You deserve to be beaten up.

(Not really, but I think we can all see why that rule exists in some form or other)

Mmm, in that case just sounds like unreliable data.

Darwinism at work again.

Um. You did notice panel 10 - 12, right?

Here’s how I’m reading the questions:

“are you an atheist”. 4%

4% of respondents have a firm belief that gods do not exist. (atheist)

“do you believe in any god” 20%

20% of respondents do not believe in a god, but do not necessarily think they don’t exist either. They don’t have enough knowledge to form a belief, i.e. they don’t know. (agnostic)

Not that I have a particular problem with desire paths, but what’s shown in the comic here is an example of how the design changed to take into account how people are interacting with it, and yet it didn’t work out.

I think it’s a squishbook

Sounds about right, there’s a difference between atheism and agnosticism, which is what the 2nd question is asking.

You not agreeing with the rules of the comm does not automatically translate to the mods power tripping.

Deep plots are nice, unfortunately they keep getting cut every couple seasons, so nobody wants to get invested

Slay*

Wouldn’t the dealers / shops by the most motivated to find the problems, if that’s the case?

Not gonna make much of a difference unless you take your mum with you.

Nah, there’d be nobody around for them to torture anymore, or to appreciate this particular bit of fuckery. The wish as it is is bad enough there’s no need to twist it.

Can’t believe they didn’t call it analmancy

It’s amazing how bad the quality of the writing is, for an article that’s complaining about ChatGPT.

Reminds me of the hats in the Dune miniseries.

It’s not a hot take, it’s fine to dislike popular games for personal reasons. You’re not calling it a horrible game, it just didn’t click for you.

Right, the page was made after the paper. I don’t get your point, though. This is all in response to trump being an idiot? I feel like we agree on that point