• stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m O- so I give two units of red cells and get saline and the plasma/antibodies back. The guy at the donation site says “make sure you don’t drink any alcoholic beverages for 24 hours…but you can have one if you want.” He looks back to see if his manager is around and then whispers “you can have two but don’t leave the house.”

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      At least last time I donated blood in my country (Canada), you could discretely indicate “do not use” by applying a different sticker to the bag. This was done in case someone got peer pressured into donating but didn’t want to reveal something private that would have disqualified them otherwise.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We (India) don’t have that, mainly because blood bags don’t grow on trees, but there’s a question about sleeping eight hours the previous night that always seemed irrelevant. Now that I think about it, it might have been added for this purpose.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Me suspecting my date is actually an Aedes spp. mosquito:

    “heeeey so how about after this drink we hit the blood bank? You know, just the two of us and a lot, and I do mean a lot, of blood bags? How about that huh?”

      • Khrux@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Some of my fondest memories and best bonding experiences are from getting horrendously drunk with somebody. I’m not sure if it’s safe for dating because you need to trust the other person to be a decent human being while drunk, but most people are.

        If it’s just the two of you, or you and strangers you’ll never meet again, you’ll end up with a better bond from this shared experience, because neither person comes off worse than the other if you’re both black out.

        Also of course it’s not a cute idea? The post is clearly humourous.

  • the_weez@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I actually did this in my early 20s. Girlfriend at the time got super drunk super fast so I had to stay sober to drive us home.

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Saving lives is pretty hot, but its a shame they don’t let you do this if you’re gay or use cannabis.

    Edit: this is getting out of hand, I do not live in the US. Happy for y’all that do! Although, overall I’m pretty glad not to be living there.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you’re talking about the American Red Cross, they have removed most of the explicitly queerphobic rules. They still ask about high risk activities, but in a non gendered way.

      It was kind of insane, though, that 20 years ago I was banned for life for having sucked cock. Turns out I was just boymoding, and as soon as I transitioned cocksucking became just fine for blood donation.

      • raptorattacks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just discovered these rule changes based on your comment. Unfortunately my partner and I still can’t donate blood (they’re on PREP, and I was in a vaccine trial that disqualifies me), but it’s cool that they’ve finally eliminated the worst of the queerphobia in the US.

        I experienced the reverse of you - as soon as I transitioned I was disqualified as a trans man who has sex with men, even if the sex was identical pre- and post-transition. These were the previous “updated” rules that were supposed to be less queerphobic, but obviously weren’t hitting the mark.

          • raptorattacks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Quoting from the red cross FAQ:

            The waiting period is required due to these drugs interfering with viral replication and thus possibly altering the detectability of diagnostic and screening tests for HIV, including extending the window period prior to detectable infection or a delay in producing antibodies.

            The Red Cross and the FDA support individuals making responsible choices for their health and the broader health of our communities. The Red Cross and FDA are involved in ongoing research, data collection and assessment related to transfusion safety, including the use of HIV preventative medications, and will continue to seek opportunities that could potentially help lead to additional changes. The Red Cross does not encourage individuals to stop taking these medications in order to donate blood.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yeah but that would enable the prolonging of people’s lives. Given how shit life and the world are, I can’t engage or support that; it’d unethical for me force people to stay alive. Y’all do what you think is right, but I see it as needless cruelty.