I think it's probably just framed that way because Russia never officially took responsibility for it, not because anyone believes Ukraine really did it
I very much doubt that the primary motivation to be the first person to walk around the world from South America to the UK is a bet. It's ... Y'know, probably more to do with being the first person to do that.
I once solved Goldbach's conjecture in only 7 lines. Mods absolutely deleted it. Reason given? Damn, if I could remember that I could remember the proof
Particularly egregious because any private replacement of a govt program is inherently a monopoly and therefore, by economic rules, almost certain to be wasteful and shite. And outcome metrics are financial rather than intentional. Yeah but ok let's not go down this hole, we all know where we stand.
Why would you bother talking about them, I suppose. Bitching about dickheads - fun, wow, everyone loves a moan. Complimenting the capable? Dull, flat, uninteresting
Batshit doomerism, you sound like one of those religious nuts expecting the rapture any minute. You don't have some privileged insight into 'how bad things are gonna get' or whatever hypothetical revolution you've conjectured, yet you presume to lecture others about it. Please, tell me again about narcissism and what it consists of.
I guess you had a pretty unpleasant life so far? Not everybody's has sucked. But I don't think I need to form a coherent argument against 'all reproduction is inherently morally bankrupt ' - it's such deliberate bait that it rejects good faith discussion off-hand.
Is there a more coherent argument to be made against hyper-natalists? Yes, I think that could plausibly be upheld. But that would be a more nuanced stance. The world, despite its trajectory, is not a hellscape.
92-98 when they stopped all being white Europeans. Although I have girls and can confirm that 2009's Princess and the Frog is the best Disney princess film.