What a loser
18 minutes and I’m the only person who upvoted you??? Maybe it just needs to be said louder. Let me have a go…
DONALD TRUMP IS A LOSER WITH A DIAPER BOTTOM!!! NOBODY LOVES DONALD TRUMP!!! EVEN HIS OWN WIVES HAVE BEEN REPULSED BY HIM!!! THEY PULL THEIR HANDS AWAY WHEN HE TRIES TO HOLD HANDS!!! THAT’S NOT LOVE, THATS GOLD DIGGING!!! I’LL SAY IT AGAIN. DONALD TRUMP IS A LOSER!!!
That oughta do it!
Hey hey! I’m barely getting comfy on my throne. Give a man a minute to start dropping those logs first, damn. Have your goddamn upvote! Jeez! 😂
In a shocking new twist, Andrew Bailey is now being cited as “attorney general most likely to have a sack of hammers in place of a brain” in AI chatbot lists of stupid AGs.
Told you!
Hammers are useful though
But not in place of brains.
The man deeply unpopular with people who aren’t hateful lunatics.
Uh, because even LLMs are smarter than Republicans
They should just ask Grok, it loves Hitler.
Which is concerning in it’s own merrit.
ah fuck here we go.
Chatbots generate text based on human made text. If chatbots don’t like Trump, it must be because the source material espousing values that don’t match Trump’s policies and behavior is much more abundant than the source material praising it.
Two possible reasons:
-
Most people over the world belong to the category that doesn’t like Trump much therefore you see it reflected in the average output
-
You put your tinfoil hat on and you see the source material has been cherrypicked and the algorithms were designed by China-funded anti-american programmers
If we ever hear an outcome of this investigation, guess which one of the two will be
-
It’s ILLEGAL to NOT like Donald Trump, the man who Said his Best Friend Jeffrey Epstein is Innocent!
Why not sue Google the search engine as well? They’re both doing the same thing.
Right, well, AI has been trained on what has been written. And, history has usually been written by intellectuals. Also, historian intellectuals generally frown on acts considered “inhumane” and “evil”. So. Yeah.
Oh, you sweet summer child.
Throughout history, the so-called intellectuals have generally been the ones rationalizing atrocities and human rights violations.
After all, being intelligent, they understand not to piss off those in power. They know they’re better off defending the actions of those in power than opposing them.
The people who stand up for basic human rights, the people who speak truth to power, tend to be the less educated people. Like the abolitionists in the 1800s, when all the colleges were teaching students to pin educated arguments in favor of slavery. Like the men and women who marched for civil rights when all the educated conservatives were telling them it would destroy the country and all the educated liberals were telling them fighting was counterproductive. The people who say “I don’t care about complicated arguments, I don’t care what the intellectuals say, I see injustice and I stand against it”.
As 1984 puts it:
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right.
If AIs today produce text frowning on inhumane evils, it’s because they were trained on actual human beings posting on social media about what they actually believe, and not on the ramblings of genocide justifying political “intellectuals” like Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld.
Your citation for history is dystopian science fiction?
And BTW, the Civil Rights Act passed with bipartisan support when the white share of the population was even higher than it is today.
Die presse ist lügen!!!
