Jyk0L8eLs7jd7es.png

I’m completely speechless. This looks so terrible I thought it was a joke, but apparently Nvidia released these demos to impress people. DLSS 5 runs the entire game through an AI filter, making every character look like it’s running through an ultra realistic beauty filter.

The photo above is used as the promo image for the official blog post by the way. It completely ignores artistic intent and makes Grace’s face look “sexier” because apparently that’s what realism looks like now.

I wouldn’t be so baffled if this was some experimental setting they were testing, but they’re advertising this as the next gen DLSS. As in, this is their image of what the future of gaming should be. A massive F U to every artist in the industry. Well done, Nvidia.

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    425
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Check out this fun little nugget from further down in the article:

    Nvidia actually used two RTX 5090s for its demos: one plays the game, the other exclusively runs the DLSS 5 technology.

    An entire second GPU just to run it.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Makes perfect sense in context.

    Nvidia is no longer a gaming company. They do not care about gamers. They are actively DRIVING AWAY gamers as fast as they can, because AI chips are more lucrative than dirty smelly tiny consumer products.

    This is meant to show off real-time AI generation performance, which is massively marketable to AI companies. Not consumers. Nothing is about consumers.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t believe DF is so positive about this, just looks horrible. I’ve actually been quite positive about technologies like DLSS and FSR but this… no thanks.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Crazy to me to see people just now waking up to just how underinformed Digital Foundry really is to technical details, and how much they sold out.

      • Gathorall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, helps that you don’t need to know how to turn a computer on to see that they’re glazing some complete bullshit, just eyes.

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The amount of glazing they do, holy fuck. They had me too for a minute before I started wondering if this is just an april fools joke

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Eh, DLSS maybe, but they’ve been quite critical of UE5, especially its stutter issues. On the contrary, they’re always happy when something isn’t UE5.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          My issue with UE5 is that it runs like shit, which DF tends to agree with, but it also looks like trash. Temporal effect are all over the place and make the image look like a muddy, ghosting mess. It only ever looks good on static screenshots

  • eli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 months ago

    Idk why, but this reminded me of the South Park episode where everyone is using photoshop to show off their girlfriends.

    Had to make the meme

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    3 months ago

    The demos run on the back of two 5090 GPUs… At what point do we even acknowledge I shouldnt need to be using nearly 2kW of power on a gaming PC on a dedicated circuit in my home? Simply diminishing returns at a certain point and nvidia is bringing us way past that point into very unreasonable territory.

    Is it cool they could do it at all?.. I GUESS?! But they’ve definitely lost the plot here.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just watched the Digital Foundry video on this and the way they fuckin glaze over this tech just disgusted me enough to unsubscribe.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    DLSS 6: You don’t even need to design your game. AI will generate it in real time.🤡

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      You joke, but this is actually something people are trying to do.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      DLSS 7: You don’t even need gamers to play the game. AI will play the game for you.

      (Wasn’t that a Microsoft patent?)

      • sonofearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How does it sit right that a machine is making stuff that is fundamentally supposed to be human creativity and imagination. This is just going make every game look the same with more annoying imperfections that humans won’t make.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Was able to brace myself enough to skim through the video. Anyone that watches those clips and thinks that looks better has no place working on anything related to visual tech. Not only is the interpolation obvious and distracting, every scene, no matter the time of day, location, or anything else, has the exact same shitty lighting that washes out every shadow and color painstakingly added to the scene by actual professionals. Pro-tip: A white-balanced image is the starting point, not the end-goal. Making every game look exactly the same is fucking terrible, you hacks.

    I can only hope this shit only finds its way into the AAAA dross that’s not worth playing already.

    • Golden@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watched it too and noticed that there’s a lot of “added detail” which doesn’t make sense, noise for the sake of noise. Also the main scene they tried to highlight had an umbrella move into the scene, covering the text on the overhang. It was so perfectly timed that I can’t help but think they did it intentionally to hide that this AI also fails with text.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s supposed to look “realistic” to the people who have no sense of realism or taste. i.e. it appeals to the people already consuming slop content

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Good point. I was too distracted by the shadows/reflections on the ground appearing and disappearing for no discernible reason to notice much else in that shot.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hmmm I also just thought of how this is it looking the “best” for the demo and that most of the time it will just be the makeup gun set to “whore”

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I looked at some of the demo images and if it reads old lady, it decides to quintuple the wrinkles and go full witch. But otherwise, yeah, whore gun.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I thought the super glossy look of the unreal 5 demo was off putting and things could not look worse, but here we are. Just hyper stupid everything. Older —> Hag of the ages, Woman ----> Whore makeup, and then what else? Will the men look like the chad meme? will younger characters all be wearing shadow and mascara? Will everything get massive tits? (OK that one might sell).

        Its like everything is now passed through a Instagram filter, but somehow even more vapid.

        Edit:

        Oh dear you where not kidding:

        • DigitalMus@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It is actually even worse, if you look at the lighting direction in the original granny picture, the seemingly only light source is the spark of the magic wand. To me this creates a sense of mystery, caution and tension, and it highlights that magic is the only tool to light the darkness.

          Then in the sloppified version, they just blast the scene in lighting from the right for no reason. Their ai bot even subdues the light of the wand, making it look like a cheap prop. I also get the feeling that they change her gaze from looking at something to looking directly at the camera. So while the 2x5090 GPU slop might technically highlight more details, the entire artistic feeling just ends up with a grandma looking in a makeup mirror.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh yeah, this is going to create some really weird effects if done on everything. These are the “best” examples as well, so lighting no longer being directional is a best case scenario. I just don’t get why though, who wants this?

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The giving every person a light source directly in their faces was a choice. Its like everyone is streaming with a “halo” light.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sure there will be cases it does have that effect, but that isn’t a hag on the right, that’s just an old person with wrinkles. If it was making them up, I’d agree with your hagification claim, but every single wrinkle was present beforehand. It just genuinely looks like a better version, whereas the one on the left looks like a lower res version of the same render.

          It’s probably going to look horrible in gameplay though, the uncanny valley effect of motion is ridiculous.

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think, why people perceive that right image as older is because the wrinkles carve much deeper. Yeah, same number of wrinkles, but it looks like they got chiseled down by 20 additional years…

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              It looks like what wrinkles do if someone is covered in soot and then wipes their face. The definition of the wrinkles is insane.

            • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think the algorithm just realized that it involved someone old because it draws a lot of other characters without this excessive filter. Out of curiosity, I looked the character up, and she’s supposed to be old and even haggish as the professor of defense against the dark arts: https://www.thehergula.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Dinah-Hecat.jpg The wiki even describes her as having been aged excessively by being “injured by time itself”. Honestly, DLSS 5 did an apt rendition at least for this character.

              • Ephera@lemmy.ml
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I mean, yeah, but you’re kind of saying what the others here were saying, too, in that when something fits the anywhere close to the “old hag” category, that the probabilities will shove it entirely towards “old hag”.

                That it’s somewhat fitting for this character, I would expect to be coincidence. Like, maybe they did actually give the image generator somewhat of a system prompt for this demo, that it should make her look extra wrinkly.
                But yeah, shoving all depictions of women either towards young model or old hag is quite emblematic of these image generators, so personally, I don’t think, it was even necessary…