Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
5
Comments
934
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I personally suspect environmentally caused ADHD could be a thing.

    Ultimately, if the treatment methods and suggestions help, I have no issues with it being treated.

    It's also worth noting that ADHD (and sub diagnosis ADHD) are disproportionately represented in certain groups. My wife didn't realise she had a problem till well into adulthood. Since she was diagnosed, over half her friendship group are either diagnosed, or in the process.

  • When it causes active problems with life. It's also worth noting that it's a brain chemistry change. Where on the sliding scale you pick is, ultimately, a little arbitrary.

    I personally suspect modern life isn't helping. The pressures on children are quite different now. I suspect many children who wouldn't develop symptomatic ADHD in earlier years now do.

  • It's also worth noting that ADHD, as a condition, is mostly a Gordian knot of maladaptations. Built up over childhood (and beyond). While there are a lot of commonalities, you need to do a detailed investigation to pick out what bits are a problem to the individual.

    If you're going to go through that process, then you might as well not tie up an MRI machine for no reason.

    Drugs can treat the base problem, but don't work well without the follow-up care to repair the behavioural damage.

  • TSA luggage keys are a good counter example.

    In theory, only you and airport security can open your case. In practice, you can pick them up off eBay for next to nothing.

  • The UK used submarines during the Falklands war.

    The decision was made to sink an Argentinian warship. Critically, they didn't attack the escort ship. They left it to recover the sailors. Apparently it horrified the British command when it ran, leaving sailors in the water.

    A simple radio message "Move and we will sink you. Take no offensive actions and we will give you 5 minutes to launch lifeboats first." Hell, even a sonar ping would have given them half a chance.

  • You at least do what you can to give them a fighting chance.

    A radio message would have at least let them abandon ship in a (semi) orderly manner. Hell, even a solar ping would have got them into life jackets.

    Normally, a sub wouldn't risk this. They knew in advance, however, that the ship was not currently armed.

  • I actually missed that on my first pass.

    Thanks for the heads up!

    I also love the breakdown of costs. It's one of those little things that shows their mentality.

  • The energy to spontaneously create a planet is vastly more than a brain. Then again, with the weird maths of infinities, it might play out.

    Though to recreate the full illusion would require something closer to the big bang itself.

    It's well into the "here he dragons" realms of science however. Speculating well beyond reliable evidence.

  • Its more a problem with women's cloths, but there are 2 factors in play. You make them bigger than the listed size and someone can suddenly squeeze into a smaller size. A 14 fitting into a 12 is a big dopamine hit, and so a powerful selling point.

    Counter to that, reducing material usage can add up. 1/2 an inch off every pair of trousers adds up. For cheap clothes this is a noticeable saving.

    Most men tend not to try clothes on in stores. This makes us dependent on the numbers. We react strongly to errors. This kept clothing makers fairly honest. That seems to be breaking down. They are trying the same tricks they use on women, and it's annoying as hell!

  • Our best ideas on the big bang put the universe as huge, but finite in space. (Way bigger than the observable universe) The question is time. If time is infinite then Boltzmann brains win.

    Matter has a finite life, energy differentials run out. Stars run out of fuel. Black holes evaporate. Even protons eventually fall apart to energy. Then there is endless emptiness.

    That emptiness would be finite in space, but infinite in time. Without that last boundary, weird things happen to maths.

  • When the results are inseparable, then complexity is the only element, it doesn't prove anything, but it does bias.

    Also, most gods don't fall into this debate. Most gods would be quite happy interfering. This is (in principle) distinguishable from the null. It was aimed primarily at the simulation hypothesis. A perfect simulation is indistinguishable from a base reality.

  • My plan is to replace the bathroom extractor with a heat exchanger. It takes outside air, warms it using the exhaust air, then dumps it into the bedrooms.

    The living areas are easier. Opening a window for 10 minutes isn't an issue when you're awake and moving about.

    You can also get vent replacement versions. They flip flop between venting out, and pulling in, storing heat in a heatsink as appropriate.

  • It's also a local maxima trap. To shift to chewing, they would have to change both bite behaviour, and teeth structure. The intermediate stage is a lot worse than either style.

    Even if chewing was the better option, it's inaccessible from the crocs current method.

  • I don't want it too cold when sleeping, and heating a room with an open window is wasteful and expensive.

    I'm personally planning on installing an air to air heat exchanger. Even a cheap one can get 75% recovery. Add in some air sensors to make it smart and it's fairly fire and forget.

  • It's not 3 points, but 4.

    Atheist==>Theist Agnostic==>gnostic

    There are agnostic atheists and agnostic theists.

  • If things are not all equal, then we can slice off a section of the axiom, and start dissecting it, via science. The axiom only applies if things are exactly equal.

    E.g. Gravity wave detectors have found oddities, just above the noise floor. These are likely equipment artifacts. They are also consistent with us being in a simulation, and us touching close to the resolution limit. If true (quite unlikely) then it would prove the axiom false.

  • The logic is that the universe of big bang matter has a limited lifespan. This sets a hard limit on the number of humans via "normal" means.

    Boltzmann brains are due to a quirk of quantum mechanics. Matter can come into existence spontaneously. The rate is proportional to the amount (technically the energy content). Given enough time and space, something that would fit the definition of human could spontaneously appear. The odds of this are unbelievably long, but, so long as it's finitely large, in a true infinite universe it will happen an infinite number of times. It's a bit of infinity Vs very large number weirdness.

    End result is that there will be a large but finite number of "normal" humans, but an infinite number of Boltzmann brain humans. Therefore, the chances of being an actual "normal" human is effectively infinitesimal.

    Agreed about it not mattering, day to day. It's one of those things that is of interest to theoretical physicists, since it might tell us something interesting about the nature of our universe.

  • Preaching to the converted on that one!

    I do quite like the satanic temple's take on things however.

  • It's more reasonable via Occam's razor (more complexity is less reasonable, when everything else is equal). However it is still just a belief axiom. You have to assume 1 holds.

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Room temperature IQ is a far bigger insult in Europe than America.

  • homeassistant @lemmy.world

    Robot Lawnmowers

  • Android @lemmy.world

    Kids Tablet recommendations.

  • homeassistant @lemmy.world

    Low cost Zigbee GU10s via Ikea (UK)

    www.ikea.com /gb/en/p/tradfri-led-bulb-gu10-345-lumen-smart-wireless-dimmable-white-spectrum-40517647/
  • Linux Gaming @lemmy.world

    Recommended linux variant for gaming.