• Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    We can’t even agree on what most of these words mean, much less get the majority of people to care about whether we adhere to them. I know multiple people who think the entirety of science is wrong, and that hispanic people don’t have the human right of safe housing, even when legal citizens.

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the point here is less about actually throwing these terms around and more about the absurdity that it’s basically already like this and folks ain’t being honest about it

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your point is that the terms on the first panel are more clear?

      Well, either way, calling xenophobia as “barbarism” is a nice ironical way for the language to evolve.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        My point is that the time when we might have found the right words to fix things is almost certainly over. It’s now time to start fighting against injustice with real action.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    We cant even agree on what truth vs lies is, or what either of them mean. a lie is okay as long as its convenient ,truth must be hidden if it hurts us

    In a world where truth is now fluid, we need to learn some Russian, just one word, a loanword “Vranyo” Literally it mean lies. but its used in the context “Im lying, you know Im lying, I know that you know Im lying, but you aren’t going to do shit, and I dont care even if you did”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vranyo

    Vranyo has infected western society Its how government operates, its how gangsters operate. convenientley, a lot of the governments and gangsters are now one in the same.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nice link and info, ty

      Edit essentially it’s what the “fell out a window” is. Everyone knows what it actually is

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think you’re right and that is how the word is most often used, but at least merriam-webster gives a broader definition, as the “practices or pretensions of a quack”, which it then says is the same as a charlatan, so I guess it would be acceptable. I’m not a native speaker, however… :)

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Also maybe we should try to stop seeing everything as a binary issue and deciding whether to put a black hat or white hat on everybody. I know oversimplification is a good way to process memes, but it’s really not good enough for dealing with real issues and real people who aren’t cartoons.

  • Cavemanfreak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m quite miffed that the order of the comparisons in the second panel vary…

    1. Bad vs good
    2. Good vs bad
    3. Good vs bad
    4. Good vs bad
    5. Bad vs good
    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think that’s intentional. It’s swapped in the first panel too. It appears more impartial this way.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No it doesn’t

        For anyone sad enough to buy anything these muppets say, Google ‘cognitive priming’

        Edit oh and how they’ve edited their comment to have ridiculous whataboutism in it, such as “hey, replication crisis exists, no theres actually zero science anywhere”.

        edit2 based on the downvotes, Vanja is mad

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                Idk man, I’m just refuting you “nuh-uh, totally opposite” logic.

                “I think it’s intentionally wrong so it appears more impartial”

                It’s sickeningly OBVIOUS that it’s very much partial. It’s putting “authoritarianism” and “corrupt” on the side that it’s established moral things are on

                You guys are dipshits, but it’s no wonder with your education and national infra :D

                • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This is just sad, I can’t even be bothered to be insulted. You’re wrong bro, go figure it out yourself.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Aside from the ridiculousness of reading anything malicious in an unordered comparison list…

          In 2012, a great amount of priming research was thrown into doubt as part of the replication crisis. Many of the landmark studies that found effects of priming were unable to be replicated in new trials using the same mechanisms.[10] The experimenter effect may have allowed the people running the experiments to subtly influence them to reach the desired result, and publication bias tended to mean that shocking and positive results were seen as interesting and more likely to be published than studies that failed to show any effect of priming. The result is that the efficacy of priming may have been greatly overstated in earlier literature, or have been entirely illusory.[11][12]