Not sure how many people subscribe to anything on Lemmy, but let’s give it a try
I honestly don’t know if Apple users can be saved. They seem to belong to a cult.
Hey! I use a lot of apple stuff and I’m planning to switch to Linux Mint, Ubuntu Touch and Pinetime.
Hmm, maybe I shouldn’t judge so harshly. I’m assuming you didn’t want or didn’t know of Linux when switching to Malus? Malus is just a stepping stone to Linux? What got you into Malus in the first place?
A cult that is surprisingly rabid about text message colors.
I’ve only ever heard that from Americans. I’m surprised it’s not a thing here in the UK seen as we love copying the worst from the yanks, but on this no one cares.
That one is an easy explanation. Many Europeans switched to alternative messaging apps like Whatsapp instead of using SMS text years ago, well before iMessage or RCS came in to make the built in messaging capability better.
Well, Apple itself is not that European…
that’s why you shouldn’t give them the 30%
In general they don’t deserve that much of a cut just for running the store.
They should give us money for forcing “us” (the poor souls being gaslighted into actually using Apple shit) to use the Apple store.
So does Google?
Deny the parasite profit
Honestly, always do this for subscriptions. Go to their website.
The company is losing money if you subscribe via the app. But being on the app store is critical for them.
Should be illegal.
Get a Fairphone. Buy European.
Fairphone 5 on CalyxOS works great.
Fairphone 5 on /e/os checking in. Works great as well
Fairphone 5 on Fairphone OS looking for alternative OSes. Do you guys use NFC payments, and apps with play protect, do they work well?
No, I just can’t do this one, I used to do that but Apple is great at giving my money back, there was a mental health app located in Europe that stole not 200$ but 400$ from me during a period I could not afford it.
They made two mistakes after I had already deleted the app and unsubscribes from the trial.
Apple is great at giving me my money back and I trust them , it takes 15 minutes most of the time.
30%. That’s robbery, it should be illegal.
It pays for the development of system apis, update infrastructure, software deployment infrastructure, software development sdks and toolkits, among a bunch of other very expensive to maintain infrastructure. There’s the argument to be made to force them to allow competition, but I don’t think you can call it robbery from an informed 10000 foot view because everything they provide is extremely expensive and extensively technical to host/construct on your own.
Which doesn’t justify a cut of a 30%. I’m not saying they shouldn’t charge anything, but this is at usurious levels.
I don’t believe you can say that without adequately providing evidence and financial breakdowns. Not saying you’re wrong, but given that developers even in the EU where alternative app markets are allowed still publish to the apple app store, I think that it’s likely more fair than you realize. The cost to do all of what they provide for a $100/yr dev license + 30% pro-bono is immense. Even the least used applications with the smallest budgets receive state of the art infrastructure, toolkits, and security review as well as a bevy of other apple provided resources. It’s the same for other marketplaces as well. Steam for example provides marketing, development guidance, server hosting, and a wide variety of other non-trivial non-free to provide services for their share of the cut.
But 30% is standard.
It has always been highway robbery. Yes, even Steam. Look at how desperate Microsoft was to copy it on their platform that was successful because it’s more open (than Apple).
Wrong, Apple does not provide any additional features besides taking a cut. Sure, maybe they provide the payment process, but that’s it. The moment you subscribe, you might as well forget Apple exists.
Steam, on the other hand, allows: cloud saves, family sharing, media library, big picture, controller support, Linux support, achievements, community, friends, groups, store with tag search, advanced review features, inventory, couch coop over internet, and fuckton of stuff.
I’d say 30% is pretty generous, given Steam’s reach. Also you are not forced to use Steam, you can you GOG, Epic (eww), Ubisoft, EA, Amazon, etc., while with Apple you can’t.
The moment you subscribe, you might as well forget Apple exists.
Slight disagree on this point. Having subscriptions tracked in one place and easily cancelled with a single tap does offer simplicity and some peace of mind. Unfortunately companies sometimes do unexpected things with subscriptions.
For example, say you turn off auto-renew during a promotional period. Often companies will take you through a please-don’t-cancel workflow where you have to find the hidden confirmation button. Worse IMO is when they end the promotional period immediately if you don’t keep auto-renew enabled. Protection from stuff like that must have some value.
Wrong, Apple does not provide any additional features besides taking a cut.
I do think 30% is a lot, but this is absolutely wrong.
Steam, on the other hand, allows: cloud saves, family sharing, media library, big picture, controller support, Linux support, achievements, community, friends, groups, store with tag search, advanced review features, inventory, couch coop over internet, and fuckton of stuff.
Compare this to the APIs and features Apple provides such as iCloud storage, family sharing, media library (both photos/videos and music, separate APIs), AirPlay, controller support, Game Center achievements and leaderboards, integration with iMessage, two whole game engines to build off of, AR API that’s used even by cross platform AR apps like Pokemon Go, a ton of UI/UX tools, and tons of other stuff you need to make an app.
The EU introduce the Digital Markets Act that is supposed to force Malus and Gogle to open up their ecosystem. Gogle is fairly open but for some reason another app store hasn’t made it big. Malus is just locked down as hell but now has AltStore in the EU.
Malus does however not abide completely by the DMA. Someone mentioned “notarisation” to me recently: they still have to approve apps on alternative stores, which the EU isn’t happy about. No one knows how long it’ll take for the EU to force Malus to play by the rules and get rid of notarisation though. Maybe with how the US is acting, it could speed that up, but my bet is on 2026.
Gogle is fairly open but for some reason another app store hasn’t made it big
Samsung has their own app store which I presume does reasonably well in their ecosystem, and Amazon maintains their own app store for Kindle. F-Droid is also reasonably popular with the open source and privacy focused crowd.
Malus?
Why though?
It’s like saying Crapple or Micro$oft, but pretentious, I guess.
Think a little. I know you can get it.
Ok loser.
Latin word for apple tree, also means bad or evil. I think it should be malum (apple) instead, which also means bad or evil.
It would be fine IF iOS allowed other app stores to compete with their own. This is why it’s fine when steam does it, because the game developers can always go to GOG or Epic or itch if they want
Steam has the biggest reach and has a Most Favored Nation policy. If you offer your product cheaper anywhere else, you’ll be exiled from Steam.
It’s required. And they’ll charge whatever the fuck they want and you’ll pay it. Otherwise, you’re never selling your game outside of your family.
IANAL but I’m pretty sure Steam’s seller terms, like other MFN clauses infringe the Article 101(1) of the the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The problem is that the European Commission still didn’t get that videogames are not “just games” but a huge industry that needs to be properly regulated.
Geoblocking keys within the EU market was deemed illegal, the key reselling policy wasn’t. It doesn’t seem unfair either as Steam allows developers to create keys for free. If they were to allow cheaper sales elsewhere, how would they keep the lights on?
The issue is that MFN means publishers can’t sell cheaper in GOG than in Steam, which means GOG has trouble competing, even though GOG sales cost Valve nothing. IMO it would be fine if Steam said steam keys need to be sold at the same price as the game on Steam, but that’s not what’s happening ehre.
IMO it would be fine if Steam said steam keys need to be sold at the same price as the game on Steam, but that’s not what’s happening here.
That is exactly what is happening though?
“It is important that you don’t give Steam customers a worse deal than Steam Key purchasers.” https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/features/keys#%3A~%3Atext=It+is+important+that+you+don’t+give+Steam+customers+a+worse+deal+than+Steam+Key+purchasers.
Valve policy states you cannot undercut the base price on another site, sales happen all the time on GOG and Epic that do not happen on Valve. The steam keys mean the developer cannot resell the keys at a lower cost since it provides access to Steam features such as the workshop and cloud storage.
Which means they are using their dominant position to distort the market and protect their 30% cut. Which means they should be fined.
This is completely incorrect.
The rule is that
You cannot generate Steam codes and sell them on alternative storefronts for less than you would sell them for on Steam for a similar length of time.
There is absolutely no rule saying that you cannot sell your game on alternative store fronts for less. There isn’t even a rule saying that you can’t sell Steam keys on alternative store fronts for less than you are currently selling them of Steam. Just not always selling Steam keys on alternative store fronts without at least sometimes selling them for that price on Steam.
There’s a effective rule. It’s not written, because it could lead to legal trouble, but they’ll enforce it anyway.
https://www.lawinc.com/valve-steam-antitrust-lawsuit-pc-gaming
That PR site is NOT what is actually being sued.
The actual suit complains that you can’t resell keys for less.
As part of a larger suit.
I don’t think that’s a fair categorisations. I believe that is only for selling steam keys elsewhere.
Steam allows publishers to generate steam keys for their games at no cost. The publisher can then sell those keys elsewhere. The only requirement is the keys not be sold for less than the price charged on steam. ie if the publisher can sell the key on any other platform and valve gets $0.
Expecting valve to distribute your game and provide access to their steam works features for free while allowing a publisher to undercut them would be insanity.
https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/features/keys
Steam Keys are single-use, unique, alphanumeric codes that customers can activate on Steam to add a product license to their account. Steam Keys are a free service we provide to developers as a convenient tool to help you sell your game on other stores and at retail, or provide for free for beta testers or press/influencers. Steam keys are a free service, so we ask you to use good judgment and follow basic guidelines and rules around requesting and selling them.
I was speaking of selling. Nothing to do with steam keys.
Yes, we know.
And you are wrong.
It also is usually cheaper to do it that way. I’ve noticed quite a while ago the difference in subscription prices on website vs Apple Pay.
Apple Pay is something else. It is basically just your credit card.
More or less it’s the same for Android. Always subscribe using the browser
Browser subscription gang
