- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
You must log in or # to comment.
So just let me hand over my autonomy over to the capitalist pdfiles so they can go and entrap sick low level players so we can maintain the perception of improvement. If we had better things to do we wouldn’t be fucking around. L00ps, p00ps and dupes. Like we are committing a genocide but at least you captured the rapist pervert. Like a tooth pick in a volcano… marginal gains… inconsequential metrics to put on a show for grandma. phuck your chat g!p!ty beach… I want trees, clean water and sheet. What a dumb a$$ future
the capitalist pdfiles
You can say the word pedophile here.
Yeah but it ended up being a useful shorthand I like “PDFile” cause it also blends in the main problem BIG TECH
This shorthand ruined my job for me. Can’t open a .pdf without thinking about terrible things happening to children. I don’t understand how everyone is just okay obsessing over this shit when all it gets you is angry.
Because more people need to get more angry before anything happens.
Plenty of people are angry. Anger is not the thing we’re lacking. I don’t want to think about pedophiles while I work. They’re gonna keep existing whether or not I get mad at em while I try to read a document.
So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell:
“I’m as mad as hell, and I’m going to continue to take more because it’s distracting me at work.”
My man, I just don’t want pedophiles needlessly occupying my attention. Shit doesn’t even affect me. I have no kids. I know no kids. I’m just a grumpy old man shouting at clouds if I decide to be angry all fuckin day. You go be the change you wanna see in the world.
When the bread gets short thats when you will see change.
L33+ 4 FUN
Pedos aren’t “fun”, what’s wrong with you?
Habit’s forces, we all were once at the pdfiles space.
If you need sheets, and you don’t have them… I’ll buy you sheets.
poop
Shits.
“Low level pedophiles”? uh… fuck em all of every “level” as if the victims of “low level pedophiles” are less victimized or something? Pedophiles are like Nazis in the sense that every single one needs a boot on their throat, I don’t care what their rank is.
I have zero problem catfishing pedophiles and I think it’s bizarre anyone else would
ok reading comprehension bub… they selling you the idea of catching pervets while you give up you freedoms. This is a magga freezone. we criticaly think in hur. It is like “what if I promise we catch all the perverts but first we have to cut off your legs and you get no medical insurance.” You all are nazis anyways… inoccent people die on death row and that was before chat gippity.
The state prosecutor in Vesoul said he faced charges of making sexual advances to a person of under 15 years of age, and of soliciting an image of a minor for pornographic purposes.
So, while I get that this man could be dangerous and needs help… How exactly can you charge someone with propositioning a 21 year old who was pretending to be a 14 year old?
If he believed the person was under 18 I don’t see the difference, he understood it was immoral and illegal, why it was illegal and chose to do it anyway. If it was an undercover cop posing as a child it would be just as illegal
“I understood they were 21. The fact that they were an adult roleplaying as a child was understood by both parties, and it was obvious, given the wording they used. Roleplaying is quite common on dating apps. Roleplaying as a different age is so common it even has a name, age-play. When I messaged the other party, I thought I was pursuing an age-play dynamic with a consenting adult.”
Spotted the person rehearsing for his own court case.
Here’s a little problem, however: the courts aren’t stupid.
Good thing you’re not on a jury! I’ve met people who do age play but I haven’t myself.
Good thing, yes. Because I’m not stupid either.
I can tell the difference between people doing age play in age play-oriented RP environments and predators hunting for prepubescents on general chat, see. That’s absolutely the worst kind of juror for a pædophile.
Thing is, in a criminal case, the prosecution needs to prove the defendant’s guilt, hence they would need to prove that the defendant though they were pursuing somebody underage. How would they go about this?
You have a toddler-level view of how laws work. “But I didn’t say to kill them. I said to remove the problem.” That, for example, didn’t work for the mob, and nor is the shit you’re spewing here going to work either.
Again: the courts are not stupid. You’re making childish arguments that would embarrass a “Free Man on the Land” with your “I assumed I was role-playing with a 21-year old” nonsense. (Doubly so since this was a video chat and the AI-created girl was not made up to look like a 21-year old play-acting 14.)
Also, please stop acting as an apologist for pædos. It’s really kind of gross. (And go ahead and bring in the pædo-evasion: "AKSCHUALLY IT’S EPHEBOPHILIA!)
You just admitted the “girl” was an AI video persona, which is possible to identify with a trained eye. Thus, there was video evidence that the “girl” was being deceptive and all traits they claimed about themselves were suspect. To quote Ready Player One, “she could be a 300-pound dude named Chuck.”
The defendant could claim actual 14 year olds would be unable to orchestrate such a setup with AI personas. Thus, it must have been an older person doing it.
Again. Courts are not run by idiots, unlike, apparently, the pædo-apologists. None of that shit is going to fly in court.
Go ahead. Test this. You seem so fucking eager to. Go for it. I’ll fingerwave at your sentencing.
That, for example, didn’t work for the mob
And yet, it’s oddly difficult to convict a mob boss. Only when it was made illegal to be a member of the mob in the first place (RICO-act) was the US able to meaningfully push back the American mafia. Seems like it works to me.
(Doubly so since this was a video chat and the AI-created girl was not made up to look like a 21-year old play-acting 14.)
That is indeed a piece of evidence the prosecution could use to successfully get a conviction, because it disproves the assertion that the person thought they were chatting with an adult. Why didn’t you bring this up earlier? You’d make a terrible lawyer. And the fact that you bring it up as an afterthought shows that you don’t think of it is important. It’s almost like you care more about what the person has been accused of, rather than whether they actually did it.
Also, please stop acting as an apologist for pædos. It’s really kind of gross. (And go ahead and bring in the pædo-evasion: "AKSCHUALLY IT’S EPHEBOPHILIA!)
I’m defending the god given right of every man to a fair trial, whatever they may be accused of. Your belief that basic rights go out the window once the crime somebody is accused is significantly heinous enough is antithetical to rule of law and harmful to society as a whole. And, ironically, it makes it easier for real criminals to evade justice by making it easier to convict the innocent.
Why didn’t you fucking look at the fucking article that was under fucking review you fucking moron?
Are you asking about how the law would handle it, or morally, how would it be justified? 'Cause I can answer the second one really easily.
deleted by creator
Gavel, gavel: maximum sentence! No chance of parole. No retrial.
I’m surprised by this. What did you think I was going to answer?
The maximum sentence thing is a joke, by the way, don’t read into it. But do think about this: who exactly are we protecting by giving the opposing answer? Roleplayers? Roleplayers should still know with certainty that they’re talking to an adult. I’m not taking negotiations on this.
