• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    We don’t have enough air traffic controllers.

    We use AI to reduce their workload. <---- We are here

    We don’t need as many air traffic controllers.

    We sack more air traffic controllers.

    We don’t have enough air traffic controllers.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe this will finally bring back a solid rail and bus transit infrastructure again.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    So even flying over America without landing there is going to become dangerous.

    Best choose flights with Polar routes, going the other way around or which fly over South America instead.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I tried to use AI to install a reverse osmosis water system yesterday, I asked it to look at manual for hose colors to match them, I figured it would save me a few mins.

    After an hour of it not working and trying all sorts of nonsense I looked in manual to have it show me it had given me all the wrong information to a simple task.

    I can’t wait to have people’s lives reliant on this technology.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      AI is a pretty big catch-all term. If they mean specially designed and trained deep learning neural nets, maaaaybe it’ll be okay. If they mean typical LLMs we’re straight up fucked.

      • RogueJello@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Exactly. With a broad enough term those computerized screens showing the position of all the planes is “AI”.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I watch an art restorer out of Chicago on youtube, and he’s developing his own AI to help restorers. He says it’s a closed system. Is that something that could work? I’ve been wondering about that since he announced. (Baumgartner, if you’re interested).

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just saw an ad for using ChatGPT to “come up with new recipes and baking ideas”

      Yeah I’m sure having a bunch of people decide to eat whatever a hallucinating AI comes up with isn’t going to be dangerous at all…

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I’ll look it up and try to find it. But I’m pretty sure there’s a YouTube video where they actually did ask Chat GPT to come up with new recipes and baking ideas and then they tried to make them to the results you would expect.

        Edit: ok, so it looks like there are a whole lot of YouTubers making AI recipes to the expected results. So Google away.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck AI for this, but there’s a lot of room in ATC for further automation. To be perfectly honest, if the planes can more or less land themselves, and they’re all fly-by-wire, I could see nearly automating the whole thing. Phase it in over a 10-year plan… computers HAVE to be able to be better at this than one unpaid, overworked, under-rested controller.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m all for automation if it works and if it improves safety but as far as I know they haven’t proven that yet. I’d like to see an AI air traffic controller running in a simulation for many many years of simulation time first before we would even begin to talk about implementing it in real hardware.

      • limelight79@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s the problem. No one wants to test Ai like that. Just dive right in and use it, I’m sure it’s great!

      • fira@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Could test it out at small low-volume/non commercial airports first & go from there

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’d start with computer Sims before putting people’s lives on the line, but then from your suggestion

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The question is whether the AI or the human is more prone to mistakes. It’s hard to do that without real world tests, unfortunately.

            Like self driving cars. Of course they’re going to be involved in crashes where people die, but humans are such terrible drivers that the computers are better (except for Tesla which just has mislabeled lane assist)

    • BlackAura@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Counterpoint: just look at the Air Canada crash that recently happened where a controller let a fire truck cross in the path of a landing aircraft.

      Planes may have all this technology but that only involves what’s happening in the air, not on the ground.

      Now maybe all ground crew could have vehicles equipped with transponders and tracked as well, but there are also incidents of people randomly ending up on the runways / taxiways, or animals, or non airport vehicles.

      • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        With the amount of AI powered cameras being put up around cities around the world… Yea they could use tech like that to monitor runways too

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      AI is fine for this… assuming we’re talking about a specifically trained machine learning model that is actually made to handle ATC and not just shoehorning an LLM into a job it was never intended to do.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Honestly, I’d put it at too high a risk for weighted models. We have ton’s of pathfinding navigation code out there that could solve this outright on a raspberry pi :) not that i’d reccomend the pi…

    • Hakuso
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Forget flying, you’ll be getting Donnie Darkoed in your bedroom.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well, once the mistakes start to pile up I will probably get a lot less judgement from others about my apprehension of flying.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    In the future when anyone suggests some cockamamie idea, they are going to say “That was another Trump era failure. We already tried it, and it didn’t work.”

    Then some dummy will say “Yeah, but that was Trump. He was an idiot. We’ll do it right!” And then we’ll waste another few billion.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Bold of MAGA to think the future is theirs. It’s not. We will have the future we want.

        MAGA can’t survive, they are too virtuosically incompetent, and far too stupid to recognize it, so they will eventually collapse under the weight of their own breathtaking ignorance.

        It’s up to MAGA to decide how far they want to go before they lose, and they’ll probably want to go scorched earth, because they’re psychotic like that. But we won’t let them, and scorched earth will apply to MAGA and their Socioathic Oligarchs.

        It’s going to take strong Democratic leadership, so that means the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries need to be ejected (and investigated, I’m not positive these losers aren’t Manchurian MAGAs), and replaced by people who are aggressive about playing Hard Ball.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            People need to stop saying that they expect that there will be no punishments for the breath-taking corruption we’ve been subjected to for years. Politicians are inherently lazy and greedy, and if we send the message that we expect them to betray us, and we will accept it, that’s exactly what they’ll do, and go back to their favorite pastime, insider trading.

            They need to hear the message loud and clear, that we expect retribution for the CRIMES of MAGA, and we won’t accept ANY excuses. If we weaponize out votes to take back this country AGAIN, and they squander it AGAIN, there won’t be a third time.

            It will just be the French Revolution, starring The Guillotines, and the Dems will be in line, just as much as the MAGAs.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, the Simpsons already are that for stupidity, so yeah, he’ll beat the Simpsons, if for no other reason that his goofs have real-life consequences.