He got into working satellite internet before everyone else
Satellite internet has existed before Starlink. What's novel about starlink is that the satellites are much closer to earth, which allows for a low ping, but comes at the cost of needing to replace the satellites every few years, as they'll deorbit by themselves, and needing a whole lot more of them. It only offers an advantage over cheaper alternatives (terrestrial internet or satellite internet in geostationary orbit) when you're somewhere without proper infrastructure, and those areas tend to not be wealthy. So, the question is, is there enough demand to pay for replacing the entire constellation of satellites every few years?
Well, seems like he learned his lesson. Would have been better if he had learned it before his bad advice got children killed, but at least he learned instead of doubling down.
Mistaking the map for the territory. The argument isn't that bitcoin is bad because it's used to buy drugs, it's bad because the network would choke if it even had to handle the economic activity of a moderately sized town.
Your[sic] not discussing anything honestly, your[sic] just derailing and trolling which is PR and Marketing[sic] firms 101 for comment farms and paid bots and it just so HAPPENS your[sic] following that pattern too[sic]. Must be a coincidence there as well.
Do I need to remind you that the title of this thread mentions the Rothschilds by name?
Between the new banking regulations, shell companies, trusts and attorney client privilege they can hide their true wealth and thats how the mega rich do that. Away of the eyes of the common persons ability to even know what’s up
So, basically, you don't have any evidence. Weird how you keep obsessing about them. Why do they scare you so much?
Why do you even care enough to defend them right now?
You do realize that I'm calling them has-beens.
They are at the center of, or at least concerningly involved with, every major social upset in my country for the last 200 years.
Let me guess, no evidence for any of this?
Never heard anyone defend anyones honor like this without a heck of a reason.
I spent maybe 10 minutes on all my replies in this thread, total. Kinda reflects poorly on you that you consider this a monumental effort.
So let’s hear it or fuck off with what appears to be, at this point, disingenuous and half-assed commentary to derail the conversation away from that whole concept here
Talking about the Rothschilds in a discussion about the Rothschilds is "derailing", apparently. Weird assessment.
I figure a ban of targeted advertisement would look like "The ads are only allowed to change once a day, and everybody during said day sees the same ads". Whereas currently, each time you load a website, there's an impromptu auction to sell the ad spots. (Advertisers don't actually have to pay until you click their ad). So there would be less incentive to keep the user constantly engaged, as it would be enough if the user just visits regularly.
No, I did not have to do that. Why do you ask?
Just saying that the sentiment I've seen expressed by open source developers towards gen AI ranges from cautious optimism to banning it. I've yet to see any open source team express that gen AI has been useful to them.
True, but line isn't going down yet.