• InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So at this moment these taxis has drivers, but eventually they will be driverless and be priced “competitively, but premium”. They cut out the driver’s wagen and charge more?

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I can’t wait for someone to invent some tool that allows me to fry the brain of every Waymo that I drive by

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This reminds me of the old “we can’t exist without copyright theft” defense from AI companies. Okay, well, maybe you shouldn’t exist?

    • fun_times@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Copying is not theft. “Copyright” is actually a privilege, a copy monopoly. Its original length of 10 years was a reasonable compromise between the right to freely share culture and the desire for artists to be able to live off of the incomes of their work. The current “70 years after creator’s death” is absurd and oppressive.

      The real problem is that AI companies copyright/monopolize the things they copied.

      • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What are you even talking about? The real problem is that the AI companies are not being held accountable for breaking the law. Who cares what the original implementation of copyright law was? Why do AI companies get to play by different rules (hint capitalism)

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 day ago

      Breaking laws as a business model is how a lot of companies started, look at Uber and AirBnB for example. They even have a name for this, they call it “disruption”.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    a cyclist in San Francisco sued the Google-owned company after she was seriously injured when one of the brand’s driverless taxis stopped in a cycle lane and a passenger opened its back door, striking the cyclist

    Well, in Germany the cyclists would have the law 100% on their side and win every case.

    is “normal practice” for the autonomous vehicles

    And if it is done deliberately (repeatedly), then the car’s operator is in the area of criminal law.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, in Germany the cyclists would have the law 100% on their side and win every case.

      Likewise in the Netherlands, because our laws are still sane.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Difference is that in the Netherlands you will barely come near a car when cycling. Germany‘s cycling lanes on the other hand are barely distinguishable from the road.

        • Bababasti@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          What do you mean, a few dots of white paint on a four lane road is perfectly fine cycling infrastructure!? /s

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      In Germany, someone would snap pictures to write a ticket before they even got out of the car and I’m all here for it. Sometimes being petty is exactly what we need.

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, in Germany the cyclists would have the law 100% on their side and win every case.

      Law on their side: probably Winning cases: aus Mangel öffentlichen Interesses eingestellt…

  • skami@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just like how youtuber “not just bikes” said it would be, cities would be much better improving public transportation than complying with whatever big tech companies tell em to do

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I work near a Waymo station and they have ~5 cars per minute just wandering around the parking lot there. They have zero business there. Just driving aimlessly.

      • skami@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I knew this would happen but didn’t though it was happening right now, I think if cities or entire countries won’t do anything bout it right now then as time passes this cars will much more than 5, also I genuinely think in the future they could program this cars specifically for them to get in a public transport way so it will slow down and more people will go with waymo or whatever

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hope the reply from Europe was rolling on the floor laughing at Waymo as they pointed them back to Murica with their shitty tech

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    So Waymo is basically saying, get rid of bike lanes or we will kill and maim bicyclists. Or don’t and we’ll just start the killing and maiming.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Jury nullification is still a thing. If someone smashed up some waymo property, find them not guilty.

      • nautevenkidding@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Is it in the UK? Not sure how their jury system is set up. Fwiw, other western european justice systems use civil law and don’t do juries, so it is not a thing there.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They are right in the sense that I expect other cab companies to do the same.

    You need to push against the industry, not be fueled by AI hate when an issue is mostly independent.