About half their articles are about how the world is going to end, or what common household objectives gives you cancer, the other half is just right wing racist dog whistle stuff.
Been the sun journalist must have become much easier recently since they no longer have to make their story's up, they can just ask AI to do it for them.
Move to smaller instances. There was a huge problem with everybody being on like four big instances and the whole point of federation is you don't have to be like that.
Move to instances hosted on a laptop in someone's basement in Peru with like 106 users or something. Make the fascists work for it, if you all conglomerate on one big host then they've got an easy target and you've got a massive single point of failure.
I would love journalists to rake discord over the coals for this and have them explain exactly how they think that this mentality is acceptable in the current political climate. Of course they won't because journalism is dead these days.
They didn't do lazy research. They didn't do any research, the lazy bums. They put a pump into an AI copy and pasted the output into a blog post and hit post. The only way they could have done less work is if they'd integrated the AI into the website to save them have to do the copy and paste.
What do they have to investigate? Did one of them accidentally get an AI to write the article and then accidentally post the article, like they just fell on the keyboard and accidentally typed in a prompt? Come on.
So is the paid version just because I like them and want to give them some money or they're actual feature benefits of the paid version over the free version.
I don't mind paying in theory but they're trying to replace a free product so the "pro" version would have to have significant benefits.
It wasn't just the smear campaign against Corbyn though. He did quite a lot of shooting himself in the foot as well, which really didn't help matters.
But really none of that should matter to Labour, the media are for the most part in the pockets of the right anyway so who cares what they say. Most Labour voters won't read those papers anyway.
What's pissing off a lot of traditional Labour voters is all this fence sitting he is trying to do. People elected a liberal government, so obviously they are going to be expecting some liberal policies, that was what they voted for, that's what they wanted. If they wanted someone to sit on the fence and ruminate about every possible decision the Liberal Democrats are right there. The reason that the Greens didn't get a lot of votes this time around was because people didn't want to split the vote, but if Labour are just going to be Tory Lite (although frankly not that lite) then who cares, we might as well risk it because otherwise we'll end up with a right-wing government either way. It baffles me that no one in Labour HQ can see that.
I honestly think that if labour just fall on lent into it, they would probably get way more votes than they currently do.
I've seen cars with self-closing doors though. Also I'm not sure where the safety consideration would come in since we have self closing building doors right now and no one seems to get cut in half by those.
Labour need to remember that much of their coffers come from the unions. They don't need to be sucking up to the wealthy, that was in fact originally the whole point.
He won't though. I don't know if someone's got something on him or what but he is acting in a way that is entirely detrimental to the party success. The only way labour standard chance at the next election is to get rid of him.
He should have been good and he talked to good game but he's gone back on virtually every single promise in the manifesto, which honestly should be illegal.
Well that was obvious from the start. By all means arrest people who commit crimes but calling those crimes terrorism was insanely stupid.
It wasn't even done any particularly sinister reason, it was just them being dumb. Terrorism charges obviously carries longer prison sentences, but that in no way benefited the government, so there was no reason for them to do that. They just came off looking bad at a time when they really needed their public image to improve. I've said this before but it bears repeating because every time a story like this comes out it makes labour look like the US republicans but they're not. They're just really really really really stupid.
Starmer used to be a human rights lawyer, so I don't understand how he's so bad at his job.
Yeah The Sun doesn't bother with the second part.
About half their articles are about how the world is going to end, or what common household objectives gives you cancer, the other half is just right wing racist dog whistle stuff.
Been the sun journalist must have become much easier recently since they no longer have to make their story's up, they can just ask AI to do it for them.