Nobody is wanting to make a magical algorithm that gets the input to the hash.

I mean, there’s provably at least one person who does, but there are infinite inputs that lead to the same hash.

Breaking a hash is being able to easily create new input data that leads to the same hash (with or without the constraint of needing the original input data)

Oh so both hashes and synmetric cryptography are secure entirely by doubling up the key size. Interesting.

You know way more than I do.

Then why are hashes secure?

Perhaps it’s: military grade (40 years ago)

I love how it did not at all explain what they broke. It mentioned “rectangle”? Whats that? How does it have any relation to AES? Because AES is NOT vulnerable to quantum computing. Did they get the key by knowing the ciphertext and the original data?

Dino is on desktop. OEMO is XMPP’s implementation of the double rachet.

Dino and Conversations. Some don’t have OEMO so be careful. And yes it has video chat.

XMPP is absolutely the best option if you don’t care about metadata protection.

What file?

So require an upfront cost for the service.

Just like every feature on every car?

(Satire)

That statement which Mr. Trump made was later sued by Mr. Trump himself for trademark infringement. To quote the opening statement: this is just too on brand to not be infringing on my client’s image. Mr. Trump lost the suit the lawsuit despite the defendent not showing up in court. Mr. Trump did not pay his lawyers.

Most languages are like this. Even C is like this.

Yep. Because that’s the default. And the corporate garbage says that the other stuff is a worse experience.

The fifth circuit can die in a fire. It’d be a great preview of hell, too.

I second this. Anyone know the code reference?

The reason so many people are fine with using corporate garbage is ironically the same reason they’d be just fine using something that wasn’t that. Users can adapt and learn a system way better than most people think.

No it’s a berry.

That too