• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wasn’t LG one of the last ones of all monitor brands to go full Gestapo on the users?

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hasn’t this been known for years? There’s stuff for it built into ad blocking lists and stuff. I use NextDNS on my network, highly recommended.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah back when you could still get a dumb TV, the smart TVs were cheaper. The only way that makes sense is if they’re selling data to subsidize the cost of the TV.

  • mastod0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve put way to much effort into this. Got an Android TV and took about three hours to investigate all the preinstalled apps before removing bloatware and spyware via adb before replacing the launcher and other adware. Of course I had to do this three times because I deleted necessary stuff the first two times.

    Additionally this little shit got its own cage behind my firewall with connectivity whitelists, DNS redirects, and so on.

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The only way to avoid this, other than buying a dumb panel or projector, is to physically burn or disconnect the modem and any microphones.

    All the smug people who think they have not connected their TV to the Internet because they “didn’t give it access” are pretending like they are dealing with some cornball 1950’s company, not a 2020’s brand adversarial guv-corp entity. Crack it open and burn it, or Dremel a bit in exactly the right spot.

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You really just replied to my comment saying that is insufficient, under an article saying that is insufficient, with ‘that is sufficient’?

        • MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Um… What does blocking all internet access not prevent here? By isolated VLAN I mean isolated. I.e. fully blocked from internet access LAN local replies only. 0 WAN access.

          • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It doesn’t prevent exactly what my comment said it doesn’t prevent ‘an adversarial entity physically residing within the space’. If I showed up with a pi bristling with antennas, loaded with an unknown, encrypted payload, and plopped it into your living room, would you just hook it into a vlan and be like “there, now I’m safe”?

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            if a device manufacturer is so hell bent on their devices phoning home that they’ll connect to an insecure wifi or a wifi network run by a ‘partner’ provider… they’re gonna be doing that whenever it can’t phone home via a configured network connection, too, and not just when there isn’t one set up.

  • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 day ago

    LG was the only one mentioned in the GamersNexus News Story because that is the only brand they could afford to do a deep dive chosen because of the MacAfee popup scandal, and what they covered goes FAR beyond what this RTINGS rerelease of an older story they had done earlier but focused on just ACR. The GamersNexus story went far deeper, but at $80K for doing it for one brand, you are going to have to wait for them to make enough money back before they take on another brand.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They also had the ability to hack it to view exactly what it was doing and recording and trying to send and how. Without that access they’d be very limited in reporting.

      Someone else did the hacking work fwiw they just used the exploits

  • Hakuso
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    I saw someone saying monitors are going this way now.

    I’ve been using one over HDMI ever since “smart” started getting slapped on everything.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      some not only require the internet, but also an online account to link to.

  • Redvenom@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess well have to start mapping TV models with microphones and drown them in silicon or something

      • ContactClosure@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Sony put a mic in both. It has a switch to “turn off” the mic on the TV but IIRC the TOS says right up top they’re still listening.

        Cheap universal learning remotes don’t have mics, that helps a little.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Why would you pick the small battery operated device that gets lost under couch cushions when you can put a mic in the big thing that is plugged in 24/7 and by design has a central and open placement in a room?

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think you all know why are are here… Yes, you really really want a dildo!!!

    Repeat after me…

    I want to buy a red dildo!

    I really really wish I knew where they sold 12" red, silicon dildos with real looking veins and pullable foreskin!

    Just keep repeating that mantra and by tomorrow mornin… A couple of minutes, you’ll get temu showing you all the possibilities of the world of dildos.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah don’t use anything with voice commands. It’s just microphones recording everything.

    A lot of smart tv remotes have voice command buttons.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Anything capable has one. Apple tv. Nvidia shield. Android box. Roku.

      What can do high quality content and not require that a mic be in the room

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A Linux box you build and configure yourself as a media station. Plenty of generic keyboard remotes exist without mics in them.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Pc building is not cheap these days. I wouldnt say its beyond me but it is not an accessible route and difficult to get parity in features. For one CEC HDMI is nigh impossible on 99% of non custom boards.

          • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It’s certainly off the beaten track, and they’re definitely outnumbered by all the Android boxes, but they’re not hard to find preconfigured either. I’m just kind of biased since I prefer to build stuff myself on principle.

            https://www.ebay.com/itm/176976068094

            Idk if I’d call a $100 set top box (buy once cry once) “inaccessible”. Wouldn’t be my first choice, and I also wouldn’t be surprised if things like this come bundled with spyware/bloatware (just one of many reasons to prefer self-build IMO).

            HDMI CEC seems pretty standard on most modern-ish mini PCs as well. They’ll run you 2 or 3x the price of the one in the link, but the market’s not short on used - I’m still finding somewhat decent deals despite the hysteria around prices.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think this news surprises anyone. (well it shouldn’t at least) Don’t connect your tvs to the internet ever peoples!

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Problem is they are finding ways to still connect like via hdmi connection via your pc or other device connected that does have network access. Or public/open wifi and in large apartments or routers from Comcast and others that share wifi for other subscribers they piggy back off all of these.

      Its crazy because them selling the physical hardware isn’t super profitable but all your data is! This they need anyway to get it that they can

    • frtzngbllr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      You dont even need to connect it yourself. It can use any open Wifi in range as gamersnexus has shown. It is WAY worse than people think.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        And partner networks. Like in Canada there is/was “Shaw Go WiFi” where any shaw customer could connect and get internet access. If a tv brand partnered with them, all their shit could connect to those instead.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          yaaaaay. they put partner networks all over town so there’d be free wifi everywhere during lockdowns. knew they’d find a way to leverage it.