That's the problem with a C- in economics. If you sit behind that person and decide you're going to just try to write the opposite of what they do you're going to get an F
It makes me wonder, Jepstein set a lot of gears to turn independently, but without the spider at the center of the right-wing web I wonder how completely the propaganda will deteriorate as there's now one less cohesive force at the center pushing it forward.
Yes. You should have to censor yourself for neighbors and peers to have a functioning society. You should not have to do it for corporations. The line is pretty cut and dry and we should fight to keep it.
Real question: what on earth does "on the street" mean in the tech startup world? Because I have a strong suspicion that "on the street" means just going to work a normal job like 300 million other people even despite personal anecdotes of one or two people who literally became homeless.
Having watched TNG without being influenced by the community. I agree that his character starts pretty obnoxious, but I always got the sense that the point of his character was that his inclusion on the ship as a kid raised by this future world was just as "alien" as Data or Worf. Then again, it was also obvious that he occasionally got completely brain bonked for some episodes in order to make him the naive child of the group.
It's like a kit car. It comes with the chassis and engine all intact, technically street-legal. You just get to decide whether you want windshields and doors, which some people consider pretty obvious and too much of a hassle to pretend they're "optional"
Yes, you certainly can say this about any religion, something to think on. Right now it's Christianity's time to shine though since it is at the center of American fascism and is manufacturing complicity for one of the most serious child trafficking rings in American history.
Yes, but unlike on Instagram or Facebook, engagement doesn't translate into a boosted account and cannot translate into money. So comments about the engagement bait aren't playing into their hand since there's nothing for the poster to benefit from.
Lots of answers but I think the explicit joke here is that grapefruit doesn't work with certain types of antidepressant medications, which redbull's clients are presumably on.
Damn, you're right. It's like how I'm not worried about wealth inequality because I lucked out and have a steady 60k a year job with a nice employer. Not all employers are bad.
Or how I don't give a shit about abortion because I made the stone-cold choice to not be a woman.
When things aren't affecting me they don't matter so why are people making a big deal about it?
It was a powerful lie to convince most gun owners that a "right to a well-regulated militia" meant being able to individually own a gun and never be trained to use it or organize.
I think it's best not to mind people who try any level of veganism. Even if they are lying to themselves and others etc. if someone makes even the slightest effort that advances the vegan movement it works in our favor. You can see it happen in real time.
There are more vegan products on the market today that are widely used by people who don't even want to be vegan. Plenty of people just prefer oat milk or almond milk or do it exclusively for health reasons. The vegan movement is a rare fringe movement that's actually broken through. The more people choose to just do "everything vegan but bacon/cheese" the more the demand for vegan products grows and the more people are incentivized to stock their shelves with vegan food over expensive and expiration prone meat products. It's a movement that's happening because the trajectory is passively positive with no real social pushback. Maybe in another couple years we can even start to cut government subsidies to meat products in favor of vegan products.
That's the problem with a C- in economics. If you sit behind that person and decide you're going to just try to write the opposite of what they do you're going to get an F