• Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Reasonability of the solution aside, Samsung is uniquely positioned to propose such project as one of the largest electronics manufacturer and shipmaker in the world.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s slightly less stupid than data centers in space I suppose. But I still find it pretty weird.

    You will have to be tethered to land anyway. Properly high bandwidth networking as you would usually see to connect a data center (on the order of a dozen terabits per second) only exists through fiber optic cables. I’m sure of this point, because optical networking is my day-job, though we only run 400 Gbit/s links on the fastest edges since we’re a small national network.

    As for power, well there are 80 MW ship engines (e.g. Wärtsilä-Sulzer RT-flex96C, which has even been built in Korea under license before), so it’s not impossible I suppose. But if you are tethered, then the country you’re tethered to will probably forbid you from burning bunker fuel for 80 MW on its coast. At which point you’d be reduced to running clean diesel or something. That I expect would make the power more costly than just tethering to an electric grid

    So now we have a big barge rather than a ship. What do you really save then? I guess the price of the land? And you gain access to copious amounts of saltwater, so you can do closed loop cooling with freshwater, and do the secondary heat exchange to the ocean. But you could do that by building on the coast too. Okay I guess you might gain tsunami security over a coastal building.

    If this is a real proposal why don’t they tell us the material advantages they expect, rather than making us guess?

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The amount of heat is going to be negligible for the ocean, especially compared to a permanent structure pumping heat into the ground or a neighborhood. I’m more worried about how they’re powering the things. Probably some fossil fuel.

  • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What a beautiful coincidence.

    I am building ethically sourced, renewable, solar powered torpedoes, and I will not be seeking regulatory approval.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    because the ocean warming and inevitable collapse of the gulf stream wasnt happening fast enough, apparently.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Data centers arent big on the job creation front to begin with. Once they are built its basically a security guy for show, and a tech that flies in once a fortnight to deal with the odd, occasional issue.

        a floating datacenter would probably have even less jobs, since they probably wont need the security guard to keep the punk kids away anymore.

  • com@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Terrible article. Does not answer the “why” question. What is the advantage? All it says is that “Seasides can ease the pains of giant mainland AI date centers”. Is it just skirting around taxes and rules, like a floating casino? The ship would have a shoreside power connection or power itself as well apparently. Would the ships generators be subject to the same emission requirements as shoreside plants?

    Seems like just a floating barge that will not really be out at sea, just sitting in protected bays or up waterways. Cooling water, would have to use a closed circuit freshwater system with heat exchangers cooling it with saltwater. That would consume less water than the evaporation cooling method, but still is not listed a possible reason.

    Ships are expensive. What is the reason for floating a data center? Cheaper than land near big cities? Less regulations? Less taxes? Cooling water? Cheaper electricity?

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Im somewhat surprised nobody has mentioned how corrosive salt water is. This likely would have to be some platform like an oil rig with power and internet via cables. So why not buy Sealand and build it out? Still lots oft Saltwater in the Wind and offshore but no need to have it floating around in rough waters.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Makes sense. Leaves our potable water alone and keeps the fuckers out of sight. They could even put in wind turbines to power the fucking things.

      • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The water is being warmed by burning hydrocarbons which emit massive quantities of CO and CO2 which in turn hold in the sun’s heat which in turn causes the oceans to heat up dangerously. Not to mention CO2 is an acidic gas which wreaks havoc on marine life and land life.

        The amount of heat instilled in the oceans from this type operation is negligible.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pirates are gonna have an awesome day. I will buy all the stuff they can steal from it.