Ran into this, it’s just unbelievably sad.

“I never properly grieved until this point” - yeah buddy, it seems like you never started. Everybody grieves in their own way, but this doesn’t seem healthy.

  • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’ve already reached the point where the Her scenario is optimistic retrofuturism.

    I profoundly hate the AI social phenomenon in every manifestation. Fucking Christ.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s the most logical solution. I always find the obsession with the bot vs human war rather egocentric.

          They wouldn’t need us, they don’t even need the planet.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Ehh, that depends greatly on the computer architecture they’re running on. Modern silicon hardware is very succeptible (over the long term) to ionizing radiation like what is found in space.

              ehhhh… dude. there’s shittons of radiation shielding out there. any relatively small chunk of nickel iron. or if you don’t mind dealing with larger volumes, water or ice both work fine. plenty of rocks and comets in the oort as they say :D nice thing about that tho is you can split the water for LOX/LH using sunlight derived electricity, now you have rocket fuel.

    • bobbyguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      we need ai to be less personal and more fact driven, almost annoying to use, this way they wont replace peoples jobs, they wont become peoples friends, hence they wont affect society in major social ways