He is so very, very very clearly fucking dead. He’s dead. The guy is not alive. Mitch McConnell is ACTIVELY IN HELL, RIGHT THIS SECOND. I said that as a fact BEFORE the lying machine informed me that he was FUCKING COVERED UP when they wheeled him out on a stretcher. That information makes me believe there is an actual negative chance that mitch McConnell’s body presently contains his own blood
For some reason I feel possessed by the spirit of liberalism and im just so aghast that this lie is so obvious and yet every rules nerd watching is just like “ah but that’s the rules, though.” Like ahhhhhhhh holy shit
I like to think he is alive and fully conscious but unable to move while he is in excruciating pain that inflames every part of his body and makes every second of his continued existence actually experienced hell on earth.
i too like to believe justice exists
Family Response: His wife, Elaine Chao, was traveling in China at the time of the transport. Her spokesperson publicly stated that McConnell’s health condition “did not warrant an immediate return to the U.S.”
HE’S FUCKING DEAD. AND HIS WIFE HATES HIM, LOL
the rich and powerful don’t marry for love
Imagine being Lindsey Graham and they just announce you died straight away, whilst they’re trying to turn McConnell into a fucking myth so he can never truly die.
Mitch McConnell will be buried in a tomb mound and resurrected at the end of days for the final battle with the adversary of all that is good and true.
They are gonna bury him in his mound with all of his staff, so they can pass anti LGBT laws in the afterlife
it’s only because KY governor is a Democrat. South Carolina is a Republican gov so they arent worried about that seat.
filling up the hallway outside the hospital room where they’re taking his pulse, chanting “STOP THE COUNT”
How did i not even think of the discrepancy
Ah, but there’s no rule that says a senator has to be alive!
I think he’s technically alive, in the sense they haven’t taken him off life support, and they’re milking that for all it’s worth.
So how often are you talking at the LLMs these days? I notice you mention them a lot
Like this specific instance was me typing in “mitch McConnell’s dead as shit, isn’t he” and it tried to argue because I guess they really want it to not claim living politicians are dead or something, and I was basically like “nuh uh he’s dead” in an angry way (sometimes it gets it to recant its position) and it spurted out the bit about the stretcher being covered up. I guess i could have learned that from watching the video 🤷♂️
LLMs are not trained on current event data and therefore it is going to argue. Oh my god.
Actually it can’t argue because arguing requires intent
It is going to be”claim” otherwise.
To be fair I did spend a little bit trying (and succeeding) to “convince” Deepseek that the US bombed iran and it did a whole "this is obviously some hypothetical situation you have come up with so i will respond accordingly " until i made the thing parse news articles about it.
I don’t use them basically ever but tormenting pretend people has been fun since those flash games where you beat up a poorly drawn little guy so i get it
Bullying the AI into correcting itself after it gives you liberal brainworm slop is fun. I think people should enjoy it a little, as a treat.
I figure if i at least use a chinese one it’ll help whatever they got going on vs the us based ones
I google a lot of shit and that hasn’t really increased or decreased, I’ve just stopped adding -reddit and parsing through forum conversation for shit if the information presented to me seems like it isn’t made up. All in single instance incognito chrome tabs so it’s not keeping conversational context or anything (i think people going 10000s of words into a single instance where it tries to “remember” all that shit is a large driver of them giving really fucked up outputs) and so that I can tell myself I’m minimizing the utility of the data my use gives Google. Any “talking to” an LLM i’ve done has generally been in the form of me having a weird question/idea/phrasing and wanting to see how it reacts to it (which, every time i engage in that way, I really feel i should be paid for because I’m basically doing QA shit for free) either out of curiosity for the question or to better familiarize myself with the LLM and how it works and responds differently to different phrasings (i.e. me figuring out that just going “oh come on” causes it to go off the guard rails most of the time)
The only reasons I even mention it as the source of whatever info i’m discussing at the time is 1) so that the information can be taken with the grain of salt that it needs and 2) as a reminder to both myself and others that the machine tells lies. I know it does!
But yeah i guess I’m doing it a lot and if it annoys you, you’re not alone, my partner doesn’t like it either. But like I said, I google a lot of shit and I did so before they put the lying machine into the search browser, so subjectively I feel like I have this fun experience where I learn something by essentially the same path as I used to but it’s bad because it’s a socially disapproved of source
You are not thinkings about this correctly imo. The machine doesn’t ‘tell lies’. The machine has no method of actually discerning the truth content of a statement. The machine isn’t lying, it is telling you exactly what the algorithm has generated for it to say because it doesn’t know and can never actually know, how to tell false data from true data.
It has no actual epistemology.
Okay but I know that and this seems like quibbling over the nature of intent to tell a lie. The inaccuracy machine doesn’t sound the same
Telling a lie requires intent, lying requires to know what the truth actually is. Machines, at least these ones, do not have intent, nor the ability to determine truth from falsehood.
You are basically agreeing with tech propaganda by framing their machine this way, even in a negative light. You are adhering to their narrative that these are Artificial Intelligence, a concept that has now become so overbroad, that we have to say “Artificial General Intelligence” to discuss what people thought of as “AI” up until this whole LLM, LIM and LAM boondoggle.
They are not intelligent. They have basic control and stimulus response, but that is like saying your digestive system is intelligent.
Okay i think you’re just taking my calling it a lying machine too literally, i’m still gonna call it that
It is an objectively wrong description of what is happening, and the way you talk about the machine means that I know you are anthropomorphizing it, even if you are doing so negatively. That is why you keep using it and talking about it as if it has an agenda.
The machine cannot lie. It does not have the ability to lie. It is a falsehood machine.
what if google tells lies through the machine and you’re just really hyper focused on whether or not i think it has agency to lie for itself except that that doesn’t matter and the way it’s programmed to respond will inevitably result in lies due to corporate interests and propaganda, and you’re actually just being a huge nerd at me right now for no reason
I feel like I have this fun experience where I learn something by essentially the same path as I used to but it’s bad because it’s a socially disapproved of source
I hadn’t thought of it this way so I’m sorry if you feel like the questioning is misplaced. Not trying to shame you, by the way, just noticed how often you seem to cite the LLM and wanted to check in.
Maybe that sounds weirdly paternalistic my bad
No you’re fine and I don’t feel like you’ve done anything wrong asking this, it’s something that’s just especially on my mind because i’ve annoyed my partner with this
Oh good. I’m bad at conveying tone over text, unlike everyone else one earth [/s]
It really is the theater of the absurd. Every bit of it, honestly
But have you considered the picture of him with his wife where he is holding today’s newspaper. Surely you understand that we lack the ability to convincingly fake still images?
Lack of Siren Urgency: The neighbor who filmed the transport noted that emergency responders worked quickly and efficiently but did not appear panicked. When the ambulance departed the neighborhood, it did not activate its emergency sirens
HE’S GONE
We polled 100 Americans on what is most likely to happen in us politics this year. What are the top five answers?
Hey Steve, Im gonna go ahead and guess “Corpse Synod”
Let’s see corrrpse synooood!
DING DING DING
Audience freaks out
They are going to keep him on life support and replace him with AI, and the supreme court will allow it.
According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics, until we check Mitch is both alive and not alive
Schrodinger’s Mitch.
It does not seem a good idea cuck on politics and live others dreams. Better be a player on this matter
Security: U.S. Capitol Police blocked off the street during the loading process. When asked by bystanders what was happening, police would only confirm that they were responding to a "medical emergency.
THE MAN IS DEAD
Lich McConnel impedimoging the Kelce/Swift wedding
Lich McConnel
Mitch McConnel’s getting the Terri Schiavo treatment.
How does faking that piece of shit McConnell being alive help the Red nazi party of america
Kentucky won’t have to hold a special election they risk losing, if they can keep his death unconfirmed until the end of July.
They’re gonna do it aren’t they. And I mean just more proof the Dems are absolutely useless and controlled opposition
… Unless somebody slipped into the hospital and inspected the morgue or found where he is and pulled the plug… Like that one episode of Andor…
that was a great episode too
