

No i mean even just away into another room routinely
No i mean even just away into another room routinely
I know its super in-fashion to shit on the concept of “vibe coding” but I really do wish there was a more boilerplate way to remove having to worry about designing the UI/UX so I could focus on getting the MVP functionality down and having it relatively neatly display, more akin to designing a form or Apple Shortcut.
I have tons of forms I’ve designed that are basically de facto programs that I can whip up super easily and just pick the data “type” for each “line” of the form which essentialky equates to a line or block of code in a code program. Decent looking enough, interactive, can easily high-level edit and tweak shit and test it to make sure it mostly fool-proof produces the outputs that are needed.
Whenever I think of all the graphical and UI and UX stuff that has to go into making a viable app I get so discouraged, I hate having to think about all that stuff and the geeking around to make it functional let alone aesthetic
I’ll bring it up at her vet appt. Does it change things if there was a throw blanket somewhat shielding it?
Rules for thee not mee
So owned, so masterfully owned…
I believe it is to the same extent that the President of the United States is immune in carrying out official duties and with equal breadth and arbitraryness. To accept anything less licks the boot that says all are equal under the law but the President is King
Its equally outrageous that a president can pardon people to the idea that a citizen or multiple citizens together can do the same
Just because the President being able to do it lawful doesnt mean either aren’t equally arbitrary and thus amoral
If the law is wrong or its being applied unequally, legitimacy must be restored to the law by uniting those the law protects and those the law binds. If the two should depart they must be reunited
Its actually not, I’m just curious because they obviously try to screen out anyone even superficially aware of it so it raises the interesting question of how that would play out societally, like would the death penalty leverage essentially be erased and in what other ways would it affect jurisprudence and application of the law
Not commenting on “quiet quitting” meme thing
As they should
Reddit or the community
Yes
I honestly was fucking pissed at Reddit for destroying Apollo so I read a headline about a burgeoning alternative that was fundamentally different in spirit if not in letter from Reddit
Nuh uh, its -grapist! 👉👈
Yeah thats absolutely fair and shitty of them, there has to be a way humans have acted better and more responsibly in sim circumstances
Its more of a going concern, no concern about it staying or going and we’ve had a nice little sidebar out of it so Saul Goodman 🫡
Thought experiment: what might they have done to avoid that? I’m not on their side or anything, I’m legit curious to meditate on if shitty people always have a way or means to not be shitty and they just globally and consistently choose the wide path
I’m thinkint there are probably dog litter pads or something someone could theoretically train their dog to use if they have to work enough hours away where that becomes a concern…
Definitely a lack of empathy and I guess I would say “sense” in general, but I wonder seriously if my first impulse response to these thing is not a little ittie bit priviledged
I mean how’s he going to capitalize on it? Like taking the credit for it to increase his political capital or use it to reverse-leverage NDP into supplying further votes for when he need them to play along?
Please don’t provide dictionary definitions as an answer, its almost never going to be what the person was requesting clarification about and comes across a bit gauche. Like if someone asks how to define something, sure, but its not super helpful here
How do you mean by capitalize? Like he’s going to keep them rolling out
Very cool i did it