Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
21
Comments
1088
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don't mind if people don't wear a helmet.

    I got a kidney transplant thanks to that.

  • Costs too much.

    Could instead be turned into Soylent Green. Or fertilizer.

  • you are

    Jump
  • And my point is that it's self defeating to call yourself a feminist if you're egalitarian unless there's a reason for it. Otherwise, just call yourself egalitarian to show you're about equality to the general population, therefore you can recruit others to the cause more easily.

    My wife doesn't call herself a "teacher's unionist" if asked, she just calls herself a unionist, because the rights of all workers supercedes those of only teachers. Unless talking specifically to other teachers, parent students, etc, she champions the rights of unions themselves, and supports and encourages people to join a union, and union.

    The issue with many feminist groups is that they insist on being feminists first and foremost rather than egalitarians. This is what has lead in part to the existence of TERFs - by hyper focusing on women's rights instead of just agreeing "yeah, and I'm also an egalitarian", you open the door to exclusionary groups. Because while egalitarianism is open to all who are inclusive, feminism is not by definition of focus.

    It's not the only group afflicted by this, and it's part of the reason why the right wing has managed to gain so much power over the years - because while they all might be different flavors of hate and contempt, they are at least united globally behind hate and contempt.

    Meanwhile we have those who rally behind compassion and equality arguing we shouldn't all be considered compassionate and pro equality because there's "specializations" and that uniting under one banner weakens the cause somehow 🙄

  • Fighting simply for a "better life for all", while noble, is really naive. You need to get specific about the things you want to tackle.

    Egalitarianism isn't just "better life for all" without a plan, just like Feminism isn't "Equality for Women" without a plan.

    Uniting under the banner of Egalitarianism as a group, rather than stating you're not that but are instead a feminist, would be like saying "I'm not in the LGBTQ+ movement, I'm a Trans Rights activist".

    Everytime people like you insist (even if coming from a place with good intentions) we shouldn't consider ourselves egalitarian, you weaken all groups that would benefit from standing united under it. There's a reason right wing propaganda networks constantly argue against the term "Egalitarian" and try to keep groups like Feminists isolated from others - because it would hurt them if it actually gained in popularity.

    There are indeed many people who would not qualify as egalitarian. Libertarians, Republicans, Musk - all of them hate it, because "equality for all" is in fact not as broad as you would hope, unfortunately.

  • Because they are arguing against the "egalitarian" label rather than supporting both it and feminism.

    Today's specific problems tend to be rooted in a more broader affecting cause. The Waltons and Sacklers for example are not all men, but women too. The issue that affects women the most today are no longer about simply just the patriarchy but instead of the wealthy versus the rest.

    After all, the right wing usually doesn't have issues with abortion itself - only with abortion of minorities and the poor. Of the others, not of themselves.

  • If the rich face no consequences for breaking laws that help each other, but the poor do, then that is not justice.

    It is up to the people to decide if they would then rather live quietly with injustice or fight loudly for their rights, regardless of supposed legality or consequences.

  • How to get the point across a bit better while also pointing out the guy actually doesn't care.

  • yet you never see someone going up to the teacher's union rep and saying "but shouldn't you also care about the other jobs?"

    For ducks sakes that's literally how unions are SUPPOSED TO WORK. No wonder the US worker's rights are so weak if that's what you think, and based off your comment you're on the side of the workers!

    Here in Finland when one union goes on strike for a cause other unions join in! Airline union going on strike? Guess what, so I'd the railway, buses, logistics, grocery workers, and so on, with more joining in if it's for a really good reason, even teacher unions.

  • Every. Single. Time.

    Y'all really don't get why subdividing makes movements weaker.

    Here, I'll give you an easy way to see the flaw I your argument. Apply it to this flag:

    According to your logic, this flag shouldn't be used, because it's more vague than just the lesbian or trans flag for example.

    Yet, the reason this flag is used is because unity is more powerful than division. All those groups are more powerful in fighting for their rights together than they are separate.

    And that's the flaw behind modern feminism - the issues feminism was created to tackle have been greatly delt with. While some certainly do still exist, they are now also caused by things other than a patriarchy, such as oligarchy. And thus tackling the issues that affect women too in modern times needs the involvement of other groups as well, such as unions and even anarchists, to effectively combat.

    In such, movements and groups like these would more be much more effective in modern society reforming under an umbrella one such as egalitarianism, much like the LGBTQ+ ones have.

    Multiple causes together are more powerful than a single ones divided. Continuing this insistence is literally missing the forest for the trees.

  • I understand at the existential dread of realizing people are dumber than you can imagine, because we probably don't consider ourselves smart, just average at best, but as the old saying goes, "imagine the average dumbest person you know, and realize that half are dumber than that".

    Moving to Finland years ago did wonders for my sanity, because at least people are on average better educated here, and they actually do know basic things about stuff they use daily, like electricity and WiFi.

    People really don't know how electromagnetic things work in general though I suppose, especially in the USA.

    Using the key ring isn't even a completely original idea - I got it from remembering these "healing bracelets" exist.

    That's also why I recommended to Shalafi to just stick a magnet to it. Magnets are magic to a lot of people.

  • I've dealt with people like that before.

    The easiest solution is to solve magical bullshit with magical bullshit.

    "Oh you're right! Let me get the special magnet that blocks out the cancer causing stuff from the inventory people".

    Then you go out, get a random magnet, and just stick it on there.

    I once dealt with someone who thought being close to a router caused cancer.

    So I put a key ring "cage loop" on top of it that forced the internet waves into the ceiling instead.

    These people don't understand technology -it's just magic to them. So you give them magical solutions every time.

  • The US las varies by state, but in some cases only the boy goes to jail. In other both go to jail.

    Even your proposal of

    Why would you not make exceptions for kids under the age of 15 to have sex with kids under 15 and kids over 15 but under 18 to have sex with kids over 15 but under 18?

    Has issues. For example, if two teens were already having sex at 14 but one turns 15, although legal before, it's suddenly illegal, even if consenting.

    Same with 17 to 18.

    That's why your statement of "underage automatically does not equal consent" doesn't legally work.

    What I think would work better than a simple lower limit age ban would be to also include an upper limit age ban as well. I think perhaps of 2 years for 13 and under and 3 years for 14-18.

    That way, if say a 17 year old has a partner that turns 18 or 19, there's no issues. But if an adult that's 22 (or older) does something with a 17 year old it's illegal.

    This gives room for consent, because teens are able to consent - they should just be able to do so safely with their peers, rather than because they are targeted by older, more experienced/manipulative adults.

  • You wouldn't like how people in Finland speak then 😅

    (We have hän for s/he but almost everyone just uses se {it} in spoken language)

  • I get that you want to separate sex by force from sex by free will but when it comes to kids there can never be consent and it defaults to rape.

    The issue with that definition, legally, is if two 12 year olds have sex with each other, they would now both end up in jail.

    Things like that have happened in the USA btw because the law is set that way.

    The problem isn't whether they can or can't consent at that age - humans don't magically gain some universal phenomena of consent at some arbitrary number.

    It's the lack of foresight and knowledge of consequences, as well as the physical and mental health risks for young girls who get pregnant. That's why it's bad.

    That's also why the best defense against pedophilia is education about sex. And why the right wing globally usually is against sex education.

    If they know what it is and what it can cause, it'll be much harder for them to be convinced or tricked by an adult.

  • For a long while the browser was mining Cryptocurrency secretly, that what they're referring to.

    If you really really need a Chromium based browser then Vivaldi is a better alternative.

  • Orion

  • If reincarnation is real, it'd be real fucked up but unsurprising if Hitler was reincarnated as a Jew as punishment but instead of learning a good lesson he learned from his mistakes he learned how to get away with genocide this time.

  • Well, there could be way more sheep and goats than we think there is (since they include textiles in the livestock category).

  • *Bocox

  • Linux @lemmy.world

    Friend will have Windows if can't figure this out

  • Linux Gaming @lemmy.world

    Help or friend will need to have Windows

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Yunohost, CasaOS, or Cosmos?

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    How should everything be routed?

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Which would be better?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Golden Rule is flawed

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Just realized, ACAB in Finnish is KPOP

  • Opensource @programming.dev

    Open Source PC Fan/LED/Pump hardware?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    There's now more people that complain about AI then there is AI content on Lemmy

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Birds are just Nightcore remixes of Dinosaurs

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    What's your Nerf?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Is it really doom scrolling if it's just true?

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Nice backpack that looks familiar for some reason

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Boil em, Mash em, Stick them in a Stew

  • Trans @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    How to keep your privacy

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    The world waiting on US election results be like

  • Linux @programming.dev

    This is why it's not mainstream

  • linuxmemes @lemmy.world

    Unless you count android at least

  • networking @sh.itjust.works

    How to set up local home video game streaming with two routers?

  • Cooking @lemmy.world

    Rainbow Trout Plate