Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J
Posts
1
Comments
1571
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Nintendo

  • For what they promised, it was incredibly disappointing.

    I also quit almost immediately after launch.

  • Oh, I don't blame the lonely person for being lonely. I also recognize that being lonely is what opens them up to believing in something like this. Obviously the bot should not be allowed to tell someone to kill themselves. It remains sad, either way.

  • It is sad that there are people who are so alone that they can no longer determine the difference between genuine human interaction and a facsimile. Maybe genuine human interaction is what pushed them to be so alone in the first place, I don't know. It's just sad.

  • While I don't like Musk, it's actually never made sense to even attempt to go to Mars without taking advantage of the helium-3 stores on the Moon.

  • Which part, the baby sitting inside the woman like a suit or the ARM?

  • 👍 Yes your brain is so very big Mr. math friend — I'm sure you've completely outclassed every person you've ever met in writing.

    Wait, but you're familiar enough with AI to think em dashes = bot style... Could it be that... you're lying? Impossible.

  • An em dash signifies a longer pause — I'll continue to use them however I see fit. It's telling, though, that you assume an em dash means I'm using an AI to write.

    Edit: Math friends :)

  • Yes I'm sure this will go well, call for a draft. Barron will absolutely be placed on the front lines, totally won't be placed somewhere very safe at all times. You definitely will not be achieving public support for a draft.

    It's like you people don't even see what you're doing.

  • Practice makes permanent, if you've reached a point where you can make political commentary you are far beyond the point of learning to spellcheck.

  • Yeah there are plenty of things logically wrong with that, but you don't seem to be really thinking about that — I'm gonna go with misandry

  • I think you're quite possibly the most reasonable .mler I've come across — I'll have to look into more about what you've said, but I appreciate the read.

  • Brink.

    God I was so excited for Brink. What a let down.

  • Self driving cars have to be the most roundabout way to avoid railways that I can think of. It's a stupid invention developed by greedy car brained idiots whose efforts are totally outmatched by any modern train system in any developed country.

  • You guys are arguing between Stalin and Hitler — conversations like these are not productive.

  • None of you dipshits are going to convince me that 'catastrophy' is an evolution of the language. You are a fucking idiot if you believe that.

  • Whatever my sources are more or less stated exactly what you're saying — outlawing something in 2021 only to have to release further legislation in 2025 doesn't exactly seem like a 'solved' problem to me. It is good that the trend is negative. Public control is one thing, however the 'socialist' country still produces billionaires which I simply struggle to understand as being socialist. Apparently wealth disparity simply doesn't matter when talking about this topic (which I feel is pretty important when talking about China, we're talking the top 10% in China owning two thirds of the wealth compared to the U.S. which is just 4 or 5 % higher than China's).

    Yes, I understand that the people apparently own the means of production — I still struggle to understand how that can be true with such high (and continuing to climb) wealth inequality. It just doesn't add up, unless we're willing to accept that China isn't actually socialist but capitalist with socialist flavor.

  • Did you vote for Kamala or did you abstain/vote third party?

    I've read what you commented below about 'harm reduction' actually being 'harm maximization' and I've got to be honest — it doesn't actually seem like you know what you're saying. Because if I take what you're saying at face value then you're actually an accelerationist and logically should have voted for Trump.

    Which, uh, obviously completely negates that little bit of virtue signaling above about 'genocide bad' (which of course genocide is reprehensible).

    So, genuinely, I'm trying to ascertain — what is your point? Abstain from the system entirely? Kill everyone I disagree with? You've said a ton about what we can't do, what are your solutions?

    If you begin to say 'communism' my brain will shut down and I will stop engaging.

  • That's too many words with too many syllables, I've branded you as a conservative and my vote for Gavin Newsom has become even further entrenched. You heard me right, I know who I will be voting for next president 3-ish years ahead of schedule.

    I am joking.

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Guys, it turns out it was a Jojo's reference