• BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The problem is the house is so overvalued, they never modernized it, and is far beyond what most people can afford for it. They’re just born at the right time to be able to retire and have a house.

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        nah it’s deregulation on corps buying homes as investments

        like usual thank republicans and neolibs

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          And buying up all homes, then renting at high rates and making the market so scarce that the few that can afford to buy get bid up to the maximum they can get a loan for, and then stay enslaved to the mortgage banks and never fight for their employment rights, healthcare or political rights or anything else that could jeopardize their livelihood.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not even an exaggeration. My parents bought their house in the 1960s for $14K. Their 30-year mortgage went almost to the year 2000 and their monthly payment was fucking $85 the entire time. They sold it fifteen years ago for $190K.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Damn never realized this but every boomer homeowner is actually an investment savant. Why are we all so stupid? Why can’t we just do this? ^/s

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          The dumbest financial mistake you’ve ever made was not going into debt immediately to buy a home the day you were born. Should have planned ahead.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        $14K in 1960 was $167,000 by 2010.

        Average salary of a worker in 1960 was $3,700.

        I paid $320K for my house in 2002 , which peaked in value to $1.6M by 2022. That was insane, it’s now worth $1.2 or less and headed downward.

        It should be worth $600K. People took out HELOCs on houses now descending in value.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          It should be worth $600K.

          Yeah, the location was not one of those places with seriously insane housing appreciation. Small town in Ohio. 14X appreciation is still pretty good.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      $20,000 in 1965 is equivalent in purchasing power to $212,776.51 today.

      So it’s not about savvy investing, it’s about inflation.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I do not like calling people trying to afford to buy a pile of lumber and tape on a small parcel a “market”.

    It removes the fact that homes used to stay flat value or go down in value before houses became a “market”.

    Fuck markets. The markets should be crushed. And American home builders should be ashamed of the quality of American homes.

    A pile of lumber and tape.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Of course, a “market” doesn’t have to mean the thing is a financial instrument. I go to the market to buy grocereries. I am not intending to resell the carrots that I bought from “market”.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        And yet grocery stores are in a similar situation with prices going up while quality and quantity go down. Maybe it doesn’t have to mean the thing is a financial instrument but if it can be it will be.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      What’s wrong with making houses out of wood? It’s renewable. It has an absurdly low carbon footprint. It’s a fantastic building material.

      • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 days ago

        Over the last 50 years material quality and workmanship have gone down. Now it’s a race to build a neighborhood as cheaply and quickly as possible, doing the job right be damned.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ll be honest with you: my house was built in the 1940s and it’s really not that great. Definitely not noticeably better build quality than my parents’ house built in the 1990s.

          • iocase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            You should look up CyFy on YouTube. He does residential building inspection in Arizona and the build quality is appalling. Broken trusses, lacking insulation, roof leaks, stucco with exposed wire backing on top of literal cardboard for structure…

            Cracks in the sinks and tubs, walls so horrifying out of square you wonder how they managed to fuck it up that badly. Unlevel floors with humps or saddles. Tiles misaligned so badly you can take a strip off your foot without realizing.

            There’s always multiple things from the above in every house he posts… And it’s not just one house, it’s all of them. Literally all of them… They deny, delay, defend the shit out of warranty claims and at least in Arizona hope you close and don’t raise a fuss before hand.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              That’s because he doesn’t get called in unless the homeowner believes there are egregious problems for him to find. It’s sampling bias, not a universal trend.

              • iocase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                He talks about this in his videos where he’ll see the same problems in half the homes in a neighborhood because neighbors talk to each other and recommend him

                Edit: just watch some of his videos you won’t have to spend much time to see what I mean. It’s systemic…

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  “Systemic” within one neighborhood (or even one builder) isn’t the same as “systemic” in general. I mean, of course if one builder doing something wrong, he’s likely to be doing it wrong consistently. But unless that builder is, say, D.R. Horton (which, to be fair, it very well could be), you can’t really say that just because one random builder is doing it wrong that means the entire industry is doing it wrong.

              • iocase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Oh yeah you’re right lol I forgot about those somehow! I laughed when he checked like 8 houses in a row and they all leaked.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Builders know most of the buyers are Boomers who will be dead in under a decade, so make everything last 11 years.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’ll add that I recently bought a house built in the last decade and the home inspector remarked how well put together it was.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        They’re not talking specifically about the lumber being bad, they’re talking about companies building new developments cutting corners to save on cost. While they still use lumber, they are choosing cheaper lumber and their workmanship suffers as a result of the corners being cut.

        Thus, a pile of lumber and tape.

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 days ago

          Also, older homes were built with natural old growth lumber, which is denser and more rot resistant. They also used larger dimensions for extra support.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          My house was built in 1942 as temporary worker housing. I tore down and rebuilt one of the walls and the original studs were just astonishing: perfectly straight and not a single knot in them anywhere. Compare and contrast with modern studs from Home Despot: split, shaped more or less like a pretzel, and 50% knots.

          Interestingly, these old studs were 1.75" x 3.75". I never knew there was an intermediate stage between the old-time true 2x4s and the modern 1.5" x 3.5" 2x4s.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            it’s not Home Depot’s fault we cut down all the old growth wood by the 1950s. Builders should be sorting the lumber and returning bad pieces…but nothing a sheet of drywall can’t hide.

            But Home Depot wood in Canada is the best quality, kiln dried. With softwood tariffs, US yards are scraping the bottom of the barrel and shipping crap that would have been shredded.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wood is fine. It actually traps carbon, but the build quality is horrendous and permit inspectors must be corrupt.

      • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I will give you an example, a notoriously large home manufacturer has continued to create waves of houses built with the cheapest materials they can find. Once people started to move into these houses they noticed something strange: insects ripping out of their newly built walls

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      home builders should be ashamed of the quality of American homes.

      Friends let us stay in their new house in Ellicottville NY across the border from Ontario. Holy shit are there no codes and inspections in NY state? Explains all those youtube videos where people slip on a porch and take out the entire fence and stairs.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    Step 1 - make housing unaffordable

    Step 2 - start crying about declining fertility rates

    Step 3 - just keep whining and applying bandaid solutions that don’t do anything to address the underlying cause of unaffordable housing

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is something I keep thinking about.

        My wife and I have been together for 20 years. For the majority of that time, we have been taking care of various silent-generation and boomer members of her family who decided that they will just dump themselves on the most compassionate and competent member of the family (my wife) and thats their retirement plan. Right now we are dealing with her mother, and we have made it clear to the rest of her family and my family that after her, we’re done, and anyone else can live under a fucking overpass because we would like to be husband and wife, not caretakers.

        My wife has become adept at finding care facilities that take medicare and placing people in them. But not everyone has the time/ability to make that happen.

        Of course we are not unique in having this issue. What happens when two people are staying in a 1 bedroom apartment that they both must work to afford? They might really want to care for mom and dad but…

        And we end up with considerably more homeless boomers.

        • lemonbun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          yeah this is on them to figure out. Hoping their end of days is no one else’s problem but their own

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah my sympathy ran out around 2016. For some reason.

            The eldery and truck drivers: two groups of people I used to respect, until I met too many of them.

            • lemonbun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              same here buddy, used to have alot of respect, just their actions don’t deserve sympathy. got tired of the get mine attitude. our generation and newer generations just get the shit end of things and we don’t get a chance to play by the same rules.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    Boomers (b. 1946-1966) bought houses long before they were $70k. Assuming a great job straight out of high school, the first ones would have been buying homes as early as 1964, the last boomers by 1984.

    Taking the middle - 1974 - and in my neck of the woods the median 1974 starter home was about $16k CAD, and the minimum wage was $4k/yr. This put even minimum wage workers within spitting distance of the flip side of the one-third rule, which states the price of a new home should not exceed three years of income. Workers in good industries - such as framers, plumbers, and electricians - easily met this 3× rule even within a year or three of starting work.

    So the better phrase would be:

    boomers bought houses at $16k when they were making $6k/yr

    • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 days ago

      And the fact that you’re each working multiple part time jobs and gigs, well that’s the extra freedom we had lying around.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah. The fact that most couples have to go dual income just to survive is a problem.

      We used to have the leeway to have one of us not work and still be comfortable.

  • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is how the billionaires are winning, they manipulate folks into being angry at everyone but THEM. “Boomers” didn’t buy $70k houses, your grandparents did.

    Meamwhile, Zuckerberg is laughing his ass off while fortifying his Kauai ranch estate.

    • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Boomers” are the grandparents to most of social media posters these days. Statistically the internet stays centered at about teenager to 20 year old being the peak of the normal distribution of users. That’s the Baby Boomers’ grandchildren. Great grandchildren even.

      Just pointing that out, but otherwise I agree. They’re all angry at a strawman “Boomer”. That strawman in reality is demographically a small portion of the world population who are very rich. The majority of baby boomers got fucked in their own way by the rich.

      You guys are all distracted into fighting each other.

      Furthermore, I’m continuously baffled at how or why people fawn over the anecdotes about those who talk about their parents having a good life straight out of college and now owning multi-million dollar homes. How can you not realize these anecdotes are from rich kids of rich boomers. You guys are so hungry to eat the rich??? That’s them right there. What are you praising and fawning over them for. Start eating.

      All part of the distraction. The lesser than billionaire rich hiding in plain sight, running distraction for the richest of the rich.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not just the US, we can’t buy a house anywhere, boomer cunts stole everything from future generations and will claim to their dying breath that THEY had it rough.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      Dont fall for the intergenerational war. The rich are sitting on all the assets and stealing from future generations

      • CptOblivius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ya but they rich are mostly boomers and boomers are actively voting and supporting policies that make this worse. It’s not universal but does hold some weight.

    • majster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Correct. What all these places have in common is housing expansion after WW2 when personal automobile became a thing for majority. There is no more cheap land. We are back to 19th century and it sucks.

    • VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      So you grew up rich? Your parents had no struggles at all right? So I mean, wow, that must have been nice. They basically had infinite money to raise you with… that’s awesome. I’m happy for you

      • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        What? Where did i say i was rich? How does your brain function? And my parents didn’t have struggles?!? My mother and stepdad didn’t have power or running water for 5 years in the Balkans btw, whether that’s legal or not who knows and i don’t think the cunts that turned it off cared anyway.

        • VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          You said, “boomer cunts stole everything from future generations and will claim to their dying breath that THEY had it rough.”

          But then you said, “My mother and stepdad didn’t have power or running water for 5 years”

          Weird, it’s almost like they did have it rough after all

          • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You need it spelt out for you or something? My mother was born in 1966 so she doesn’t qualify as a boomer and also those boomers that you want to defend could buy a house or two with one income while having 4-5 kids while most of us today can’t afford anything with two incomes and no kids.

            • VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              oh wow, so you were the first poor family? I had no idea life was a perfect utopia where nobody struggled until your parents. I always thought the story of Adam and Eve was something that took place millions of years ago but it turns out it happened in 1966.

              I’m honored to meet the child of the first humans to ever suffer

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not all boomers, just the loud ones. I’m surrounded by boomer neighbours who own their properties and are vocal about the complete lack of options for current generations. I meet more of the loud ones at work though

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      LOL 😂 in Canada, if minimum wage - currently $18.25/hr - was indexed to home prices starting from 1972, when median homes in my city were $16k and minimum wage was $4k/yr, said minimum wage would currently be $150/hr, or $300k/yr.

      That’s an 8.22× jump in minimum wage.

      I would love to see most people being faced with this fact.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        I realize the Canadian dollar is weaker than the US dollar but $18.25 is a pipe dream for tens of millions of Americans. Our minimum wage is $7.25. As of today that is $10. 29 CAD. Wages in my area are a little higher, places generally pay $13-15 and maybe $20 for skilled jobs. But I know a ton of people making around $13. Even that is basically right at Canadian minimum wage after converting. Our housing isn’t cheap either.

  • Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Meaningful change will only happen when fewer than half of all people own houses. Now, more than half owns a property, and, if the system was to change, they’d lose money. More than half the people will uphold this status quo.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It hurts homeowners who aren’t interested in ever moving as well. Property taxes are based on home value.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          That depends on a few more factors.The fact that their home values have skyrocketed does go a long way to alleviate that.

          Yeah, what may have been a $60,000 upgrade is now $250,000, but they’re also getting another $200,000 for their home when they sell it, which makes up the difference.

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t know how evenly houses go up or how much consistency there is, but going from $100K to $200K is easier than $300K to $600K.

            Housing price increases are almost certainly making the gap wider for upgrades.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              The thing is they aren’t going up evenly everywhere. A $400,000 house from a few years back in my area is now selling for $600,000, but a $100,000 house from that same time is now selling for $300,000. So the price difference between the 2 has actually stayed the same.

              The institutional investors are targeting the cheaper houses, so they’re the ones skyrocketing the most in value.

              • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                So still a net loss for those wishing to upgrade.

                As you said in another comment:

                I’m not saying homeowners are in a worse position. Just that increasing values also hurt them.

                My parents had to move out into the country into a smaller house because their taxes got so high they couldn’t keep up after retirement when they quit getting raises.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ya but property taxes are still significantly cheaper than rent, and most states have some exemption for a portion of the valuation your first home. The same doesn’t apply to renters, and in many municipalities multifamily zoning has significantly higher property tax rates to begin with. Many conveniences of cities are built around homeowners since they’re the majority of voters. In my old apartment despite trash at the property being taken by the city, apartment residents did not have access to the city dump for recycling and large trash items. Meanwhile residents owning a single family home did and could even get them picked up as part of their regular trash bill, which was $5/mo less than what we in the apartment paid for trash.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Do all the math please.

          Home ownership includes property taxes and maintenance. New roof, new furnace, new water heater, etc. These are big bills every 12-15 years. Boomers did this with HELOCs, but HELOCs are gone as housing values in my region are going down from the peak in 2022.

          Another big problem is contracting is unregulated and out of control, before 2020, contracts were typically materials x2 for labor, now they have no upper guidelines, just a rolling scam and they learned in 2020-22 that it’s better to work less and charge more.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m not saying homeowners are in a worse position. Just that increasing values also hurt them.

          My parents had to move out into the country into a smaller house because their taxes got so high they couldn’t keep up after retirement when they quit getting raises.

          And of course they’d taken out extra mortgages on their house to try and keep up with the increasing costs so they could stay in the town they’dlived in for 60 years, so they didn’t actually have a ton of equity despite their home having massively increased in value.

          And with all the other old people moving out into the country, the property values where they moved are skyrocketing, so they’re already getting upside down and I’m already having to pitch in to help them pay the mortgage on the smaller home.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can still buy homes in US cities for under $150k. I just looked up my first home. I paid $37k in 1996, sold it for $74k in 2007, it’s worth about $125k now. It’s not a great location, but there are good jobs around St. Louis. If you want to live in an Instagram home in a big coastal city, I have no sympathy.

    The sad part is that I make less money today than I did in 1996, not even factoring inflation. Inflation isn’t so terrible if wages move with it, but wages are completely stagnant even as prices double. I can’t afford to move. I’ve been stuck in my current home since I bought it. I just hope I’m able to pay it off before I’m no longer able to work.

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    The only reason my wife and I could afford a house is because we live in one of the lowest cost of living places in the US. Even here it’s still almost triple what it was just a few years ago.