• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Also Charles is a King in title only. Hes a tourist attraction. He has no real power.

    Unlike what Trump is trying to do/become.

  • ghaydn@lemmy.4d2.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Initially they said “US is not UK, it has no kings”. It implies “UK is not US, it has kings”.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    there where protests before his coronation, one dude was arrested for holding a sign as well. No one in a dck suit though from memory, apart from him of course ;)

    anyway, fuck that guy as well.

  • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It shows that they even missed the major point that a monarch from the country we freed ourselves from came here to address our Congress on the importance of saving the environment and keeping checks and balances in place to maintain democracy.

    He either brilliantly roasted Trump, or us if we never do anything to stop Nazis and rebuild and reform our country.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Most of them look like they honestly don’t give a shit. I see one guy who looks enthused.

    Also, “No Kings” means “The United States of America has no kings.” It bears no relevance to our diplomatic relations with monarchical states.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Also the actual literal King of the UK has less power in the UK than Trump does in the US and is very specifically not above the law like Trump is.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ah, well, y’see technically he’s got a fuckton of power, but the deal is he doesn’t use it or the monarchy is fucked. He is also quite specifically above the law.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        No, he is very very VERY specifically not above the law. The trial and execution of Charles I is a pretty major point in British history. Establishing the king is not above the law and parliament is sovereign.

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    My favorite part was when a huge part of the internet went down and suddenly, the amount of conservative posts/twitter users went silent.

  • deft@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is so stupid. Like people trying to call Dems the BLM party

    Voters =/= political parties. Voters created the no king protest, voters created black lives matter.

    Dems are parasites who act like they’re involved

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    We should make it a capital offense for a monarch or inherited noble of any kind to set foot in the US. Being a monarch of any kind is a crime against humanity. I don’t care how “constitutional” a monarch is. You’re still talking about a monster that dares to claim power over others simply by right of birth.

    We should still be open to diplomatic relations with monarchies. I’m willing to deal with diplomats, but this land should be unsullied by the rot of kings. The US really should be one of the most anti-monarchist nations on Earth. In fact, whenever I see one of my fellow citizens fawning over British royalty I want to call them a traitor to the Republic and everything the nation is supposed to stand for. Kings and Queens are not good people. Even the Constitutional ones are mincing freaks quietly waiting on the political sidelines, hoping for the day when democracy trips up and they can reclaim full power. Do you not think that deep in his heart, Chuck wishes he could be an absolute monarch just like his ancestors? He absolutely does. They all do. And that’s why they all should be forced to either give up their crowns or give up their heads.

    It should be a capital offense for any monarch or noble to set foot on US territory. Simply being a monarch on US soil should be enough to get your head cut off. Honestly, monarchs deserve far worse.

    Does your country simply want to have someone that fills the role of a king or queen? Fine. Hold an election and elect a non-hereditary, ceremonial king. That’s perfectly acceptable. But actual hereditary monarchs? They all deserve to have their head in a basket. Being a monarch is a crime against humanity. I consider crazed ax murderers to be better people than kings.

    A king is nothing more than the descendant of a serial killer that killed so many people he was able to claim total power.

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      While I’m personally against the monarchy, we’re all descendants of questionable people, at some point. For a few hundred years the Royals have been born into it. Some have maintained a vague sense of duty and decency, others have been self-absorbed idiots. I don’t think being anything your born into is a crime, as such. I actually think Elizabeth II did a decent ‘job’ and Charles likewise. I just think the entire institution should be abolished.