Glaube ich nicht. Ja, die machen was die Fossil-Lobby will, bzw. sind sie sogar selbst, aber die Automobil-Lobby gibt’s auch noch, die darauf keinen Bock hätte.

Can get an RSS feed by appending .rss to the URL:
https://mastodon.social/@flameReactor.rss

Then download that file and grep for:
https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/.*.png

Then download those PNG URLs.

That’s how I assume/hope you implemented that. I guess, you could also download the whole Mastodon page and do the same grep, but yeah, RSS feed is going to be cleaner. 😅

For the record, earthworms do also have mouths, just even tinier ones:

You picked out my one argument where you have a (weak) counterargument and then declare there’s no other arguments. Does not sound like you want to understand…

GDPR says that data should only be kept as long as necessary for the fulfillment of what the user requested or consented to. So, I would say automatic account deletion after inactivity is a good idea for complying with the GDPR.

But you would typically implement that by sending out an e-mail before the deletion, to give the user a chance to keep their data. The GDPR does not block you from implementing that.

Just as an example, neither the C++ documentation nor its sagely bloggers have ever shown why it is a good fit for, say, systems programming. A really neat way of handling bit-level data is actually in Erlang’s bit syntax.

Erlang requires a runtime environment, which disqualifies it for situations where you don’t have a filesystem to load the runtime from, like developing a kernel or for microcontrollers.
Of the popular languages, your choices are virtually just C, C++ and Rust for that.

More towards your general question: Not needing a runtime environment also means you can use C, C++ and Rust for cross-language libraries. For example, SQLite and OpenSSL have just been implemented once in C, and then you simply have a thin wrapper for Java, Python etc…
If you are looking to build a library that can be used by as many devs as possible, that’s a selling point which is hard to ignore.

On Android, Vanilla Music has it. Although the app is unfortunately semi-broken on newer Android versions and not being updated anymore, because Google came up with an even more fucked up API for accessing files in the filesystem.

Deleting songs doesn’t work anymore. Not sure, what else is broken…

https://f-droid.org/packages/ch.blinkenlights.android.vanilla

Bei meiner ersten Fahrstunde bin ich eingestiegen als mein Fahrlehrer einen Anruf bekommt. Er gestikuliert, ich solle losfahren.
Hab’s dann irgendwie geschafft, 7 km weit und 100 km/h schnell zu fahren bevor ich meine erste Praxiserfahrung mit dem Bremspedal gemacht habe. Mit Fahrlehrer immernoch am Telefon…

Sound sample: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_noise

I feel like a big problem is that LLMs only produce previously learned logical patterns, they don’t do logical reasoning of their own. And code review was always bad at catching logic bugs as well.

As a result, even with us diligently doing code reviews at $DAYJOB, we have more logic bugs than I have ever seen in any codebase before.

I’ll spend three weeks discussing an existing feature with other devs and fixing up logic bugs before we realize that the entire feature is conceptually illogical and needs to be removed/replaced.
This has happened twice for me in the past three months, which should tell you a lot about how much time is wasted here.

TL;DR: I feel like we need something different than code review to catch these logic bugs. Maybe more of a presentation of the feature implementation to the other devs, and then a discussion of that.

The street soda gives me !sbubby@lemmy.world vibes. It even looks somewhat like the Subway branding…

Yeah, not only does +x leave read/write permissions untouched, it also only makes it executable for the user, not for everyone and their cat.

Fairerweise bedeutet “Probephase” oftmals einfach nur, dass eine Partei es einführen will, eine andere nicht, oder nicht unbedingt, und dann einigt man sich auf eine Probephase als Kompromiss, so dass nochmal eine zweite politische Abstimmung notwendig wird, bevor es permanent verankert wird.

Well, alright, maybe “squished down” isn’t the right word. I meant that if you buy a map so small that you need countries to be stretched, so that you can read them, then the countries near the equator will be too small to read.

My old lappy had two physical buttons, which were right next to each other. So, if I enabled the option that left-click + right-click = middle-click, then I could just press in the middle where they were divided. I always really liked that, because it didn’t take space away from the other buttons.

Unfortunately, probably depends a lot on the build quality, whether you can actually press the buttons on their edges…

Cool post. 🙂

Yesterday, I made hokkaido pumpkin with chickpeas, rice noodles and a spicy sauce. I forgot again that my new sriracha sauce is like twice as spicy, and I decided while cooking that I had to add some curry paste as well.

So, my mouth was most definitely on fire.

But also, I still have half left for today’s lunch. Can’t wait. 🙃

So, what you’re saying is that you don’t care about the Gambia? 🥲

Part of me wanted to write something like Cambodia and see if you notice.

But more serious answer:
Personally, I fucking hate that I’ve been told incorrect information since young age. I wish every Mercator map had a warning like some countries have in their side mirrors.

I also hate that it reinforces racist biases. But well, evidently you know the truth. And I do get being more interested in the countries in your region. Everyone is.

So, TL;DR: Fair enough. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think, you just have to buy a bigger map for that. With Mercator, it’s Africa’s countries that get squished down.

Well, if you pressurized the hot water, you could presumably carbonate it. But you need to let that pressure out, if you actually want to drink it.

Well, unless you submerge yourself in the hot, pressurized, carbonated water, which I would not recommend actually doing for multiple reasons.