• bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I hate how car manufacturers push SUVs aggressively and managed to brainwash most people into believing that they need a 2 ton vehicle for just driving to work. They clog the streets, damage them quicker due to their high weight and lower the amount of parking spots. They consume more gas, leading to more pollution. Fck everyone who drives an SUV. They are so fckn unnecessary.

  • the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    yup… baby crusherz for men who act like boyz … I wich upon a star for a ford ranger from back in the day

    FORD RANGERRRRRR

    I know this truck, I ain’t no stranger, I know that truck that’s a ford fuckin’ Ranger!

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tall hoods, poor intersection designs inhibiting sidewalk visibility, and idiots assuming “right on red” means they can blast through the turn without needing to check.

    • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s so bizarre to me. Even on green you sometimes have to stop if the pedestrians have green too. And right on red still confuses me. Why not have a dedicated green arrow light?

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You are supposed to come to a stop, yield for any cross traffic that has the right of way, then you can turn right when it’s clear.

        A green arrow light wouldn’t solve the problem because right on red is supposed to allow people to merge with the flow of traffic, and a green arrow would require there to be no traffic.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        In the 90s there were some regulation changes about how headlights worked like requiring them to be open if the mechanism failed and pedestrian safety that made them difficult for car designers to implement so they faded out of style.

      • Gerblat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        As far as I know they haven’t been allowed on new cars for a long time, but if you have an older car that has them it’s still legal to drive

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Makes sense, I guess I just hadn’t noticed the change over the years. My son has two cars with pop-up headlights in the yard now, one has a light that keeps going back up and to me it’s hilarious.

  • savvie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    drivers in vehicles with absurdly high hoods have killed hundreds of pedestrians

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The tool does affect the result, though. It’s like stories of mass violence across the world: here in the US, you see a headline like “mass shooting, 10 dead 1 wounded”. In places like China, you see headlines like “mass stabbing, 1 dead 10 wounded”.

      Shitty drivers will always exist, but a shitty driver in a reasonable car is gonna be a lot less effective at manslaughter.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just make it illegal to have unsafe vehicles. Do a buyback for the existing ones.

    Billions for war but anything actually useful is too expensive. This is the bad place.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Despite continued incremental improvements to road infrastructure, pedestrian deaths are spiking, and it’s all because of a narrow new class of vehicles.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’d defer to someone with more expertise, but I’d guess a lot of SUVs and trucks are going to be disqualified.

        While I’m waving this low grade magic wand, maybe require a special license for SUVs or something.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I believe it. But adding that barrier would mean some bad drivers wouldn’t bother, and they’d get a smaller, safer, car instead.

  • Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Vehicles don’t kill people. Guns kill people.

    Oh wait wrong community.

  • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s weird to me that rear view cameras have become so important and mandated (for good reason) while the front end is becoming more and more dangerous - I don’t want to throw technology at every problem but front bumper cams would probably do a lot as well, especially at low speeds, it could activate and take over the instrument panel when it detects anything solid in range. Be better than nothing - they’re not going to ban SUVs in this country anytime soon, I’m afraid.

    • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Squatted trucks are likely a rounding error in the data. Especially when the stock hood height of many modern trucks is so tall.

      I ride past an F250, Cybertruck, or Escalade on my bicycle and my head is just barely over the hood

      I AM 5’11!!!

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    “tall vehicle hoods are at fault” no hon it’s idiots buying and driving large vehicles that’s the problem, they aren’t qualified to drive a go cart let alone something with a “large hood” and i fucking hate that fucking excuse, whoever did that study and published it in a serious tone is an idiot.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Glad you got some feelings out. I’m sure you already know you’re wrong but I’ll bet you purchased a vehicle in the last five years and it’s got a high hood.