• wylinka@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Do you remember the term “adware”, like it’s a kind of virus? Now even your operating system shows ads XDDD.

  • TheLazyNerd@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People can grow completely desensitized to the negative meaning of a word.

    In programming, programmers rely more and more on other software: Libraries, built tools, testing environments etc. These were being called dependencies by people who thought we relied to much on them. dependency is a word with a negative meaning, but today programmers happily add a new dependency to their project to save 3 lines of code.

    A lot of modern hacks happen through these dependencies. Programmers are looking at kinds of solutions to make dependencies more reliable, rather than trying to reduce their number of dependencies.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People can grow completely desensitized to the negative meaning of a word.

      Something that the modem conservative movement has discovered, and glommed onto. Unfortunately, very successfully.

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not always as stupid as you make it sound. Sometimes there are many subtly different ways to achieve a basic result and using a common component rather than rolling your own can be the difference between familiar and surprising behaviour. Although obvs if it’s 3 lines just c+p that, but it’s unlikely to really be that

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 hours ago

    My job wanted everyone to install Teams on our personal devices. I really didn’t want to but reluctantly agreed until I found Teams wouldn’t work without some other Microsoft app whose purpose was to reformat my system files into two sections which were personal and work. I said I would not allow that on my personal device and if they needed me to have teams they could provide a work phone. They looked as though it was the most unreasonable thing they’ve ever heard. I feel like 20 years ago this was the exact thing people were warning us about when installing programs from the internet, now no one bats an eye.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I went through this exact same thing at a previous job, and they also reacted like I was speaking another language. These weren’t dumb people either, but they were very much the types who had never spared a thought to anything about technology, much less privacy.

      They eventually offered to pay me a monthly stipend and put it back on me to use that to buy a work phone or just pocket the $. I didn’t feel like going through that hassle, so I caved and just kept the money.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If the company is sued and your personal device is also your work device, everything in it can be part of the discovery process. If it’s a criminal affair, such devices can be confiscated as evidence for an indeteremined amount of time.

      This shit goes way beyond “mere” privacy concerns.

      If the incompetent idiots keep on pushing for you to run company stuff on your devices, simply point out that it would legally expose you to the company’s legal affairs.

    • goosygirl@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Honestly, you are supposed to keep personal and work devices separate. Not only does it provide work life balance, but it also avoids lawsuits.

      Yes, people have sued workplaces for infrigement of privacy

      There is a fine line between work and personal life that should never be crossed!!!

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The blank stares and annoyed if not downright condescending dismissal I get from normies when I express a preference for avoiding spyware, adware, and other socially acceptable (read: profitable for those who make the rules and own the politicians) malware is some of the worst gaslighting I’ve ever been subjected to!

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      By that definition, many paid apps are also viruses! Have you ever tried practically any anti-virus software, for example?

    • adb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Maybe I’ve always misunderstood the term but it seemed to me that spyware was a category of malware that would secretly and excessively harvest user data whatever the purpose or the actor behind it. I’d guess this was more likely to be done for commercial or criminal purposes than state surveillance or espionnage.

      Indeed, this quote seems a gross misrepresentation but is it not that harvesting of user data for commercial purposes has become so ubiquitous that the term has shifted to only designate malware used by actual spies?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, now they call it “telemetry” and pretend it’s somehow normal and acceptable. But no, it’s fucking not – it’s still spyware!

        • wylinka@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s nothing wrong with telemetry, it’s not supposed to contain identifying or private data. It’s information about feature usage, crashes etc. and it’s very useful for developers. Especially with open-source software, the devs are generally not your enemies, they just want to improve their products. If some apps spy on you under the guise of telemetry, that’s a different issue.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Right, but most of the time it’s for things that do not need to know where I am or any of my private data.

            And then all of that conveniently gathered and stored information is just waiting for a bad actors (including corporations) to scoop it up.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I might suggest that security suites like McAfee themselves becoming synonymous with Malware undermined the core concept of system protection ages ago.

    Modern Windows based security protocols offer significant bloat with only marginal improvements in safety.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The bigger issue is that having your third-party “security” software betray you while using Windows is like pissing in an ocean of piss. The OS itself is spyware!

      • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        McAfee and other antivirus went full-on malware a long time ago. Sure, Microsoft was still collecting data from users, but it was a drop in the bucket compared to what they do in Windows 11 these days.