• gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    is the joke that he’s overweight? Cause that’s a shite joke if so.

    Do remember there’s the thing of “collateral damage” when you mock a wanker for something that nice friendly people also share as a trait.

  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What do you think is going to get him first: heart disease, type 2 diabetes, or a negligent discharge from waistband carrying a pistol which doesn’t have a manual safety?

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      In this case, the “safety” is the large flap of skin and fat covering the gun, making impossible to draw.

      • RandomStickman@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Glocks having no safety is a misconception. Besides the drop safety and fire pin safety, there is a trigger safety (sometimes jokingly called a dingus) that you have to press before the trigger itself can be pulled. However, the safety is right on the trigger itself, where you can disengage the safety and pull the trigger in one motion. So I guess is where the reputation that Glocks have no safety comes from?

        Having a safety generally speaking isn’t a legal requirement. Many revolvers, for example, doesn’t have a separate switch/button you have to toggle before you pull the trigger. The heavy force required to pull the (double action) trigger fully is deemed safe enough. If that’s safe enough for you or not is a personal judgement for yourself, but this has been the case for about a century. Most modern firearms do have a safety though.

      • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Glocks have some internal safety mechanisms which make them drop-safe, and which makes it basically impossible for them to go off without fully pulling the trigger, but they don’t have a manual safety that you’d flip on and off with your thumb or whatever. The main point of a traditional manual safety is to keep the gun from firing while you’re carrying it, like if you were walking through the woods and a stray branch or something pokes your holster hard enough to move the trigger, for example, the safety would prevent the gun from firing. Or on some pistols (but definitely not all pistols), the manual safety will keep it from firing if you drop it. But with pistols like Glocks which are already drop-safe, modern hard-sided Kydex holsters have made a manual safety kind of redundant because they’re molded to the exact shape of the gun and they completely enclose the trigger guard to keep out anything that might accidentally move the trigger. It’s sort of like having a hard case for your gun right on your hip. So if you’re going to carry a pistol which doesn’t have a manual safety, Kydex holsters are pretty much the only way to go.

        As for manual safeties being required by law, they definitely aren’t where I live. I’ve don’t recall ever seeing a Glock with a safety. But gun laws vary a lot from state to state. If you live somewhere like California it wouldn’t surprise me if a law like that existed there, but I doubt it would most other places.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Nope, slide pressure isn’t much for a 9mm…hell even a 45 you can keep from pushing the slide back.

      And he’s got plenty of weight behind that slide…

      Now an ND might put a nice hole in his leg since he has no holster…

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When you hear someone shot themselves with their gun, just picture this, the person trying to quick draw like some movie cowboy, and the safety not being engaged.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I get so confused trying to understand Americans’ version of “liberal”.

    All I can tell is it’s just a slur both sides use on each other and no one knows what it means or wants to be one, in the land of liberty.

    • scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Liberals = Democrats

      Conservatives = Republicans

      Leftists generally don’t exist here, the only ones on the national stage are Bernie, AOC, and Mamdani, who are generally assumed to just be spicy liberals.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      commie and socialist is used similar. i suspect they haven’t yet opened and read Das Kapital

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Is it in a holster? Normally a holster would clip onto the belt or waistband in some way but I don’t see anything like that. I think this dude just shoved a gun in his pudge holster.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Actual image seems to be from 2019:

    https://www.recordnet.com/story/news/local/communities/oxnard/2019/03/20/five-oxnard-residents-arrested-series-gang-related-shootings/3229570002/

    Three guns were found as authorities in the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office and Oxnard Police Department investigated a series of gang-related shootings. CONTRIBUTED PHOTO/VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

    (Citing original sources is a bit of an obsession for me).