collect enough urine to perform the test.”

            “Whoops I spilled it and she’s already in labor”

            “Test came back as positive? No that was a false alert”

            “Whoops I filled the wrong information in the report and sent the authorities to the wrong place”

            “I came to check on her and she clearly wasn’t on drugs so I left”

            Etc. These are moral failings of everyone along the way.

            • ravhall@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              3 months ago

              That could land them in prison, or at the least they would lose their license in addition to fines.

              You’re asking medical personnel to bypass requirements, and in this situation I totally understand how that seems like a win-win, but that’s not a practice we should be encouraging people to do. That’s how people die.

              • andyburke@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                “I was just following the rules”?

                On the one hand, you’re correct.

                On the other, you need to think and be brave and be willing to take a little risk sometimes to protect others. Otherwise we end up with something like the quote above and…

                • ravhall@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Mmmm I think it’s important to test. However, the problem is those tests are crappy, and shouldn’t be used as evidence. The solution is to require better tests, and not skip around laws and regulations designed to save lives or protect people. That’s not bravery, because bravery is relative. IMO.

                  I think that the hospital should be required to perform better tests if the initial test comes back positive or questionable. They can call child services, but child services should not be able to Take action until a more thorough investigation happens.

              • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                The choice is between separating a mother from a new born child and not separating her. The mother is now childless, and the child will probably end up in our horrific adoption system. Maybe they will find a loving parent, or maybe they’ll end up loveless. The choice should be easy to make.

                I’m not saying lie on all tests. Just on ones where the moral boundaries are incredibly clear.

                • Duranie@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Ok, would you be willing to gamble your career and freedom on her word that she tested dirty because of eating a salad?

                  Because your name would be on the paperwork and one of the first individuals pulled in if something questionable happens a year from now and they start auditing. That’s what you’re suggesting other people do with their lives.

                • ravhall@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Morals are relative. And losing or manipulating tests is against the Hippocratic oath, the very foundation of medicinal treatment.

                  Thorough investigation should always be done before accusing someone, and all of those drug tests should be considered a false positive until they rule everything out.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m getting worn out from all the crap to be infuriated about these days. It’s fucking overwhelming the amount of dumb-as-fuck shit capitalists, right-wingnuts and generally lazy people do to others, just for funsies it seems.

        • infinite_ass@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The internet has become a fury delivery system. The stories that infuriate us, they are designed for exactly that. Reality is something utterly apart from the stories.

    • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I heard her talking about it on NPR earlier today. She did get her kid back, but it was a whole fucking ordeal she and her family should have never had to go through in the first place (and thank god she had the resources to fight it)

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also lovely way to start a childs life. Instead of being at the chest of its mother, it gets to be with some overworked strangers, not getting breat fed and not feeling the physical closeness necessary to build a healthy sense of security.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    For decades, state and federal laws have required hospitals across the country to identify newborns affected by drugs in the womb and to refer such cases to child protective services for possible investigation. To comply, hospitals often use urine drug screens that are inexpensive (as little as $10 per test), simple to administer (the patient pees in a cup), and provide results within minutes.